Foreign firms’ profit outflow higher than incoming FDI

Amounts to $817.1m; $170m more than inflow of FDI received over the same period


Our Correspondent March 12, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

KARACHI:


Repatriation of profits on foreign direct investment (FDI) outpaced the net inflow of FDI in the first seven months of 2015-16, according to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).


The repatriation of profits by companies operating in Pakistan to their stakeholders based in foreign countries amounted to $817.1 million in Jul-Jan, which is almost $170 million more than the inflow of FDI ($647.9 million) the country received over the same period.

Engro Foods’ 2015 profit up 256%

Pakistan allows 100% foreign ownership of businesses and unrestricted repatriation of profits to encourage investment in the country. The repatriation of profits can be in the form of either dividends or liquidation of foreign holding.

Profit repatriation on FDI increased 16.2% year-on-year in Jul-Jan, SBP data shows. In contrast, FDI registered growth of 4.5% over the same period.

In January alone, repatriations on FDI amounted to $76.7 million as opposed to FDI inflows of $23.9 million.



In 2014-15, profit repatriations on FDI amounted to $1.3 billion, up 30.6% from the repatriation of a little over $1 billion recorded in 2013-14. Pakistan received FDI of $709.3 million in 2014-15, which was 58.2% less than the FDI received in the preceding fiscal year.

Among major sectors of the economy, financial businesses repatriated the largest amount to their stakeholders in foreign countries in July-Jan. With the payment of $169.6 million profits in July-Jan, the year-on-year increase in the repatriated amount for financial businesses was 32%.

The thermal sector’s share in the repatriated profits on FDI during the first seven months of 2015-16 was $123.9 million, which was almost double (up 96%) from the corresponding figure recorded at the end of the comparable period of 2014-15.

The repatriated profits on FDI in the telecommunication sector remained $93.6 million, down 40% from the profit repatriation during the same period in the preceding fiscal year.

Market watch: Sparked with interest, index soars past 32,000

Repatriations from the oil and gas exploration sector in July-Jan were $63.2 million, up 62.5% from the comparable period of 2014-15 when they totalled $38.9 million.

Other sectors that recorded relatively substantial repatriations in July-Jan were food ($75.6 million), petroleum refining ($45.8 million), beverages ($45.2 million) and transport equipment ($42.4 million).

As for repatriation of profits on foreign portfolio investment (FPI), as much as $241.1 million left Pakistan during the first seven months of 2015-16, up 57.9% from the repatriations on FPI ($152.7 million) in the same period of the preceding fiscal year.

The notable increase in the repatriations on FPI is reflective of a global trend. International investors have been pulling their money out of emerging and frontier markets, which results in increased repatriations of profits. While sovereign funds belonging to Gulf nations pulled out money to bridge their deficits in the wake of declining oil prices, independent funds shifted their focus away to the United States where rising interest rates promised higher returns.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 13th, 2016.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (2)

Gp65 | 8 years ago | Reply So what happened to CPEC? Wasn't it supposed to bring &3 billion of FDI every year for the next 15 years?
Woz ahmed | 8 years ago | Reply Is not the whole point of FDI to invest X amount and to eventually withdraw X + y amount ? Pakistan is considered a high risk economy, so investors expect a higher return on any investment. Are we really high risk ? Not for me to say, but if you look at the interest rate our government pays on Eurobonds , 8.5%, then the markets say yes.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ