The ‘firebrand press conference’ phenomenon

Treating the public like they can't tell between evidence and a photocopied dhaaba menu isn’t the way to go about it.

Heba Islam September 18, 2012
It all started out with Zulfiqar Mirza, and the trend has spread like fire through the upper echelons of our political elite: what I like to refer to as the ‘firebrand press conference’ phenomenon.

Every couple of weeks (or so it appears) a member of one political party or another calls an ever-hungry media to an event which promises to reveal the ‘shocking’ corrupt practices our political leaders indulge in. Karachi was thrown into an uproar in 2011 when Mirza, the former Sindh home minister, furiously waved around an important-looking sheaf of papers claiming to have evidence against Muttahida Qaumi Movement’s (MQM’s) involvement in political violence.

Faisal Raza Abidi from the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) emulated this familiar pattern with accusations against the chief justice’s son, Arsalan Iftikhar. More recently, Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz’s (PML-N's) Khawaja Asif claimed that the not-so new-kid-on-the-block Imran Khan had lost donation money meant for the Shaukat Khanum Hospital in real estate gambling. Pages of ‘hard evidence’ were once again waved around flamboyantly.

Now, just last week, Leader of the Opposition Chaudhry Nisar alleged that President Asif Ali Zardari was using public money to campaign for the next elections and was using ‘fake’ journalists for the purpose. Again, hard proof was cited.

This is not to say that MQM, the President, or Imran Khan have a clean slate. But an allegation is just that – an unproved charge.

Unfortunately, photocopied papers waved across television screens do not constitute proof. Because they don’t constitute proof, the public has the right to remain sceptical.

On the other hand, the public also has the right to access information which provides evidence of public wrongdoing by their elected leaders. If all these political leaders are so certain that they’ve finally figured out where all that money in the national exchequer went, or why a hundred people died in Karachi in a week, publish the information so that the rest of the country has access to more than a few letters flashing across a screen.

Be transparent about how you managed to get your hands on this information in the first place. Take legal action.

As a politician, you have the right to call out other politicians on illegal activities (whether you have a clean slate or not is another story). But treating the public like it doesn’t know the difference between evidence and a photocopied dhaaba menu isn’t the right way to go about it.

Read more by Heba here or follow her on Twitter @hebaislam

Join us on Facebook for blog updates and more!
Heba Islam Heba Islam is a sub-editor at the national desk at Express Tribune. She tweets @hebaislam.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.


shahzad | 11 years ago | Reply @Heba - when you are a public office holder, people have a right to raise questions about corruption and misuse of power. You wrote "This is not to say that MQM, the President, or Imran Khan have a clean slate." which implies that you either forgot to point out the dirty slate of the cj or you think that despite so many wrong doings his slate is totally clean. I don't know what was the purpose of this piece however such articles seem like an attempt to protect the corrupt.
Ali | 11 years ago | Reply A nice one , buh most of the facts are still unanswered like the extrajudicial killing of a particular sect , a man not been called for 16yrs to the court for hearing on the other hand the leader of a banned organization admits tht he ws involved in the killing of ppl of a particular sect buh was not only released but ws called on for hearing though a terrorist court sentenced him death buh the chauhdary courts released him removing tht punishment. .!!
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ