Rajdeep is one of India’s most famous journalists and has been on Indian news television since it went private two decades ago. At that time, the English news space was occupied mainly by Prannoy Roy’s New Delhi Television, or NDTV. This company grew from having one show on India’s state-run network, Doordarshan, to then managing a station for Rupert Murdoch’s Star to finally launching its own network.
It was the team that Roy put together, comprising young people, many from India’s elite schools, which today dominates English news channels. Rajdeep was part of that group, and both he and Sagarika, his wife, are from Oxford University. Times Now is run by Arnab Goswami, also an NDTV graduate and also from Oxford. Barkha Dutt, wildly popular in Pakistan as I found out last month when I visited Islamabad with her, today runs NDTV as its editor.
These people, who are all still only in their forties, are more influential and with higher profiles than any of their contemporaries in newspapers. I would say they are more powerful than any journalist has ever been in print in India and they can turn the national debate, about which more later.
Because of this, and deservedly so, they make more money than people who work in print. Salaries at their level in television approach a half million US dollars a year or so and then there are stock options for some of them. Television journalism is a tough trade to practice and requires more work than newspapering does. The thing about these people that has made them successful is that, besides their obvious talents, they are all competitive and very hardworking.
When I was at CNN-IBN's studio early for a show one night, I was given an empty cabin to do some work. I could hear (this was around 9.30pm or so) Rajdeep come out of his cabin and give the newsroom a round of shouting for a badly used photograph and a weak headline. It struck me that these were minor things but they upset him greatly. One time, during the Gujarat elections in 2012, we began the day at 7am and finished at 11pm. Through these hours, both Rajdeep and Sagarika, did not flag and remained fresh and enthusiastic, something which some of us, me in particular, could not manage. Even during the breaks, when the cameras were switched off, Sagarika would talk of some development in the story with eyes lit up in excitement. This can only come from love for what one does.
Once on Goswami’s show on Times Now, we went into a break. I was being broadcast from home and on my earpiece could hear him ask the producers — “What’s happening on Barkha’s show?”, “What’s the subject on Rajdeep’s show? Who are the guests?” etc. Such a keen and relentless focus on work is unusual and admirable. In Pakistan, where we were for a track II conference, Barkha spent as much time outside the hall, on her phone doing work as she did inside, while the rest of us were more relaxed.
With their influence, it must be said that these people are liberal and India has benefited from them being as powerful as they are. On all social issues in India, the tone of the debate in the news is forward-looking and against prejudices. This is a great gift from Roy and his protegees to us. It could be felt by The Express Tribune readers that on the subject of Pakistan, this does not hold true, particularly of Times Now, which is often crudely nationalist in its posture, for reasons of editorial positioning. I accept that. But on India’s internal issues, these people have been a very good and very sobering influence, often producing world class content.
When former president Pervez Musharraf visited India in 2001, NDTV had Dawn’s Hameed Haroon on its panel, and the quality of programming and the coverage was outstanding.
I will miss Rajdeep and Sagarika, who along with the rest of the top Network18 team left after the Ambani takeover. I hope they start up another news station because that is their calling.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 6th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (39)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
English news channels have a 0.4 per cent viewership in India. So their importance is exaggerated.
@Mr. Khan: Modi used to leave the marriage column blank since it was a child marriage which never was consummated and he has never lved with his wife as would be expected in a traditional marriage. Once the court directed that all columns must be answered and none could be left blank - he answered the column truthfully as required. He never a big deal or touted his birginity as you seem to think he did.
People can be devout in personal life and yet believe in a secular state which does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of religion. These 2 ideas are not inconsistent with each other. So what Jysice Katju said is not inconsistent with what @Strategic Asset said.
Since you buy in everything that Justice Katju says, I take it that you also support implementation of the Uniform Civil Code in Indoa. This is something he strongly advocates and is on BJP's manifesto but opposed by those parties that self certify themselves as secular. Basically what UCC means is that no ne can have separate personal laws (marriage, divorce, inheritance) depending on their religion as is the case today.
@Strategic Asset: Utter nonsense. Your own Justice Markandey Katju states that 90% of Indians are 'idiots' because of they'll believe anything with religious overtones. Not to mention, despite being married Modi was elected with a claim that he is a virgin and hence a super Hindu.
P.S. You're making claims for which you have no proof of.
Just because Modi is the PM, it does not automatically mean that "saffronisation" has started. Modi has been elected on the plank of development. Most of the voters are young, impatient for results. Modi has an unenvious task in front of him: control prices, reduce deficit, show economic growh. Previous congress govt screwed up big time and left a mess, much like what Republican president did to Barack Obama. I learnt the other day that Obama's popularity is at the lowest today. I hope Modi does not end up like him.
@goldconsumer: if by saffronisation, you mean support for BJP has grown, surely tha is correct. However if you think that means support for a theocratic state has grown, there is no basis for that. BJP has never supported a theorcratic country and certainly there is no evidence in their manifesto that they would want that. If anything, by supporting the uniform civil code, they support equality before law not just in criminal and covil matters ( as it exists now) but also where personal law is conerned.
@Saad: Criticizing Sagarika and Rajdep means tha people are ot secular? That is a rather strange conclusion to draw?
@Bablu: Who is victimising Sagarika and Sardesai- the commentators? How is that possible to do so by writing a comment? There is a difference between selective reporting to Support one's political leanings and outright lies. In any case, when they have a right to express their opinions and pass them as facts on a medium like TV, why do you think Indian commentators have no rights to at least pass their opinion on these people and why would you describe it as saffronisation?
Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish
I am amazed to see such a one-sided position taken by our Indian friends in comments.
Many of the points that are raised against Rajdeep and Barkha may have been partly true, but it seems the commentators are crossing the line.
Many leading world journalists have clear political leanings but this does not mean that they are victimize just because of that.
All the myth of Secular India is blown up in an moment once you come to comments section of ET. It seems that only right wing hindutva now exist there and left/liberal has been silenced. Pakistan having smaller liberal population are more vocal in their thoughts than their much larger indian counterparts.
@Talha Rizvi: I dont think they are paid for that matter. India is getting saffronized, the same way we swung our pendulum to the left in the 80's and 90's.. Let them have fun. We have our own problems here in Pakistan.
@Talha Rizvi You don't have the faintest clue on what secularism means in India !! It is not the same what it means in Pakistan.
Looks like you are the mindless Troll. In case you haven't noticed the article is written by an Indian about Indian media. You should write to the ET editors and owners why they are doing this.
@Talha Rizvi: By the way why seethe at the term Internet Hindus when this website is overrun with them,
Sagarika meant it a derogatory term against all those who opposed her rants on the Internet to show that people oppose her not out of common sense but because of some underlying ideology, hence the reason why we seethe.
Anyway did you really think that all Indians on ET are Hindus? There are plenty of Indian Muslims, Christians and atheists too on ET since you asked. Otherwise we Indians don't bother about religion.
@Talha Rizvi: They dislike 'em or rather dislike what they stood for. They were quite liberal in pursuing their dishonesty and personal vendetta. Hard to see any cultured/civilized/decent individual support such behavior any where.
@Aseem: Atleast Arnab is honest.When Barkha speaks it appears as though she is speaking for effect, not honestly to convey any message.
@PiS: That's not true. Mysterious are the ways of the Mods here or else you would have known what opinion some have of Arnab the hyperventilating hysteric.
Good riddance blatantly leftist gang as for good content in Indian TV channels well it is a joke trash content is the more appropriate word here Indian TV channels should learn what is good educative new content
@PiS: Barring one person, no one said they were a fan of Arnab. But most are disgusted by the lies and misrepresentation of people like Sagarika. There is nothing liberal about presenting an old ideo as live coverage. There is nothing liberal about faking a tweet by Sushma Swaraj ( not changing it or representing it out of context - just making it up) as NDTV did. Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty. These two believed guilty even though proven innocent because we say so. Sagarika even argued with Ram Jethmalani about why he was defending a particular person when everyone knew he was guilty ( no it isn't Modi I am referring to) and Ram Jethmalani said - please learn about due process of law and the fact that everyone is entitled to a day in the court. Sorry there is nothing liberal about this dup which operated on an agenda.
Yes,there may not be many leftists from India visiting this newspaper but then there are not many leftists left in India per se.
@ModiFied: @Np: @Sure?: @BlackJack: @James: @Abhi: @Alann: @Strategic Asset: @Dipak: Amazing to see these Indian trolls who preach secularism to us bashing their own liberals Just shows that they are mostly right-wing Paid trolls with sick agendas. By the way why seethe at the term Internet Hindus when this website is overrun with them,. @ Pakistaniyonkimaakaa: Just like ansar abbasi is Good for India.
Joint earnings of the couple may well have been over a million dollars per annum & stakes are high for all. With Mukesh Ambani coughing up 4000 Crores to the original promoter Bahl & others (may be Sardesai & Ghosh too owned stock) large scale change in the set up was bound to take place. Happens all the time. Not everybody is Ramnath Goenka & the Ambanis are not proven lovers of freedom of press. Also, they might have wanted to settle a score or two after the channel gave importance to Ambani-baiter Kejariwal. Ambani naturally wants to keep Modi happy & get good return on investments made on BJP. He would want his channel to stand by him against any wannabe Kejariwal. So is Adani wanting to protect his investments & who too is involved with CNBC-18. (It was awkward to watch the channel using the nation's PM for endorsing Gujarati CNBC-Bazaar by clever surrogate advertising.) Thapar was the first thorn to be got rid off. Rest were a matter of timing & that's chosen well.It would have been inconvenient if Sardesai were to say anything against the upcoming Budget. Arun Purie of India Today is likely to accommodate the Sardesais just as he has welcomed Karan Thapar & Shekhar Gupta.
I hardly watch television news as I prefer reading it over the net as I get multiple perspective. I do agree with Aakar that people he has mentioned have taken a liberal and progressive stance over most internal issues. Part of the unravelling of corruption has been caused by these group of journalists.
@James: NDTV & CNN IBN neutral? Not by any stretch of the imagination.
Indians who comment on ET seem to be big fan of Arnab Goswami, so that says alot. I wonder if liberal and left leaning Indians ever check out this newspaper? I highly doubt that.
To see the depths to which Indian news channels plumb, one only need watch their compatriots from the financial media in India.
There is so much happening in the financial markets in India on any given day, but all of the news is presented with equanimity. Numerous financial analysts from banks, mutual funds and other institutions give interviews without rounding all of them into a room and making them spit on each other. CEOs are interviewed and hard-hitting questions are asked, but no interviewer shouts at them. In-depth behind-the-scenes reports are shown in the financial media which do not even exist in the news media. There is no Indian 60 Minutes or anything similar which does investigative journalism or looks at stories in depth.
The strangest part of it all is that these are the sister channels of the very same channels that show news 24X7. For a mellow and well presented CNBC-TV18, we have a train wreck called CNN-IBN18 with Rajdeep Sardesai shouting hoarse at the top of his lungs. But no one takes the cake as much as the Bill O'Reilly of Indian television, the nation in "The Nation Wants An Answer", Arnab Goswami.
I'm glad Sagarika Ghosh & her husband have been kicked out of Network18. From what I've heard, they are now joining IndiaTV which no one watches. Besides producing 'sensational' breaking news with full of falsified facts (especially & mostly about Modi since his CM days), Sagarika Ghosh once even tried to show the Art of Living fellow, Sri Sri Ravishankar, in a bad light by broadcasting one of his old recorded videos in a 'live debate' and making it look as if he was present there via telecommuting at the time of the 'live' coverage! Sagarika Ghosh follows that type of 'secularism' which is pretty similar to that of Congress(INC). 'Muslim Appeasement' is their main agenda while denouncing Hindus, if anything ever goes wrong (even if it was started by some Muslim(s)). Sagarika's typical questions would be like "Since Modi has now started a train service in Kashmir with a direct connectivity to Vaishnodevi for the benefit of the Hindu pilgrims, shouldn't he now see to it that a flight service is started to Mecca for the Muslims on a daily basis too?" - That for her is what 'secularism' is all about!
They are not as influential as they are made by mainly insiders.
If they had any influence Congress would not have lost the election.
These two were far better than Blah Blah Goswami and I for one will be sorry to see them go.I consider NDTV and CNN IBN to be neutral unlike Times Now.Times Now is a masala channel with their news being on "who said what".Their debates are a shouting match with all participants and Blah Blah Goswami speaking at the same time. Times Now is blatantly biased towards the BJP. This was more prominent during the election.Anything anti-Congress will be repeated for days together.Contrast the interview with Rahul Gandhi and Modi.Rahul was even asked about his educational qualifications,but in the Modi interview hard questions were ignored.I would have respected Modi more if he was interviewed by Karan Thapar,instead of all the paid interviews by various channels..The latest hype about the BJP is titled "Super Budget" by Times Now.Well let the Budget come out and we will see if its Super or not
Well wonder why the credibility of Indian TV journalism has been at a low for some time as well as the TRP of all these channels.How come no outrage on social media or other sections of media on their quitting.
Manufactured, exaggerated impressions and beliefs. No letting go. The show continues!
Rajdeep and Sagarika are like an item song. If it's in, people would see it but if it's not there, nobody really cares. Aakar Patel should stop confusing the claps and vigils an item song attracts as 'standards'.
What does it tell you about the credibility of Rajdeep, Sagrika, Karan Thapar, Barkha Dutt that for a whole decade they went after one man, lied about him, tried to depict him falsely as a monster and yet the people embraced him and gave him such a strong mandate? What it shows is that these people have NO credibility.
The source of these people's huge pay packages was their personal loyalty to a dynasty.
Good riddance to bad rubbish. They will surely not be missed.
Agree with almost everything the columnist says, except for that it about "world class content." That's utter nonsense. He has not seen the world and has no idea of standards elsewhere. The truth is Indian television journalism is fairly mediocre, and Pakistan's, even more so.
Glad to see Sardesai leave. Less leftists in TV business is better. CNN in India was worst news channel. With Ambanis things will improve.
"My friends Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose have quit their jobs in Network18. "
Surely they must have been kicked out by Ambanis. To be honest, they deserved. Both were highly biased. I am sure their past misdeeds with regard to Modi also played role in getting them removed. No tears for these two pseudo seculars. Good riddance.
A lot of people will be glad to see the back of this couple who made hay while the sun shone with their deliberate lies and deceit. Their prejudice is now past the sell-by date.
I for one shall not miss Rajdeep or Sagarika.
The fact is that Indian electronic media has no credibility. Not many Indians watch their news through these as can be gathered by the fact that until last year most of the publicly-listed holding companies for these news channels were running in the red. Because of the elections and the Bharat Nirman ads, many of these companies were able to churn out profits this year.
Before the elections, just a cursory watch was enough to find out how biased a news channel is. Even now, they are manufacturing controversies where none exist. Most of these channels are centered in New Delhi and seem to believe that India comprises of just one city.
Perhaps the Ambani can be equated with the Koch brothers of US. Ultra conservatives.
Sardesai and Barkha are pro-left trash of Indian television. I am glad to see Sardesai gone. On the other hand Arnab Goswami is a gem who would to a lots of good to India.