Bill empowering banks to sell mortgaged property blocked

Senate panel objects to courts being disallowed to intervene


Shahbaz Rana June 08, 2016
Senate panel objects to courts being disallowed to intervene. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: A senate panel has blocked approval of a bill that would have given sweeping powers to banks to sell mortgaged properties.

The Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances Amendment) Bill 2016 was blocked after it was found to be in violation of a Supreme Court (SC) order and could also infringe a constitutional right of borrowers.

Think tank calculates GDP growth at 3.1%

Despite desperate efforts by State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Governor Ashraf Mahmood Wathra and Secretary Finance Dr Waqar Masood to get it passed, the bill could not sail through the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue. The SBP governor repeatedly expressed his no confidence in the country’s judiciary and said the banks did not get justice from courts.

The committee, however, approved another bill - Financial Institutions (Secured Transactions) Bill 2016, which would facilitate small borrowers to get loans from banks by pledging their movable assets including ‘ideas’, copyrights, patents and goodwill.

The push to pass this law to facilitate small and medium-sized borrowers came from the Netherland’s Queen Maxima, who visited Pakistan in February this year to promote greater financial inclusion.

The components of the bill

The ‘Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Bill’ gives sweeping powers to commercial banks in handling mortgaged properties.

The government has proposed that the banks can sell the mortgaged property without involving courts. The banks will have all rights on rent and profit from the mortgaged property after serving default notice to the borrower. The banks have also been given a right to purchase the mortgaged property by paying 10% higher than the highest bid price.

Govt may double tax on transfer of properties

The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance already passed the bill in April this year. The Senate panel would take a final decision on it by June 21.

The committee on Wednesday decided to further review a SC’s judgment, in which it struck down a law that had given sweeping powers to the banks.

The government has proposed “where a mortgager fails to pay the amount as demanded within the period, the financial institution may, without the intervention of any court, sell the mortgaged property by public auction”.

PML-N Senator Kamil Ali Agha, however, said the proposed amendment infringes the constitutional right to go to court and seek justice.

However, the SBP governor had a different point of view.

“In this country, there is no check on loan defaulters who freely roam around and the banks do not get justice from courts,” said Wathra.

The standing committee made a counter proposal, suggesting that the banks may auction the property “subject to the court’s approval”. The SBP did not agree.

“In its December 2013 judgment in which it declared clause 15 of Finance Institution Recovery Ordinance ultra-vires, the SC did not accept the concept of non-judicial intervention,” said Mohsin Kamal, the legal consultant to the standing committee.

'Parliament can't impose tax on provincial property'

“The apex court ruled that there was no mechanism under which borrowers could be involved in the foreclosure process,” he said, adding that the apex court also raised objections over parallel court proceedings and the lack of reserve price mechanism.

“The 2013 judgement led to a drastic reduction in house financing, which is not more than half percentage points of total banking sector lending,” responded Wathra. “The proposed law would facilitate the housing sector lending.”

Secured Transactions Bill

The standing committee approved the secured transaction bill, which will help small and medium-sized borrowers get loans from banks by pledging movable assets.

During her visit to Pakistan, Queen Maxima said that Pakistan could increase its lending to SME sector from 7% to 15% by using movable assets as collaterals in credit and for that to happen, there was a need to have registry and legislation to facilitate this in parliament.

The government has defined movable assets that include receivables, rights under letter of credits, rights under trust receipts, securities, right to funds credited in a deposit account, title documents and negotiable instruments.

Among other movable assets are intellectual property including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade-names, goodwill, royalties, stock in trade, inventory, interest in partnership and other form of entity, ornaments, jewellery, stones, goods in transit, agriculture produce, leaves, grass (including growing grass), petroleum and minerals, motor vehicles and property attached to immovable property.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 9th, 2016.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (7)

Ch. Allah Daad | 8 years ago | Reply The mentality of Senate, SC and general public is the reason our economy will never be on upward swing. Banks don't sell someone else's property. They would sell or take custody of their own property because they have ( in most of the cases) more than 75% share of property in default. Our elected bodies and SC is ignoring the fact that construction of buildings, houses and other projects are most important indicator of economy. Thousands of other jobs are created when a construction project is underway. To move economy upward banks must provide loans to lower and middles classes but the real questions is on whose terms. On politicians terms, SC terms or on their depositors terms whose money banks would be lending. Ours is a strange nation, we deposit our money to banks which they loan but when we should stand with the custodian of our money, we stand with those who steal our money. Every defaulted amount hit hard our economy, our purchasing value and devalue our own deposited money. Banks stop giving loans to lower and middle classes, resulting in downward economic trend. The whole country suffers for those who hide behind human rights, lazy and corrupt judicial system.
Fahim | 8 years ago | Reply Consumer rights protected. Good work
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ