No 'Muslim' can attack Data Darbar?

For the literalists, or more specifically for Wahabis, Sufis and their shrines are unislamic and those who visit these places are idolaters and they should be killed to purify the “Umma”. For Wahabis Shiism, Sufism and rationalism corrupt Islam and the duty of the Wahabi believer is to eliminate these elements to purify Islam to restore it to its original form.

Shams Hamid July 08, 2010
“No Muslim can attack Data Darbar” Rehman Malik said echoing one of the earliest debates of Muslim civilisation: whether a Muslim who killed another remains a Muslim or not.

There were three answers to this debate.

The first one coming from the Kharjites (Literalists) claiming that the Muslim who killed another Muslim is no longer a Muslim.

Murjites (One of the earliest sects of Islam to believe in the postponement of judgement) believed that a Muslim remains a Muslim even after killing another Muslim.

Mutazalites (rationalists) took a middle position saying that the status of a Muslim killing another Muslim is neither of a Muslim nor a “Kafir” instead they acquire a middle position of a “fasiq”.

Therefore, one of the recognised suicide bombers of Data Darbar, Usman, will be considered “Kafir” by the literalists; ironically the same group he committed this heinous act for.

For the literalists, or more specifically Wahabis, Sufis and their shrines are unislamic and those who visit these places are idolaters and they should be killed to purify the “Ummah”. For Wahabis Shiism, Sufism and rationalism corrupt Islam and the duty of the Wahabi believer is to eliminate these elements to purify Islam to restore it to its original form. Wahabis enforced their literalist interpretation of Islam on all the Muslims calling them unbelievers if they choose any other interpretation like that of Hanfi, Shafii and Maliki. Those Muslims, who did not accept their teachings, were considered liable to be killed.

Hanfi and Maliki called Wahabis modern day ‘Kharji’ because Kharjites were the pioneers of coercing Muslims to accept their brand of Islam or die, totally disregarding Quranic injunction that “there is no coercion in religion” (“la ikraha fiddin” Quran, Surah Baqrah, Ayah 256).

Wahabis and the Taliban mimic the coercive practices of ‘Kharjites’ in implementing their teachings. Isutzu writes that Kharjis spoke with their sword without mercy and they often spoke.

Al Qaeda follows the rigid, literalist and violent teachings of Wahabism that is the state religion of the royal kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The family of Sauds, Wahabis, and the British formed an alliance against the powerful Ottoman Empire of Muslims. The Saud Royal Family wanted the kingdom of Arab for themselves, Wahabis wanted to implement their narrow brand of Sharia by throwing out Muslim Turks of the Ottoman Empire from Arab, and the British Empire desired to defeat the Ottoman Empire that was threatening Europe. This unholy alliance proved successful and the British defeated the Ottoman Empire, Royal Saud Family gained the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Wahabis implemented their invented brand of Shariah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Since 1975 the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has spent more than $100 billion in spreading Wahabis literalist, a-historic, violent and “takfir” (Practice of calling those Muslims ‘Kafir’ who do not practice Wahabism) based interpretation of Islam to convert 98 per cent Muslims, who do not accept their narrow brand of Islam, by establishing mosques and Madrassas.

There are thousands of Saudi funded Madrassas in Pakistan where children are taught Wahabism and their violent ways based on “Takfir” hermeneutics. They are taught that anyone not following their literalist interpretation of Islam is a non-believer and if they do not change their ways they should be killed. Most of the Maddrassa students are poor and they live in those Madrassa dorms without any contact with their family on a daily basis. Those students are most vulnerable, and they have to obey the administrators who terrorise them to become suicide bombers.

The suicide rate in Pakistan is rising because of poverty and indecent living conditions. The problem is definitely poverty and unavailability of opportunities, lack of employment and rising commodity prices. However, the regular non-madrassa going poor people kill themselves instead of becoming ‘suicide bombers’.

We need to reform Madrassa education and most importantly we need to make it incumbent on Madrassa students to live with their family so that they can stay in touch with their families every day. Pakistani mainstream public education is also spreading militancy but their students live with their family and, perhaps, for this reason we do not see poor public school students becoming suicide bombers.

There are 1.57 billion Muslims in the world with 10-13 per cent Shia, and the rest are Sunni Muslims. The Sunni Muslims are further divided into around 40 per cent Hanfi, around 30 per cent Shafii, around 15 per cent Maliki and around 5 per cent Hanbali. Wahabis are less than 2 per cent and they consider the 98 per cent Muslims to be unbelievers. We need to send them a clear message that they will only be considered a part of 1.57 billion Muslims if they learn to live and accept the rest as believers as well.
WRITTEN BY:
Shams Hamid Analysis and intellectual discourse from Toronto based Research Fellow at the Centre of Critical Qualitative Health Research, University of Toronto
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (30)

mansoor | 10 years ago | Reply But if u are doing such acts your are doing BIDAAT n SHIRK "BESHAQ SHIRK ZULM-E-AZEEM HAI " and i have couted another HADEES read it http://qurango.com/images/40/5.jpg We can just pray for those PEER FAKEER they are really good followers of ISLAM but they can neither help you nor listen what is in your heart else than ALLAH. AGAIN HERE YOU ARE WRONG WHO TOLD YOU THAT AHLE-HADEES enforced their literalist interpretation of Islam on all the Muslims calling them unbelievers if they choose any other interpretation like that of Hanfi, Shafii and Maliki. Those Muslims, who did not accept their teachings, were considered liable to be killed. What are you talking about i dont know why an educated person like you think this type of misconception tell me have you ever heard the name of LASHKAR-E-TAIBA the only jamaat in asia whos is doind JIHAAD in IRAQ,KASHMIR,AFGHANISTAN and BOSNIA Have you ever heard that this jamaat is engaging in such a behaviour which you are talking about ??? you have talked about the madrassa's that they are taugh WAHABISM and anyone not following their literalist interpretation of Islam is a non-believer and if they do not change their ways they should be killed and more you have talked about making them suicide bombers. Tell me in which madrassa you have visited and they are teaching such behaviours ????? i will tell you the biggest madrassa of AHLE-HADEES in MUREEDKAY near LAHORE where you can see what are the teachings of AHLE-HADEES i hope you will definitely impressed and your concepts were corrected ISLAM doesnot believe on quantity and mojority ISLAM believes on strong arguments according to QURAN HADEES and SUNNAH I HOPE THAT ALLAH GIVES YOU AND ME HIDAAYAT AND TO FOLLOW ALLAH N HIS PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SAW) TEACHINGS
Bilal Salim | 10 years ago | Reply This article is such a paradox .. It teaches hatred and violence (see the closing lines) while superficially denouncing them.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ