A Trump presidency doesn't worry Pakistan: Sartaj Aziz

Responding to Trump’s remarks, Aziz says US should stay in Afghanistan but not because of Pakistan's nuclear weapons


News Desk March 09, 2016
PHOTO: REUTERS

Pakistan is not overly concerned about the possibility of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump occupying the White House or his proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz said on Tuesday.

"What you do in the campaign doesn't mean that it becomes policy," Aziz told CNN, while in Washington to meet US officials.

US should remain in Afghanistan to protect Pakistan's nuclear arms, says Trump

Responding to Trump’s remarks about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal in the Fox News debate on Thursday, Aziz said, “The United States should stay in Afghanistan but not because of his country's nuclear weapons. In our view, a sudden withdrawal would not be advisable”.

Trump had cited Pakistan’s nuclear weapons as the reason for the United States to stay in Afghanistan.

Although some 195,000 Afghan troops have been trained by the US military, Aziz cited the country's lack of an air force to support ground forces in operations against the Taliban as a leading reason for US forces to stay in the country.

Speaking about Trump’s call to ban Muslims from entering the US, Aziz said that Pakistan viewed America as a multicultural society that is too rooted in the ideals of tolerance for such a ban to ever be enacted.

Sartaj rules out sharing of nuclear technology

"The strength of these values in America is very strong. Even if, you know, for political reasons or short-term popularity somebody espouses these ideas to appeal to one segment of the population, the broad spectrum of America ... will not buy this," PM’s adviser said.

Aziz also gave a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), saying that peace negotiations between the Afghan government and Taliban could begin in the coming week or two. Further, he acknowledged that the Taliban leadership was inside Pakistan, giving leverage to his government to pressure them to come to the table.

"We have some influence in them because their leadership is in Pakistan," he said. “They get some medical facilities. Their families are here."

He added that Pakistan did not see the Taliban as able to achieve victory on the battlefield on the ground but said the group was capable of continuing their insurgency for an "indefinite period."

Pakistan hints at progress on Taliban talks within days

"That's why peace in Afghanistan can come only through a reconciliation process," Aziz urged.

The PM’s adviser further said that he did not consider Islamic State (IS) to be a major threat in the region, saying that there was no "organized structure or presence" of the group in Pakistan and that IS groups in Afghanistan were simply local Pakistani Taliban splinter groups with no connection to Iraq and Syria that had opted to rebrand in an attempt to raise money.

This article originally appeared on CNN.

COMMENTS (3)

cueball | 5 years ago | Reply @zakiurlakhvi:
No US President is willing to challenge the US State Dept. policies towards Pakistan
Anti American blather always gets through moderators but seldom has substance. The Secretary of State is selected by the President of the USA - nuff said?
curious2 | 5 years ago | Reply Aziz is correct. . After the primaries the candidates of both parties will try to appeal to the Independents (who represent over 40 percent of the voters) by modifying their positions and moving towards the political center. . Also - the President of the USA has no ability to exclude Muslims from the USA and you won't find anything on your VISA application where it asks your religion. The President does have the ability to turn away Syrian war refugees - that's because under International law the USA isn't obligated to take war refugees from the Middle East.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read