A host of questions arise, not the least of these being that if the government was able to be involved in the payment of ransom for Mr Weinstein, then why was it not able to rescue him as presumably it had more than a vague inkling of where he was? Of equal weight is the question not only of the legitimacy or otherwise of American drone strikes in Pakistan, but the rules of engagement surrounding them. These were recently relaxed by President Obama, according to The Wall Street Journal. Specifically, the CIA operating in Pakistan is no longer required to demonstrate that its targets pose an imminent threat to the US or its interests. Had that exemption not been granted, the CIA would have been required to gather further intelligence before a strike was authorised. All this has only emerged into the public domain on the belated admission of an own-goal by an American drone. Sadly, the questions raised are never likely to have an answer.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 28th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ