And for achieving this key objective of theirs, the terrorists depend more on the media rather than on the far and few terror attacks that they execute. That is why they try to make each one of their attacks as dramatically bloody as they can, knowing very well that it would be impossible for the media to ignore the ‘thrillers’. And they add to the drama by calling up media organisations to own up to the attacks. All this makes sensationally saleable copy for the ratings-driven media houses. In the process, they help, without perhaps knowing it, the terrorists to win more recruits among the mentally feeble sections of our youth who have been raised on some mythical versions of so-called Islamic history and at the same time terrorise the whole nation into a state of pathetic pulp.
The media houses that have tried to cover these attacks as professionally as possible so as to defuse their impact on the hearts and minds of the gullible citizens are known to have been taught new lessons on what is professional and what is not. The media, therefore, has remained under severe pressure from these terror outfits and in recent years, the country has won the dubious distinction of being one of world’s most dangerous countries for media practitioners.
Working under all kinds of pressures, mostly from terrorist organisations and not the least from even those who have been promoting and supporting the falsehood of the ‘good’ Taliban and the ‘bad’ Taliban, and those who have been looking the other way as the so-called non-state actors carried out ‘jihad’ in Indian Kashmir, the Pakistani media seemed to have become an unwilling partner in the heinous game of the terrorists. Most media narratives of these terror incidents, like the ones carried out against our security forces and their installations including the GHQ itself as well as air force and navy installations, ISI offices and police training camps, have remained slanted in ways as to inspire the religiously half-baked young minds. At times, the murderous incidents have been presented by our media as if the terrorists are playing the role of the Jack who killed the giant in the famous fable. In our case, unfortunately, the state itself, as well as its agencies, is viewed by these misled youth as the giant.
Over the period in question, the media, under pressure from terror quarters, had started referring to the terrorists not as terrorists but as ‘militants’ or ‘extremists’. And in order to be seen to be presenting both sides of the story, it went to the extent of offering space and time to the attackers of Malala Yousufzai to justify their heinous act which they did by quoting out-of-context religious injunctions. Just imagine how this ‘balanced’ story must have seemed to the credulous sections of our populace in whose eyes the so-called ‘secular’ government enjoyed no moral ascendency compared with the reverential-looking bearded terrorists, justifying their act quoting injunctions from the Holy Book. Recently, even after the 20-point National Action Plan was announced, and the distinction between the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban was removed, some media houses showed scenes in which a hero-like welcome was being accorded to Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, a senior commander of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba, as he was being brought to the courts from his place of detention. Thus, the media, without perhaps knowing what it is doing, has been playing a significantly more lethal role than the automatic weapons in the hands of these terrorists or their suicide jackets, in winning the hearts and minds of our misguided youth. It is now time to stop using this slant and treat each terror story on merit. In this war on terror, there is no other side. There is only one side and that is our side.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The problem with us is that whoever is anti-India is our friend. That includes both national and foreign terrorists living in our country. We may not recognize it but the world does. Until we as a nation, particularly our military and civilian leaders make a paradigm shift towards a pro-Pakistan policy we will be consumed by terrorists living among us. Today's Syria and Yemen can be tomorrow's Pakistan. Incidentally there is a big difference between Pro-Pakistan and anti-India. There is life other than Kashmir.
@John B:
"I am surprised that the author being a journalist espouses the value “There is only one side and that is our side.” "
Excellent comments. The main reason Pakistan has be so thoroughly radicalized is because of systematic and institutionalized brainwashing of the people by the Establishment over the past five decades. The Establishment had prevented open public debates against the many bigoted actions and ideas pushed forward by their planners all in the name of nationalism and security doctrines. Many journalist who dared to expose the ugly face of the Establishment were summarily eliminated by the agencies.
Now, the author advocates more controls over reporting of the truth in order to hide the ugly skeletons let lose by the agencies themselves.
All should recall that about a year ago, ET was running articles on Pakistani terrorist attacks WITHOUT a comment section due to pressures and threats from "Our Brothers" who not appreciate the slant of the comments against them!
I am surprised that the author being a journalist espouses the value "There is only one side and that is our side."
Apparently to get his side of the story the author wants to silence the "others" from telling their side of the story and want to limit the airtime.
If our side of the story has a good appeal, surely the other side of narration will be ignored by the "misguided, feeble minded youth". However, such a defection is not happening and even lawyers side with the "terrorist" action with rose petals.
So it is time to ask why our story is not getting through to the crowd where it matters but militant story is appealing.
Shutting one eye will not make the picture more beautiful.
Sir, your analysis about territory falling into the hands of the ideologically driven is quite on the mark. Once the critical mass is reached, there is no going back. It may already be too late if the mourners at the funerals of hanged terrorist is any guide. TV channels need to act responsibly. When the country's future is at stake, ratings and profits must wait.
Hiding of facts is not going to solve the problem.. Media should act as mirror of the society .irrespective of what it shows ugly or decent face.