A smaller, better cabinet

The size of the current cabinet was a heavy burden on the taxpayer and the focus of much public resentment and anger.


Editorial February 04, 2011

The decision by the PPP’s Central Executive Committee to authorise the prime minister to dissolve the cabinet, in effect paving the way towards a leaner and smaller cabinet, is a good one and should be welcomed in that it seeks to implement the Eighteenth Amendment in letter and spirit. Even after the withdrawals of the MQM and the JUI-F, the size of the current cabinet – over 50 members – was a heavy burden on the taxpayer and the focus of much public resentment and anger. One of the main reasons, the people have been told, for the dissolution was that several ministries had been devolved fully to the provinces and hence these divisions needed to be closed down since they did not need to exist at the federal level. A similar kind of exercise happened at the Sindh government level earlier this past week with 12 advisers to the chief minister being let off, and here too the Eighteenth Amendment was cited as the reason.

While it is too early to know what the size of the new cabinet will be, one hopes that it will be not more than half of the outgoing one. Also, the prime minister, one sincerely hopes, will consult with his coalition partners to choose individuals who can do justice to the portfolios that are assigned to them. In fact, that should be the primary purpose behind this “right-sizing”, as the government is calling it. The idea should also be to find new, preferably younger, faces and especially those individuals who have a moderate worldview and are forward-thinking. It would be a waste of time, frankly speaking, if the same old faces are instead picked up because as far as performance goes, apart from a few ministers – and this number can be counted on the fingers of one hand – the rest have performed miserably. That is where democracy’s missing link is found in this country – in that those who are elected by the people to parliament do practically nothing for the electorate and the result is all before us: massive levels of misgovernance and an abject failure by the government to deliver even the most basic of amenities and services to ordinary Pakistanis.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 5th, 2011.

COMMENTS (3)

Imtiaz Ali | 13 years ago | Reply I think this is large cabinet of Pakistan but it is better then last on the behalf of citizen of Pakistan new should have small because my country can not bear lot of expenditure like previous cabinet our country is also besiege foreign loan.
Abdul Mannan Lodhi | 13 years ago | Reply A smaller and a better cabinet.Alas our leaders had realised it earlier.Specially when they were passing the eighteenth amendment.When they came to limiting the cabinet they agreed but were quick to see that the proposed amendment does not apply to them and is effective only after the next election.This shows how much our democratic leaders have regard for the sufferings of the people.No wonder Pkistan's foreign and domestict debts in the last three years increased almost as much as the preceding sixty years.Now it appears under pressure they are said to be limiting the cabinet size but it is yet to be seen how effective is this change going to be.And what about the losses Pakistani nation had to suffer because of the present large cabinet and the corruption and bad governance of our leaders.Politicians say that the worst democracy is better than the best dictateship.People of Pakistan will say that the government which solves the peoples'problems and earns for the country respects and admiration abroad and not humiliation and disrespects is better.For God's sake dont say that you want to protect the system.What system.A system of corruption and bad governance and total disregard of the interests of the country.We wish all respects and admiration for our leaders in the country and abroad but it has to be earned.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ