The steady expansion of intolerance

Published: February 4, 2011

[email protected]

In recent days, The New York Times, as well as this newspaper, expressed concern about the steady expansion of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. Of much more concern at this point in time, however, is the steady and frighteningly swift expansion of intolerance, bigotry and mindlessness, all of which are common to both parliament and the streets.

The expansion of the nuclear arsenal is, of course, in itself mindless, if not downright wicked, as the nation sinks under massive debt, criminal governmental expenditure, an economic meltdown due to a state of non-governance and the selfishness of the mighty army, forever thirsting for more toys for the boys.

We have known, for long, of the fecklessness, the corruption and the damage that can be done by various leaderships, mostly because of their cowardice in the face of religious extremism or, in the case of Ziaul Haq, of his religiosity. Since Pakistan was broken in 1971, we have had Zulfikar Ali Bhutto surrender to the religious right and successive so-called democratic governments uphold laws and practices that have brought upon Pakistan international opprobrium.

What is happening now is probably a logical progression, but it is horrid and it is highly worrisome to a few pessimists who fail to spot any optimism — even in the blossoming fashion show industry. Following the governmental unzipping line, the honourable Senate exhibited the true calibre of its members when, under the craven leadership of its chairman, it was prevented from acknowledging the murder of the governor of the largest and most powerful province. What a bunch of lily-livered funks, all of them, other than the gutsy Nilofar Bakhtiar who, some time ago, showed that she has spunk. And the same description applies to the rest of what passes for parliament and government.

Ably supported by politicians of all hues, the religious right has now claimed the streets as their own. United, the religious parties, banned and un-banned, marched and screamed, presumably with governmental blessings, first in Karachi and then in Lahore, where they were joined by several of our mainstream ‘democratic’ political parties who cheered them on. The ‘demand’ involved the blasphemy laws over which the government has bent backwards to assure everyone that they will not be touched, despite their propensity to support murder, terrorism, unlawfulness and downright bigotry. That this country has spawned such laws is a disgrace and that they are supported by various leaderships is a quadruple-disgrace.

These people, who claim to be men of the book, are unable to substantiate the punitive aspects of the blasphemy laws with citations from the Holy Quran. They march mindlessly, grasping at all and any straws, and in Lahore there were even anti-Shia chants, despite the fact that a Shia organisation marched with them. Brought in as an extra during the Lahore demo of January 30 was the issue of the American cowboy responsible for a shooting incident a few days previously, and, of all people, it was a representative of the party of Imran Khan who ‘demanded’ that he be hanged publicly. Just where is this nation going? And how has it come to pass that it finds itself in a situation where many normal educated citizens are in such a state of fright that they are unable to even dispassionately discuss any matter pertaining to religion as it is practiced and preached in the Islamic Republic?

And why are the street warriors silent on the regular bombing, murder and maiming of the citizens of Pakistan?

The US and the world have good reason to be worried about the expanding nuclear arsenal — if it ever falls into the hands of our government’s favoured allies, heaven help us all.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 5th,  2011.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (10)

  • Sara
    Feb 4, 2011 - 11:17PM

    I was not expecting such article from u.
    Imran khan’s demand is correct.Recommend

  • Freeha Shaukat
    Feb 5, 2011 - 12:22AM

    I would respectfully like to point out a serious point of confusion, (as an official member of Imran Khan’s party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, PTI); PTI is certainly not demanding “public hanging” of Raymond Davis, simply due process of law. The article says that this person was a “representative” of PTI, the public hanging demand may be his own personal view but this is not the official PTI position on this matter, and I would like to clarify this.Recommend

  • parvez
    Feb 5, 2011 - 1:04AM

    Your article is harsh but on second thought the truth is usually hard to digest. I agree with your views.Recommend

  • pj
    Feb 5, 2011 - 1:09AM

    Imran Khan’s demand is far from correct. His view on the US is as one dimensional and intolerant as that of most of the religious right.
    How can you ‘demand’ for someone to be publicly hanged before any investigation has been completed? Imran Khan is just feeding the anti-US mania in Pakistan to dangerous levels, along with the religious right-but then you’d expect it from them. I expect better from Imran Khan.Recommend

  • Sharma
    Feb 5, 2011 - 1:22AM


    People are only hanged in autocratic society.
    Let the judiciary decide .Recommend

  • faraz
    Feb 5, 2011 - 1:22AM

    I am seriously disappointed at Imran’s stance on Raymond case. PTI is turning into a modern Jamaat Islami.Recommend

  • vasan
    Feb 5, 2011 - 6:20AM

    This article is an answer to all the India bashers and closet talibans of Pakistan in this paper’s blog and shows the true picture of Pakistan’s descend into anarchy and religious fanaticism. Poor or rich, educated or uneducated, cultured or not, talibanism has spread far and wide into the population. India needs to protect itself and finish off the terrorist attitude within India (like Col purohit). Otherwise the disease will spread east as well as a reactionary trend and will cause communal anarchy..Recommend

  • Anis Qureshi
    Feb 5, 2011 - 10:22AM

    Shias should dissociate themselves from these extremist religious parties. They should standup for tolerance in society. Fatwas of these mullahs means nothing in the eyes of ALLAH. But shias should be responsible for not standing up for the rights of their pakistani fellows beings especially minorities. They should work with only real secular parties.Recommend

  • M M Malik
    Feb 5, 2011 - 11:35AM

    The root cause of the spread of intolerance is the ignorant and arrogant ‘maulana’ brigade. Recommend

  • Ali Haider
    Feb 5, 2011 - 12:30PM

    Davis case can be divided in fact and fiction, as The Friday Times editorial says. Giving stupid statements shows Pakistan has stooped so low. Let the court decide. It appears Davis was defending himself from these two people and when killing is a daily occurance, who should blame the guy?Recommend

More in Opinion