Pakistan should not internationalise Kashmir issue: Indian minister

PM Nawaz nominated 22 parliamentarians as special envoys to be dispatched to world capitals to highlight the problem


News Desk August 28, 2016
PHOTO: FILE

India's Minister of State for External Afairs MJ Akbar on Saturday said Pakistan should not internationalise the Kashmir issue.

In a comment to ANI, Akbar said, “As far as the Kashmir issue is concerned, Pakistan must not internationalise it; it is a bilateral issue.”

Indian atrocities in Kashmir: 22 MPs tasked to ‘shake world’s conscience’

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s decision to appoint 22 special envoys to highlight Kashmir issue at various world capitals was slammed by the Indian government on Saturday. “We will remind the United Nations its long-held promise of self-determination to the Kashmiri people,” Nawaz said.

According to Radio Pakistan, “The Prime Minister urged the special envoys to ensure their efforts for highlighting the Kashmir cause across the world so that it can shake the collective conscience of the international community during his address at the UN General Assembly this September.”

PM Nawaz said the Kashmir problem is the most persistent failure of the UN and that the world body must establish its relevance. “We will also make it clear to India that it was India that approached the UN several decades back on Kashmir dispute but now it is not fulfilling its promise,” he added.

India to use chilli-based weapon in restive Kashmir

Pakistan’s move comes against the backdrop of escalating tensions and war of words between the nuclear-armed neighbours in the aftermath of the unrest in the Kashmir Valley after Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani was killed in an encounter with security forces in July.

This article originally appeared on The Indian Express.

COMMENTS (26)

Shuaib | 7 years ago | Reply @PrakashG: Ofcourse! Before 26/11, no such incidents took place why wasn't the issue resolved then? When Vajpayee came to power, Pakistan & India had very good discussions are 50 or so years, but it's has and always will be Indian unwillingness, since it's the more economically and militarily stronger of the two parties.
G. Din | 7 years ago | Reply It is a friedly piece of advice so Pakistan can avoid later embarrassment. India is not scared. It should be handled bilaterally. India's interest/preference for bilateral engagement is only in respect of return of Pakistan-occupied territories and cessation of terror without open hostilities. Shimla Agreement says so. UN Secretary General says he will not get involved unless BOTH parties request it. US says exactly the same except it does not even want to get into the mess. Trust me there is no power on earth which can get involved if it doesn't want embarrassment. Entities like OIC or Turkey do not count. Theirs can be only empty rhetoric.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ