Murad Saeed's degree: Teachers threaten to quit after govt committee recommends sacking UoP VC

Teachers threaten to quit if government goes ahead with recommendations made by govt panel to remove VC


Iftikhar Firdous August 07, 2015
PTI MNA Murad Saeed. PHOTO: ZAFAR ASLAM/EXPRESS

PESHAWAR: The saga of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MNA Murad Saeed’s degree took a new turn on Friday when the Peshawar University’s teacher’s association threatened to quit after a government committee recommended removing the varsity’s vice chancellor to resolve the matter.

MPA Saeed’s degree was challenged when student group Pukhtoon Students Federation accused him of passing his Remote Sensing, Introduction to Environmental Sciences and Ecology papers in one hour.

Saeed subsequently approached the high court. In his petition, the MNA argued that he had attended UoP from 2005 to 2009 for his undergraduate studies and passed all his courses in the said timeframe. The environmental sciences department chairman had issued a course completion certificate on November 26, 2009 and despite repeated attempts, Saeed was informed the varsity administration will send his degree by post. The varsity had later argued that Saeed still needed to clear three papers.

Read: Murad Saeed case: Court told MNA’s BS certificate is sans seal

Later, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government had established a committee, empowering the additional secretary higher education and additional secretary law to probe the matter. However, there was a “split” between the reports from both officials.

A summary forwarded to the K-P CM by the secretary of the Higher Education Department, copies of which are available with The Express Tribune, notes that efforts were made to “develop a consensus” between both reports, but that these efforts “did not succeed”.

The summary of the report holds UoP Vice Chancellor Rasool Jaan responsible, stating that MNA Saeed was deliberately being denied his degree. In his report, secretary education charged the VC with misconduct, advocating his removal under the amended university act of 2015.

Read: Murad Saeed goes to high court to obtain his degree

The summary recommends that the chief minister advise K-P governor, who is also the chancellor of UoP, to sack the vice chancellor Jaan.

The decision, however, was met with opposition in UoP sparking wide spread protests amongst professors at the university on Friday evening,

Jamil Ahmad Chitral, a representative of the Friends group -- which had won the recent Peshawar University Teachers Association (Puta) elections, told The Express Tribune that recommendations made by the secretary were unfair.

“If the government will politicise the education system it will have serious repercussions,” he warned, adding that if the decision is formalised, hundreds of teachers across the province will quit in protest.

“Why does the university of Peshawar, one of the oldest varsities in the country, have to suffer for the degree of a single MNA.”

Other teachers of the university who were contacted were unaware of the decision, but they agreed with Chitrali that if the vice chancellor is removed it will further complicate matters.



COMMENTS (10)

Tahir Awan | 9 years ago | Reply The Vice Chancellor is also not intrested to enact the 2015 amended act, and his fellow Yourid Ahsan Zia Treasurer, Mr. Rashid COE, and others enjoying their offices even illegal but doing all in the best intrest of VC. Further he is also benifeted the said Chitralli particularly provide him 5-6 employee serving PUTA and get salary from UOP FUNDS. While the Income of PUTA hall constructed on UOP properity used for business purpose goes to the Personal Intrest of this group. The paras already taken by DG AUDIT in 2011-12 , 2012-13. But this group tried best to conceal the fact.
Yousaf | 9 years ago | Reply My favorite party PTI against my favorite personality VC UoP. My vote for VC UoP coz he is more principled than PTI.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ