The Paris attacks are an act of war – against Islam itself

From Pakistan to Paris, notice must be served to the Islamists: Muslims, i.e. real Muslims, are coming for you.

Qanta Ahmed November 17, 2015
The appalling attacks in Paris were, as Francois Hollande said, an ‘act of war’. They were Islamism’s declaration of war on free society – but, crucially, they represented something else. An act of war, by Islamists, upon Islam itself.

As Douglas Murray says, it is lazy and wrong to argue that these attacks had nothing to do with Islam. The repugnant creed of the Islamic State (IS) is certainly related to Islam – but it is also inimical to IslamThe scenes in Paris will shock Muslims world over; indeed, when we Muslims hear of gunmen shouting “Allahu Akbar before committing the very acts of murder explicitly prohibited by the Quran, our repugnance is joined with a sense of desecration.

To assert that this Islamism is un-Islamic is not a kneejerk response to the atrocities we saw in Paris, and so many times around the world. It is the only conclusion that can be drawn after serious consideration of its principles. The Damascene Muslim scholar, Bassam Tibi, identifies six tenets of Islamism – all quite new, and none can be honestly described as Islamic.

1. Seeking a new world order through a new dictatorial global ‘caliphate’. (It matters little that the word ‘dawla’ — Islam as state — appears nowhere in the 80,000-word document that we accept as the revealed Quran.)

2. The establishment of Islamism within democracies – Islamists are keen to stand for election, but once they get into power they want to shut the democratic gate behind them.

3. Positioning Jews as Islam’s chief enemy, thereby making anti-Semitism central to the Islamist project (as Hamas’s founding charter attests).

4. The mutation of classical jihad into terrorist jihadism — with which the world has, alas, become all too familiar.

5. Shariah law. Not sharia as described by the Quran, but a concocted version used to impose a form of totalitarian rule which is without historical precedent. As the Islamic State regularly demonstrates, mercy has no place within Islamists’ version of shariah. In his searing study of the subject, the British lawyer Sadakat Kadri makes the critical observation that ‘pitiless punishment’, while lacking in Islam itself, has found a comfortable home in much of the Islamist world. Medieval barbarity has become a modern-day reality across much of the modern Muslim world — except that such punishment was unusual even in medieval times. Kadri notes that in five centuries of documented Ottoman legal history, there is only one record of a stoning to death.

6. The Islamists’ concept of purity and authenticity. Any challenge to Islamism is, to them, de facto evidence of an un-Islamic behaviour. As Professor Tibi puts it, this is what makes Islamism ‘a totalitarian ideology poised to create a totalitarian state’ on a par with Nazism and Leninism.
‘Given that Muslims constitute more than a quarter of humanity,’ he concludes, the tension ‘between civil Islam and Islamist totalitarianism matters to everyone’.

So this is a new ideology, a form of totalitarianism – and one that has its ideological source not in medieval Islam but 20th century fascism. They dress in the robes of ancient Islam, but the methods and the ideology are terrifyingly modern. The Islamic State, with its easy control of social media, is the most modern incarnation yet.

The Islamic State’s brutality against anyone it encounters – Egyptians, Jordanians, Iraqis or Syrians – has been a reminder to the Muslim world that Islamism is not just directed at westerners. It’s also a reminder of why the animus against Islamism is rising — holding out the prospect of real reform. Crucially, the jihadis are losing the argument. Ten years ago, a Pew poll found that 41 per cent of Pakistani Muslims said that suicide bombings were sometimes justified. Now, it’s down to three per cent.

This is the moment for the Islamic world to expose Islamism — but loosening its hold upon our faith falls upon those Muslims who value pluralism and pursue a civilised, enlightened Islam. The reformation many are calling for isn’t needed of Islam, but rather of Muslims — and specifically of Muslim leadership.

So we must name the beast, and do so with conviction. This is not just about weeding out a jihadi menace from Birmingham schools, but about giving millions of Muslims the chance for a peaceful coexistence with the rest of humanity. And it’s about persuading non-Muslims that the Islamists are wrong — that such coexistence is possible.

Muslims are reminded by the Quran that to each people is sent ‘a Law’ and ‘a Way’ and that Muslims should not judge people of other faiths in the light of their own. Instead, the People of the Book must judge themselves by their own revealed texts (‘unto you your religion, and unto me my religion’) as we worship the same God. The Quran teaches that Moses and Aaron are to be revered for their courage in the face of merciless rule. The Torah and the Gospel are to be honoured.

From the Pakistani bad lands to the banlieues of Paris, notice must be served to the Islamists: Muslims — that is to say, real Muslims — are coming for you.

The post originally appeared on The Spectator here.
Qanta Ahmed A British Muslim who is the author of 'In the Land of Invisible Women: A Female Doctor’s Journey in the Saudi Kingdom' and a physician. She tweets @MissDiagnosis (
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.


Nana | 8 years ago | Reply Not surprising, eh? Human psychology. As long as you are not personally affected ,it does not matter. But when you are scared by it then you start thinking of taking care of it. As long as IS, mainly supported by US, Saudi Arabia and the West, was wrecking havoc on Syrians and Iraqis where millions were either displaced or died, it didn't matter.But When it hit Paris, a resolution was passed in UNO to tackle it on proper basis no matter what. Human psychology!
Guy | 8 years ago Since when did US support IS. If they were not attacking IS what they were doing in Iraq, Syria doesn't mean they were backed. Aren't we a typical believer of conspiracy theories that spin all the time & let's say even if the IS is supported by US why would they attack West fearing a backlash (keeping the mind the Al Qida story which also is said to be backed by US). Moreover one has to be fool enough to be played into hands of someone. Inner inconsistencies cannot be blamed on others. And as far as conspiracy theorists goes it's a big business these days. All you need to do is open up your mind.
Gul,h | 8 years ago | Reply Why so much of cover up to find a reason for the incidents? Are we feeling guilty that we need to really sort out the problems in religion ? Writing so many articles and blogs stating it is not islam at fault only shows our insecurity and that something is wrong with religion!!
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ