The (not so) long arm of the HEC

Does the HEC monitor schools controlled by the military? I'm afraid it doesn't and that's why propaganda exists.

Nadir Eledroos April 08, 2011
The Higher Education Commission’s (HEC) devolution has pulled emotions and inflamed passions for the past couple of weeks.

We are told that the future of Pakistan and the future of higher education are at stake.

However, I for one do not believe that the HEC is a barometer of the state of education in Pakistan.

On the contrary, the case of Qamar Riaz Mamitkhel, a lecturer at Bahria University Islamabad points to how inadequate the provision of education in our country is.

If we ever needed a snapshot of where we stand, look no further.

Mr Qamar Riaz Mamitkhel had the audacity to question the role of retired military officials in his university.

For his comments, he was restrained by the institutions security personnel and removed from the auditorium.

All of this happened in the presence of none other than HEC chairman Javaid Laghari.

This follows the case of a lecturer at National University of Modern Languages (NUML) who was beaten up by a retired Brigadier.

The question here is this: does the HEC or any state body for that matter have the authority to monitor educational organisations affiliated with the military?

Is the HEC able to maintain quality controls and the high standards that it sets itself in institutions such as National University of Science and Technology, Bahria University, Air University, National Defence University and NUML?

If an academic can be silenced and bullied in the presence of the HEC chairman, what hope do we have of encouraging and developing critical thinking, debate and innovation in education centres across the country?

Between politicians’ fake degrees and retired army officers granting themselves PhDs at NUML, we have seen and heard of it all.

Education at every level in Pakistan has been reduced to passing exams and attaining certificates. What actually takes place in the classroom or lecture hall is of little concern to bureaucrats, generals, administrators and entrepreneurs.

Education cannot and must not be an instrument of propaganda. If we concede that certain issues such as the military are above debate and criticism in universities then with or without the HEC, devolved or centralised, we have already failed the many thousands of students who fill lecture halls across the country.

Silencing questions and comments on such topics silences valid counter arguments regarding the positive role of such interference.

Mr Mamitkhel and his students are now holding lessons beneath a tree outside Bahria University.

The “administrators”, the retired admiral’s and such are above account. If we want to reduce education to certificates, and university to an extension of primary school, where lessons are held, exams are sat and results issued, then the status-quo is perhaps acceptable.

Yet if this is an ideal state and acceptable form of higher education, then why is it that the same bureaucrats, military officials, administrators and entrepreneurs send their own children to the “undisciplined” and free thinking universities in the West?
WRITTEN BY:
Nadir Eledroos Nadir teaches Economics at Bellerbys College, London and is interested in Pakistani politics and current affairs. He tweets @needroos (https://twitter.com/needroos)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (31)

Nida Mushtaq | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend A systematic campaign, backed by a section of the media, seems to have been orchestrated by the HEC, its former chief the self-praising Dr Atta-ur-Rahman and its main beneficiaries, namely some vice chancellors, a student body and teachers associations, who ironically were the most rabid critics of the HEC and had been demanding that the HEC must go, against the devolution of the HEC. The HEC’s tall claims are questionable and there has been no qualitative improvement in the sector of higher education in the last 10 years, despite massive funding. There has been no research worth international patent value, there has been a very minimal increase in the ranking of Pakistani universities at the world level, education in Pakistan has seen only half-baked projects and frequently changed academic policies, there has been undue and dictatorship-like interference in the autonomy of universities and the state has discouraged a vast majority of students and teachers by imposing policies de-linked from ground realities. Let the provinces develop setups and do all the jobs that had previously been taken care of by the HEC. I am sure foreign funds are given to Pakistan, not to the HEC, so funds will go to the provinces. Let devolution work, and let universities and colleges get autonomy.
sabz | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend how can those who only know how to manage fleets, fly helicopters and ride in submarines run a university?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ