Vulgarity is hallmark of US presidential race

Published: January 28, 2016
A general view of the White House in Washington

A general view of the White House in Washington

WASHINGTON: The 2016 White House race has turned into a bleeping profanity fest.

Rand Paul has used obscenities. Jeb Bush has tested out some four-letter words. Even mild mannered Ben Carson, in a nationally televised debate packed with rival Republicans, dismissed government subsidies as a “bunch of crap.”

But the king of the curses has been Donald Trump, the celebrity billionaire atop the Republican heap whose trash talk has taken US politics to a new low.

Pataki drops out of US presidential race

Not only has he raised the profile of the outsider candidate, he appears to have made profanity and, more significantly, coarse personal attacks, acceptable elements of the campaign lexicon.

In November, Trump said he would “bomb the shit out of” Islamic State extremists, to wild applause.

Asked whether he would bring back water-boarding against terror suspects, he leaned on his lectern, looked out at the crowd and said “you bet your ass I would.”

Senator Rand Paul in November accused defenders of mass government surveillance of touting “bullshit.”

Bush, seen as a more even-tempered statesman, has gotten in on the act too.

“We are Americans, damn it!” he proclaimed, somewhat unnecessarily, in New Hampshire.

Honoring Holocaust heroes, Obama warns against rise of intolerance

Even avuncular Senator Bernie Sanders has blurted out salty language, telling Democratic rival Hillary Clinton that he was sick of “hearing about your damn emails.”

But their foul-mouthed excesses pale in comparison to The Donald’s vitriolic personal attacks.

Trump’s Twitter feed is a perpetual insult generator. This week he called conservative pundit Glenn Beck “dumb as a rock.” Others are labeled “clown,” “moron” and “stupid.”

On Tuesday Trump blasted Ted Cruz, his closest GOP competitor, as a “liar” who just “looks like a jerk.”

His sexist language has been notable, particularly when he said Clinton “got schlonged” by Obama in their 2008 nomination battle — coining an obscene neologism from a Yiddish term for penis.

The demeaning rhetoric is a worry, according to University of Pennsylvania linguistics professor Mark Liberman.

“Those are more striking, frankly, than the (obscenities),” he told AFP.

“Those are things that I noticed, and I think many people are like me in this respect.”

Hillary responds to question on Islamophobia with severe criticism of Trump

National US publications like the New Yorker readily print the “F” word, and cable television and the Internet has largely desensitized Americans to vulgar language.

“Most of these words have lost most of their impact, and so nobody really notices, except maybe to chalk it up to (Trump’s) generally more straightforward and unfiltered way of talking,” Liberman explained.

Machismo could also be playing its part in a crowded race. And Trump’s tell-it-like-it-is bluster helps convey an impression of strength in the face of Russia’s Vladimir Putin or militants.

Previous campaigns have seen their share of profanity. Republican 2008 nominee John McCain could turn a phrase, as could president Richard Nixon.

But the vulgarity and aggression on this year’s campaign trail appear to have reached new heights.

Some have been all too eager to fight fire with fire.

In December, low-polling Senator Lindsey Graham, fuming over Trump’s command of the race, offered succinct advice on CNN for how to make America great:

“Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.”

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (1)

  • Jan 28, 2016 - 12:58PM

    We intend to tell the GLOBE that we were dead RIGHT; while going to WAR in the Middle-East. It was not for any self gain of any but for protecting the Earth from an imminent collapse. Although the ‘aim and objective’ is not exactly met with till now in view of entering of vested interests into the scene; we are still in the correct ROAD, uninfluenced from Quarters. This is an information all should know of; prior to conduct of current Election. The result might come in favour of USA at any time in the future and PUBLIC of USA should support the action; so undertaken by erstwhile President BUSH. Recommend

More in World