Khurram Zaki was well known for his outspoken criticism of the Taliban and their fellow travellers, and the reasons for his murder are clear enough — firstly he was killed for his own sectarian adherence, secondly his criticism of extremist groups and thirdly a rising public profile that centred on street activism and a busy presence on the internet with websites that promoted pluralism and were “critical, progressive and inclusive”.
The police have lodged an FIR against unnamed persons and say that Mr Zaki was receiving death threats as were his friends; he will have known he was a marked man. A faction of the banned Taliban has claimed responsibility for the attack. Despite bans on such organisations, they operate openly and freely, unconstrained by the orders that ban them and with widespread tacit and overt support both in and outside of official circles. In a society such as ours, by far the easiest way of dealing with dissenters is to kill them one by one until the dissenting civil society is reduced to a muttering shadow. We expect no early change.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 10th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ