Land encroachment case: Court issues non-bailable warrants for former minister

Akhtar Jadoon is accused of illegally taking over land in Keamari to build a hospital


Our Correspondent November 11, 2014

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Thursday issued non-bailable warrants for the arrest of a former provincial minister, Akhtar Hussain Jadoon, over his failure to respond to contempt notices and bailable warrants in proceedings involving litigation over a piece of land.

The bench headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, heard a contempt of court application filed by Karachi Port Trust’s (KPT) estate manager, who alleged that Akhtar had illegally encroached upon land in Jungle Shah Keamari to construct the Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Hospital in violation the court’s stay order.

The applicant said that provincial government had asked KPT to provide a plot in Keamari to construct the hospital. He alleged that provincial authorities unlawfully encroached upon the land after the KPT refused to give it to them.



The estate manager informed the judges that on February 27, 2013, a SHC bench had granted a stay against usurpation of the land. The court was therefore pleaded to initiate contempt proceedings against the former minister for deliberately violating the court order.

On September 5, the court had issued bailable warrants for arrest of Jadoon in sum of Rs100,000 to ensure his attendance after he failed to appear on the court’s notice.

On Tuesday, the former minister was absent and that irritated the judges.

The bench issued non-bailable warrants for his arrest through the SHO concerned to procure his attendance by the next date of hearing.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 12th, 2014.

COMMENTS (1)

zaman | 9 years ago | Reply

Law of the land is spineless against the privileged in Pakistan, once the land is encroached ,it remains encroached whatever type of building is used as an excuse to grab it.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ