PML-N reorganisation: Fourth deadline expires

In Nov, Sharif said PML-N would elect new office-bearers in six weeks.


Zia Khan January 18, 2011
PML-N reorganisation: Fourth deadline expires

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has recently emerged strong enough to force the government to agree to its terms on critical national issues, but the party appears to be far from overcoming internal divisions to complete a lingering reorganisation in more than 16 months.

Former premier Nawaz Sharif announced after a meeting here in early November that the party would be through with the process of electing new office-bearers at district, provincial and national levels in six weeks.

But more than 10 weeks since then there hasn’t been any apparent headway in the party’s reorganisation drive despite the fact that Sharif himself jumped into the process to bring leaders with diverging opinions to common grounds.

It was in September 2009 that Sharif dissolved all the structures of his league all over Pakistan with an announcement to reorganise them through intra-party elections within six months.

But over a year later, there hasn’t been much progress and the party, the second largest of the country, seems miles away from what it was supposed to accomplish by March this year.

At least three deadlines for electing new office bearers for the party’s local, provincial and national organisations — March 23, August 14 and September 30 — have so far been missed in the last one year alone. And the new year doesn’t seem any luckier for Sharif.

Though the top leaders of PML-N attribute missing of the latest deadline to the volatility the country politics has been going through recently, some officials say there is a lot more hindering the efforts to give the group a new look.

And a fear of further delay is keeping the party from announcing another cut-off date, though Sharif has asked an inner circle of his close associates to complete the process, at least till provincial levels, by end next month (February).

Published in The Express Tribune, January 18th,  2011.

COMMENTS (8)

Zartashia Tariq | 13 years ago | Reply In its list of demands, the PML-N has told the PPP to reverse inflation but has failed to put forward any plan. If it expects the economic woes of Pakistan to be dismissed with a snap of the PPP’s fingers, it labours under a delusion. It further stated that a 30 percent cut in government spending be immediately initiated. Has it told the public why this odd figure has been chosen? We would all like to see POL prices reduced but has the PML-N charted out how the government will meet the budget deficit without this and the RGST? If the PML-N is so people-friendly, we implore it to outline its plans. We also hope it can show some sensitivity in the future. It seems that PML-N is playing double game on one side it is hard to win the popular support while on the other hand it is paving its way for the next term. PML-N has nothing to do with the country and people, if it was so sincere why it did not play to bring prosperity and key changes during its two time term. In fact the time PML_N ruled was the worst ever days in the history of Pakistan that can be marked as an era of corruption, personal vendetta, political victimization and exploitation of people. PML-N is once again playing chess game to quench its thirst.
Arshad Jamal Butt | 13 years ago | Reply Impartial analysis is that regarding IPP,s and RPP,s that was biggest blunder done by PPP Govt. because IPP,s can work through oil and when oil prices changes in international market electricity prices hikes automatically. Solution should be that PPP or any Govt. should work on (hydroelectric power plant) Dams and they could also make reservoirs for water shortage in dams and it is cheapest electricity source but you can not make huge commissions through those projects which are purely a benefit to people of Pakistan. Second option could be electricity generation through coal & we have largest reserves of coal but what we have done on that? Answer is nothing. For instance, Japan has zero natural resources this country is largest importer of oil and coal but can you compare Pakistan with Japan in progress? Actually difference is lack of sincere and dedicated leadership.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ