Twitter is pointing out a 'micro' issue with PTV's new logo

Twitter users seem disappointed with the state-run broadcaster’s new logos for its eight different channels


News Desk September 06, 2016

Fierce competition has given rise to improvements in the electronic media industry at large. But all of that seems to be of little importance to state-run PTV.

It was recently surfaced that the state-run television corporation has suffered Rs1.12 billion losses within two years with nearly 70 per cent of its expenditure reportedly on human resources. In a recent Senate standing committee meeting, Information and Broadcasting Division Secretary Imran Gardezi lamented about the poor state of affairs at the state-run channel.

PTV running at a loss in PML-N tenure

So when the national broadcaster recently introduced new logos for its eight channels, people on social media immediately began questioning what they were thinking.

Not only was the redesign deemed 'lazy', some also pointed out how it resembled Microsoft Internet Explorer's iconic logo.

Here's how it went down on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/anthonypermal/status/773060197203992576







https://twitter.com/Rizwvan/status/770622465445953536



https://twitter.com/ma_arain/status/770319270379130881



Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.

COMMENTS (11)

ARIF RAHMAN CHUGHTAI | 6 months ago | Reply Twitter needs education in our aesthetics.
ARIF RAHMAN CHUGHTAI | 6 months ago | Reply The silliest statement in the universe. Our National Icon of PTV does not suit these third rate designers. It is a design by the National Artist of Pakistan. And if you do not know he is the internationally renowned Abdur Rahman Chughtai honoured in his life time and honoured to this day. With zero aesthetics judgement anyone saying contrary to our Ideology is merely bull in all ways. Do not mess with our aesthetics. The Peacock of PTV is above reproach.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ