Saudi posts record $98 billion deficit in 2015: ministry

The International Monetary Fund had projected the 2015 deficit to be around $130 billion


Afp December 28, 2015
PHOTO: REUTERS

RIYADH: OPEC kingpin Saudi Arabia posted a record $98 billion budget deficit in 2015 due to the sharp fall in oil prices, the finance ministry said on Monday.

Revenues were estimated at 608 billion riyals ($162 billion), well below projections and 2014 income, while spending came in at 975 billion riyals ($260 billion), ministry officials announced at a press conference in Riyadh.

The budget deficit is the highest in the history of Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter, but was not as big as some expected.

Global politics and economy under stress

The International Monetary Fund had projected the 2015 deficit to be around $130 billion and other reports also put it above $100 billion.

It was the second deficit year in a row for Saudi Arabia and Riyadh is expected to announce another shortfall when it unveils its 2016 budget later on Monday.

The kingdom has seen a sharp drop in revenues as oil prices have fallen by more than 60 per cent since mid-2014 to below $40 a barrel.

Financial war against the IS

Public revenues are the lowest since 2009, when oil prices dived as a result of the global financial crisis.

Income for 2015 was 15 per cent lower than projections and 42 per cent less than in 2014.

Alliance against terror: Islamabad backs Saudi coalition, with caution

Oil income has normally contributed around 90 per cent of total revenues.

Riyadh maintained high spending this year, and launched an expensive military intervention in Yemen, by tapping into the huge fiscal reserves it accumulated when oil prices were high.

COMMENTS (1)

Fayez | 8 years ago | Reply About time for Arab states to drop no tax policy and stop feeding it's residents. This strategy was flawed from day one
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ