A discourse on creativity

Writing fiction is akin to erecting a temple of consecrated ideas which, like religious convictions, should be sacrosanct for the author.

Taha Kerar August 11, 2010
Writing fiction is akin to erecting a temple of consecrated ideas which, like religious convictions, should be sacrosanct for the author. However, it is disconcerting to note how this analogy can be brazenly distorted to signify that the essential quality of a literary work is in the framework of ideas inherent in its plot. Such a line of reasoning casts aside the importance of stylistic merit and hence, it can be argued, that literature which presents strong ideas without much sophistication, is a weak portrayal of the author’s flair for creativity. Literary creativity is a two-pronged concept that entails both the profundities of expression and the richness of ideas.

Pakistani fiction in English has packaged creativity with much ingenuity. The region has produced writers who have tackled the two-fold notion of creativity with great ingenuity. This set of writers does not only subsume those who have received international acclaim but also includes those who have been published locally.

However, there is an attitude of complacence in some Pakistani writers, particularly with regard to their stylistic persuasions. Owing to the restive urge to write speedily, literary works by some of these writers are, more often than not, devoid of the originality that comes from introspection. They use written words as a motif for expressing ideas without placing due emphasis on literary sophistication that offers the reader insight into the writer’s personality. As a result, the ideas become stale and fail to reflect the passion with which the author has penned the literary work.

For instance, upon reading Khadija Khan’s The Mind of Q, I was astonished to find that her compact ideas had not been enshrined through inventive prose. In fact, I felt that she had blithely executed the range of her ideas, rendering the book a tiresome read. More significantly, I was disquieted by the following sentence:
‘Questa made frequent use of The Calculator that had been eternally fixed into her brain – not to make general additions and subtractions – but to assess the precise probability of the result that may have occurred if she were to go ahead with a certain decision.’

Although the originality of the sentence is intact, there is still a pressing need to refine the blandness with which it is fashioned. The analogy may read like a metaphor but it stifles the impulse of creativity by restricting the complexity of the mind to a mere mathematical precision. My detractors may argue that the notion of likening the mind to a calculator is pertinent in that particular stage of the plot, but they must also comprehend that there are more insightful analogies that the writer could have expressed herself.

This goes to show that the literary scene in Pakistan is encountering three detrimental problems: Firstly, there is a dearth of innovation and stylistic techniques are still very archaic and unappealing. Secondly, the writers themselves are averse to tapping their true stylistic potential which has rendered their ideas numb and dreary. Lastly, there is an infinitesimal degree of thought given by writers to the possibility of acquainting their literary aspirations with their personal motives and values lest their work is dubbed sentimental.

These concerns can only be addressed by editors who should try to offer sound advice on how to improve and ‘personalise’ a literary work in such a way that creativity is retained.
WRITTEN BY:
Taha Kerar A blogger on social events and has previously worked as Assistant Editor for a media magazine. He is currently pursuing Law Studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies. He tweets @TahaKehar.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (14)

retrograde | 10 years ago | Reply about the writer, I meant
retrograde | 10 years ago | Reply @cynic: You've missed the point of the piece. I recommend a more feasible attempt to understand the writer's point as against prejudging things. And yes, you haven't discouraged the writer one bit. That's the best thing.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ