The unrealistic demarcation of the subcontinent by former British colonial rulers not only led to a dispute between the two newly-established states i.e., Pakistan and India, but also deprived the Kashmiri people of their just right to self-determination. Since Partition, the Kashmiri people have been striving painstakingly for the basic provision of human rights. Staging protest rallies and demonstrations for different causes has become their routine. Whole generations of Kashmiris are facing aggression and oppression at the hands of Indian troops and other law-enforcement agencies.
Since 1947, Pakistan and India are allocating considerable chunks of their incomes and resources to defence. Over the last six decades, the two countries have fought hot wars, with long periods of icy coldness. They are consistently struggling against each other, and wasting resources in the process. Besides the rulers, the media, the intellectuals and analysts from both sides are seen to be engaged in a heated debate over the issue.
After the two great wars of the last century ended, the world geography changed, with enmities turning into friendships and many countries deciding to bury the hatchet. The Berlin Wall collapsed and the ideologically disintegrated Germans became one nation after half a century marked by fierce hostility. European countries and nations, which remained in confrontation with each other for around a century, eventually became friends. Such sensible integrations led to peace, progress and prosperity.
Like those of the European and Western world, the people of the subcontinent also deserve peace and prosperity. But the Kashmir issue is a major thorn on the road to peace. It is time our rulers, policymakers, intelligentsia and media personnel from both countries help resolve the dispute, which lies in giving the right of self-determination to the Kashmiri people. Let the Kashmiri people decide their destiny on their own. Global forces need to fulfill their responsibility and mediate in this conflict between Pakistan and India.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 5th, 2015.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Human: Half the state want to be seperate and you wont let them , thats a huge number..... Do you really know how many Kashmiri want to be with you ? 2% at best . Mainly because its a shia population and we all know what happens to them over there.
@ajay: Yes we should read how india and its ally -Soviet Union- trained insurgents and fought a proxy war against Pakistan until the war was officially declared.......
Dont know why indians always bring up Balochistan when we talk about Kashmir.......atleast half of the pop of balochistan is Pakhtun who r the most patriotic people in Pakistan while only a small portion of the other half fights against the state..........
sir instead of blaming india for misery of kashmir and pakistani people, you really think and come out your 1947 mindset. you should read wikipedia on topic BangladeshLiberationWar then you will know truth and lies of your politicians and army.
Replace the word Kashmiri with any other statehood people, and in the context of this article, with the word *Baluch+, the article will still resonate the same sentiment. Much of the world we live in today was mapped out not with consent of every people of the land(referendum) but with consent of the political establishment of that time. In J&K, the peaceful valley was disrupted by the invasion of PAK Jihadis at the behest of people who promulgated two nation theory and the rest is well documented.
No one is preventing any people living in J&K to conduct their own business. But claiming that they do not want to work within the rule of law through which J&K came into India and the land belongs to Muslims only (not equally to others who also have been living there and make up equal part of the populace) is Nazism and it is power politics.
Barring the instances where in PAK supported unrest in the region, J&K has been going to poll and the destiny of the people is left to their own hands. Those who were engaged in this power play have destroyed their own culture, art, ethnic makeup, literature and caused misery for their own people and are selfish religious bigots in sheep's clothing. It happened in Europe, and after fifty years they realized the fallacy of this ideology and through their economic dominance they are trying to form a perfect union called EU. In contrast, the founders of modern India formed the same union without economic might, succeeded against all odds, and are going somewhere.
Is any one from other state interfering in religion, speech, daily activities, commerce, movement of Kashmiris, especially those Kashmiri Muslims. If any, it is PAK interference causing untold cultural cleansing in this region. Why no Kashmiri ever speak of those who were affected by their ideology.
Every election in J&K in India is exercise of free will of the people. Because the separatists did not get their way, it did not mean the People are not choosing their destiny. It is the Huriat hooligans who are in the way of common people of the land. Come to the world forum when their is ethnic cleansing, death and destruction, suppression of individual rights (right to speak, freedom of religion, free franchise, gender equality, economic opportunity, political representation, employment) from GoI, then people will listen. The cry of "I am unique" by disgruntled political opportunists and the two nation theory of religious bigots are dead. The world operates under a framework of established law. There will always be those who do not like that framework, but they are minority.
Whether you are a Muslim or non muslim Kashmiri arguing for separation, the question is what are going to achieve on your own that you cannot achieve in the existing framework. Even the salt has to come from Arabian sea, and their is no hydrocarbon in that region for the economy. Can you provide those who live in Ladak on your own?