He is partly right. A large part of these billions had come in the shape of written-off loans amounting to almost $2 billion, debt rescheduling amounting to $12.5 billion, resulting in cash flow savings of nearly $3 billion through to 2004 and as much as $8 billion in US military assistance that did not appear on the budget books. The US economic assistance during that period amounted to no more than $3 billion. All this was in return for allowing the US to use Pakistan’s airspace and a couple of our air bases, grant of land access to Afghanistan and employment of our army, police and paramilitary units to capture al Qaeda members fleeing from Isaf troops occupying Afghanistan.
And to the IMF, Islamabad had promised, in return, to root out corruption, improve the tax-to-GDP ratio and introduce fiscal discipline. But instead of capitalising on the good times, Pakistan reverted back to its old ways. No efforts were made to use the massive fiscal space made available by the 9/11 related largesse to expand infrastructure, especially the power generation capacity. The proceeds from sales of profitable units were not used, as promised, to retire past debt. On the other hand, since most of these public sector utilities, like the highly profitable Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation and shares of lucrative banks were sold to foreign investors, a lot of foreign exchange started going out in the shape of profit repatriation. Little or no progress was made in introducing Value Added Tax or implementation of a broad-based GST, taxing farm income, expanding the coverage of GST on services, liberalisation of administered prices, determining utilities tariffs, introducing reforms in income tax, power sector and public sector enterprises which are still a considerable drain on budgetary resources. Instead, this generous fiscal space was used to promote consumerism and corruption which resulted in expanding the black economy to almost twice the size of the white economy and almost doubling the oil import bill.
It was not only on the economic front that the Musharraf regime had failed to capitalise when the going was so good; it also failed to take care of the crisis for which he had received such generous help from the world. Instead of nipping the menace of terrorism in the bud, the regime allowed it to flourish. The Punjabi Taliban and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in-the-making had begun launching attacks against our troops and indulging in sectarian massacres. And rather than confronting them with the full force of our army’s might, Musharraf began entering into peace deals with what he described as the ‘good’ Taliban only to further embolden the enemy which kept breaking these accords with impunity. Even the GHQ and the air force and naval installations had come under their attack. And finally, when the May 2013 elections were announced the TTP publicly declared that it would not let the PPP, the ANP and the MQM hold any election rallies. And both, Nawaz Sharif and Imran Khan, by not denouncing and condemning the TTP threat, joined rather circuitously in what can only be described as a pre-poll rigging campaign favouring their respective parties.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 24th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
A very thought provoking and brilliant story as expected of m Zia Ud Din. Few writers mention the impact of Taliban induced rigging and term the trouncing of PPP (otherwise expected) on unpopularity of PPP. Though party was expected to lose but not so badly. May I also raise a question as wether this Taliban threats were engineered by General Pasha with Saudi/ Gulf Money?
It's correct that not enough investments were made in the power sector. But they did make investments in road infrastructure. Some fantastic fly overs and super highways have been constructed so that the 10% of the population that owns a vehicle can enjoy them. Consumer financing was introduced to helpe people acquire cars but they had no way of paying for the fuel so CNG was invented. Gas was diverted from power plants that generate electricity that benefits the entire country to cars that only a small percentage own.
Meanwhile there has been virtually no investment in public transportation for the 90% of the population that don't have cars. We still ride in rickety old buses. Actually it's worse now because they have CNG cylinders that could explode at any time!
Privatization of PTCL and banks were good moves. After seeing the state of PSM and PIA how can you speak in favour of government ownership of businesses? Just so you know the entire oil and gas sector is mired in delinquencies and all those fantastic profits of state owned PSO, OGDCL, S(N)(S)GPL etc. are only on paper. That is one reason why the OGDCL privatization failed. Who is going to invest where there is so much "circular debt"?