Entire Kashmir belongs to India: Vikas Swarup

India raises concerns over Pakistan's attempt to convert Gilgit-Baltistan into a separate province


News Desk January 15, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

In a strong reaction to reports of Pakistan converting Gilgit-Baltistan to a fifth province, India claimed on Thursday said the entire Kashmir is an integral part of India.

"We have seen recent media reports stating that various options are under consideration in Pakistan regarding the political status of Gilgit-Baltistan. India's position is crystal clear on this. The entire state of Jammu and Kashmir which includes areas currently under Pakistan's occupation is an integral part of Union of India," External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Vikas Swarup said, according to NDTV.

Gilgit-Baltistan — part of Pakistan by choice

Pakistan is mulling upgrading the constitutional status of its northern Gilgit-Baltistan region, which is also claimed by India, in a bid to provide legal cover to a multi-billion-dollar Chinese investment plan, officials said last week.

The move could signal a historic shift in Pakistan’s position on the future of the wider Kashmir region, observers have said, dealing another potential blow to fragile peace talk efforts that received a boost after India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Lahore in December.

Swarup said that India's concerns are regarding “exploitation of resources”, while adding that the implementation of economic projects in AJK are well known and have been shared with all countries and organisations concerned.

Foreign secretaries meeting: Islamabad, New Delhi reschedule talks

Pakistan's Foreign Office spokesperson in June, last year rejected India’s statement claiming the entire Jammu and Kashmir, including Gilgit and Baltistan, are an integral part of India, saying the country is unlawfully occupying territories in the region.

“Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute, pending final settlement through a free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices, as enshrined in numerous UN Resolutions,” Khalilullah said.

“Under these resolutions no material change is allowed, yet India, in complete violation of these resolutions, calls it a state of the union,” he added.

Kashmir is an unfinished agenda of partition: Army chief

Addressing India slamming Gilgit-Baltistan polls held on June 8, the Foreign Office spokesperson termed it an “interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan.”

India said the G-B elections were “an attempt by Pakistan to camouflage its forcible and illegal occupation of the regions.”

However, Khalilullah responded, “It is actually India which is unlawfully occupying the territories of Jammu and Kashmir.”

This article originally appeared on NDTV.

COMMENTS (13)

Rabbani | 8 years ago | Reply @G. Din And yet when Hyderabad's Nizam chose to stay independent, as sovereign as he was, India mounted an all-out invasion. Just because India surrounded the Hyderabad state does not justify an invasion, or does it ? The argument of "sovereigns" making the decisions is all hogwash. India has used force for annexation whenever it knows it outnumbers the "sovereign" nations. Besides, didn't the UK just give Scottish people the right to determine whether they want to be part of the unitary state ? You know why ? Because the sentiment of secession is prevalent which has strong political roots and mass support. Irrespective of what happened in the referendum, a free and fair referendum was carried. out since it is the right of the people to determine their future. So your argument about people having no say in the matter is ridiculously wrong at best. A classic case of conveniently avoiding the facts that do not help your propaganda.
G. Din | 8 years ago | Reply @Kashmiri: "Why don’t kashmiris have any say in this?" For exactly the same reasons that people of territories purchased by US from France under "Louisiana Purchase" had no say in the matter. And the same goes for Alaska, Hawaii, California and every such case where sovereignty changed hands all through history. Nearer home, no one asked Indians when Mughals took over. Repeat after me: "Sovereignty changes hands only between sovereigns, period." In your case, sovereigns involved were Maharaja Hari Singh and the Government of India. Even Pakistan was not allowed to strong-arm its way into the arrangement.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ