US Olympic swimmers banned from leaving Brazil

Lochte, one of swimming's most decorated Olympians, had already returned to the US ahead of the court ruling


Reuters August 17, 2016
Swimmer Ryan Lochte. PHOTO: AFP

RIO DE JANEIRO: A judge in Brazil has issued an order to prevent US swimmers Ryan Lochte and James Feigen from leaving the country on the grounds they gave conflicting accounts of their robbery outside the Rio Games on Sunday, a Brazilian daily said on Wednesday.

Lochte, one of swimming's most decorated Olympians, had already returned to the United States ahead of the court ruling, the newspaper quoted Brazilian police as saying.

It was unclear if Feigen had also left the country. The Games swimming competition ended on Saturday. Lochte said he, Feigen and two other team mates were travelling to the Athletes' Village in a taxi in the early hours of the morning, after a party, when armed men carrying police badges pulled them over.

Gold-winning swimmer Ryan Lochte held up at gunpoint in Rio

The gunmen ordered them to drop to the ground and demanded their wallets and belongings, Lochte said. Officials from the US Olympic Committee and a lawyer for Lochte could not be immediately reached for comment.

After the decision by Judge Keyla Blanc, of the Special Tribunal for Fans and Major Events, authorities requested a search and arrest warrant for the swimmers with the aim of finding Feigen's cellphone in order to identify exactly where the swimmers were on Sunday night, O Globo reported.

Civil police agents visited the US delegation building on Wednesday and spoke to the head of security there, but neither of the swimmers was present, the paper said.

Meet the Olympic swimmer who flips off his dad before every race

Police sources have told Reuters in recent days they have been unable to find the taxi driver allegedly involved in the incident or to corroborate any details provided by the swimmers.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ