Fighting for a progressive Pakistan

The country had many problems, as it has had since its very inception.


Naveen Naqvi January 10, 2011
Fighting for a progressive Pakistan

Ten years ago, Pakistan was a different place. The country had many problems, as it has had since its very inception, but it was not somewhere a man would fire 40 bullets at an unarmed man’s back and be lauded as a hero. In the Pakistan of today there are rows of security checkpoints at every major street of the federal capital, and yet we feel unsafe — constantly asking for more police officers — who it seems will shoot us in our backs.

But then again, it was only 10 years ago that September 11 happened and the US waged two wars against Muslim majority countries, creating a world of increasing polarisation full of fear, suspicion and conspiracy. It also began the bombing of its most loyal ally, Pakistan, making drone attacks a daily occurrence.

Three decades ago, Pakistan was even more different, for the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan had not yet come to pass, leading to the propping of the brutal military dictator Ziaul Haq, who left us with the absurd blasphemy laws that exist now. Five decades ago, the pictures we see of this land bear no relation to the world outside my window. That was before 1971, when, through our own follies, we lost a chunk of ourselves and the nation was thrown into doubt over its very identity, the two-nation theory, the need for a separate homeland for Muslims. It was only after this that legislation was passed, during Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s time, declaring Ahmadis ‘non-Muslims’.

All those things did happen and this is the Pakistan of today. However, it is also true that facts can change. In response to PPP MNA Sherry Rehman’s submission of a bill to amend the blasphemy laws, the religious parties announced two rallies — on December 31 and January 9. The turnout at the first was unimpressive and the strike ineffectual, especially in Lahore. According to news reports, the second attracted around 40,000 people. The glorification by Islamist parties and mainstream media outlets of Governor Salmaan Taseer’s assassin, Mumtaz Qadri, bolstered support
for him.

As for those on the other side, those who want a change in the law, they know that they are vulnerable when they stand together and claim public space. They are painfully and mournfully aware of their vulnerability — but that has not stopped hundreds from coming out every day. We cannot believe that the possibility of a progressive Pakistan was laid to rest with the murdered politician. Certainly his daughter, Shehrbano Taseer, does not espouse that when she wrote in The New York Times, “We buried a heroic man, not the courage he inspired in others.” We cannot let his death
go to waste.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 11th, 2011.

COMMENTS (51)

asim | 13 years ago | Reply my dear pakistan.......................we all love this country nd all know its importance.my suggestions to all of u is try to learn the reasons and details involved in anti sate activities.correct yourself and than others.we all claim to be intellects but forget the basics.develop yourself in a position to criticise..give respect to your institutions and pillars..........lets come out of this state of criticism...........adjust yourself to positives.this country is in a state of national disaster.................come out with the positive side of mirror.........................thx and i respect u alllll
Mir Askari Abbas | 13 years ago | Reply @ram....... my dear let this discussion end up here......as everybody knows whats happening in India as well.....we actually really don't see any news website or headlines of any Indian newspaper....and even we still know whats happening in different parts of india...whats happening in Assam and how the indian army and police brutally kill the villagers of that area, how indian army is killing people in kashmir, how they are treating the Maoist. so my dear the point is that we should understand our common enemy, who is currently having the same imperialistic approach. We must think positive and together we must have to realize it. In this scenario we must not think ourselves as individuals living in a particular area, we all are humans first then there is any religion, so no need to mention religion over here.....who is killing and is being killed...both are human....and if you don't have pain for humanity then nobody has any right to say himself or herself as the follower of any specific religion...because i haven't read in any religion, who allow the killings of innocent people....so we have to condemn the killings going anywhere in this world......OK.... my dear Ram.....?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ