Another bellicose neighbour

Terrorists based in Pakistan cannot be allowed to cross borders and hurt the interests of our neighbours.


Muhammad Ali Ehsan April 05, 2014
The writer is a retired Lieutenant Colonel of the Pakistan Army and is currently pursuing PhD in civil-military relations from Karachi University

This hasn’t happened before. Iran threatening us with cross-border raids by its elite force to recover its abducted guards. Syed Hossein Naqvi Hosseini, rapporteur of Iran’s parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, has said, “Iran is prepared to act independently to crush Jaishul Adl if the Pakistan government is incapable of doing so.” Iran suspects that the guard’s abductors have taken them to bases of Jaishul Adl in Pakistan. One of the abducted guards has since then been killed. These Iranian guards were abducted on February 6 in the Jakigour region of Sistan-Balochistan province of Iran in what was not the first incident of its kind.

As if the two neighbours, India and Afghanistan, were not belligerent enough, the Iranians also seems to have joined the not too unfamiliar Pakistan-bashing chorus which claims that Pakistan is not doing enough and should do more to prevent the spillover of terrorism across its borders and into the neighbouring countries. The reason is the proliferation of transnational criminal and terrorist activities along the Pakistani borders. No nation is able to secure itself and remain sovereign unless it secures its borders. We know that since long, the level of border enforcement in Pakistan is inadequate. But what should we do to ensure that the activities of non-state actors are limited and restrained?

At the heart of the problem lies the ineptness and total apathy with which the successive military and civilian governments of Pakistan deflected and shelved the most significant issue — the issue of border enforcement. There is no research to quantify how much funds were allocated for border enforcement in the last decade or so. If sufficient funds were allocated, then they clearly have made no meaningful difference in restricting the flow of cross-border terrorism or in the movement of illegal immigrants to and from India, Afghanistan or Iran.

Can we afford to put more boots on ground on the borders? Border fencing, border patrolling and border surveillance are a combination of methods to secure the physical borders of the country. There are always remote and clandestine crossings in the border region. If the non-state actors are so familiar with them, why are our security forces unaware and ignorant about them? We claim to have mastered the ‘surveillance drone technology’ — why is it not being put to use in the border regions? These are all short-term measures. In the long run, we actually need to take the vital decision of which war we want to be ready and prepared to fight.

Terrorism and how to counter it should have been the core driver of our national security strategy and ‘border enforcement’ should have been its one very vital component. Instead, continued defence expenditures on the maintenance and battle worthiness of our conventional war fighting machines are taking a heavy economic toll.

It’s not only Iran that thinks that we have enough intelligence gathering tools, technological edge and combat experience to limit, restrict, restrain and eventually defeat terrorist organisations. Many independent analysts are also of the same opinion and have been questioning the misdirected funds and resources.

Should we, at this stage, be leaning on the shoulders of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries or should we be focusing on balancing and stabilising relations with our neighbours? I think this is a core question, answering which will imply the direction our political, military and foreign policies should take. We must jointly protect each other’s interests. Terrorists based in Pakistan cannot be allowed to cross borders and hurt the interests of our neighbours.

The Iranian outcry is genuine. If the issue is not handled properly it has the potential to create serious misgivings between the two neighbours. Iran is a valued neighbour and a brotherly Islamic country. More than assurances, we need to formulate a ‘joint border security and enforcement policy’. Frontier Corps mans our border posts but if terrorism has to be controlled, our regular forces, sooner than later will have to become a stakeholder in ensuring security along are western border with Afghanistan as well as Iran.

It’s time we seriously viewed the ‘hypocritical gaps’ in what is happening on ground in Pakistan and what our state’s stated position is.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 6th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (8)

Lt Col Imtiaz Alam (retd) | 10 years ago | Reply

Crying wolf. The caption "Bellicose Neighbor" is apt for Iran. With Khomeini's return & Iran on the road to becoming a Nuclear Power( A gift from Pakistan ) it has started to show its muscle to the Arab World & Pakistan. A sense of Insecurity regarding its Ideology.It has no bone of contention with India & Afghanistan minus Mullah Umar.

F | 10 years ago | Reply

You think it is another "bashing chorus". That is the heart of the matter. You don't think there is a problem. As people in Pakistan and outside have repeatedly pointed out, these "assets" are created, nurtured, supported and then exported to neighboring countries - all from the heartlands of Pakistan. Civilians and the military have crafted a national narrative that gives these "assets" wide support amongst the masses and protection from the law. Together they have crafted policies in the "national interest".

If you don't eliminate the problem - if you think it is one, at the source, you can't control the borders. No military has succeeded in doing that.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ