Sharfuddin Abu Tawwamah (RA) and Hazrat Shah Ali Bagdadi (RA) are a couple of other strongly entrenched symbols of Sufism in Bangladesh.
But what one perceives and hears while being in Dhaka hardly reflects the Sufi tradition. In fact, the conduct of certain segments of the politically polarised society in Bangladesh essentially seems to run counter to the Sufi principles of compassion, peace, forgiveness and selflessness. On the face of it, the green colour — symbolic of Islam and the Sufi tradition — remains very much alive in Bangladesh.
Hasina Wajid, the prime minister, told a gathering of scholars in Dhaka on March 24 that “the government would stick to the Meesaq-e-Madina (The Madina Charter)”.
The Awami League, it seems is determined to keep using 1971 as the political staple for its followers. The knee-jerk reaction to the support of the Pakistani cricket team by some Bangladeshi fans, i.e, the ban on the waving of foreign flags clearly denied the spirit of Sufi teachings. Though the ban was withdrawn a day later, it exposed the deep-seated inherent dislike, if not hatred, of anything associated with Pakistan, particularly among the Awami League members, activists as well as those sympathetic to the party in the business and bureaucracy.
Just recall what the Awami League leadership allowed on December 22, 2013, when Ganajagaran Mancha activists practically marched on the Pakistan High Commission in Dhaka, almost besieging it, as the police found themselves constrained by political orders of ‘not being too hard on protestors.’ The protest had been organised in response to a seemingly unnecessary resolution that Pakistan’s National Assembly had passed condemning the Jamaat-e-Islami Assistant Secretary General Abdul Quader Molla’s execution order, following his conviction by a Dhaka court for crimes against humanity, including the charge of collaborating with Pakistani forces to kill 369 others in 1971 during Bangladesh’s war of independence.
Ganajagaran Mancha’s demand of the maximum punishment for all 1971 war criminals itself denies the spirit of Sufism and exemplifies those wanting revenge at all costs. The ostensible patronage of the ruling party for this movement and the conscious attempt to keep alive the “terrible echoes of 1971” through the war crime trials also contradicts the spirit of the April 9, 1974 Indo-Pakistan-Bangladesh Delhi Agreement.
Article 14 of the agreement, for instance, says that the prime minister of Bangladesh had declared, with regard to the atrocities and destruction committed in Bangladesh in 1971, that he wanted the people to forget the past and to make a fresh start, stating that the people of Bangladesh knew how to forgive. This agreement amounted to “burying the hatchet” and was supposed to have been a forward-looking step but the anti-Pakistan acrimony that keeps resonating in the Bangladeshi print and electronic media even today is quite shocking and bespeaks volumes about how sections of the Bengali political elites remain frozen in history, refusing to even heed the Father of Nation’s commitment in the 1974 Delhi Agreement. This fixation with 1971 only underscores an attempt to stoke anti-Pakistan sentiment and thus gain political mileage.
One must, however, caution that — based on conversations in the Gulf and Europe with Bengali political and intellectual elites — it is quite obvious that the other side of the political divide, led by former prime minister Khaleda Zia, remains compassionate and inclined towards moving on as far as Pakistan is concerned. Unfortunately, though, Begum Zia remains on the fringe, at least for the time being.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 2nd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (34)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@imtiaz:
If you are indeed the author of this article, you did not get the gist of my comments. I am not being "parochial". I just pointed out that when such horrendous and brutal genocide is committed, the onus is on the nation (and by extension, its citizen) that committed the atrocities to make amends, assuming they are sincere in reconciliation, and not victims. I am sure you and a few other compassionate Pakistanis are truly sorry about the 1971 BD atrocities, but that is not enough.
Do not worry for BanglaDesh.Bangladesh is on the right track.
Imtiaz - please re-read what you have written: ... Most Pakistanis feel extremely bad about what happened to the Muslims in Bengal. ... Dont be parochial please, thanks
One definition of Parochial: very limited or narrow in scope or outlook;
Shouldn't your statement read Most Pakistanis feel extremely bad about what happended to the Bengalis (including the hated Hindus) in Bengal.
Parochial someone?
Me thinks a correction is required unless of course according to the author most Pakistanis are game about massacring the - let me be correct - non-Muslims. Thanks
Mr.Observer - whoever you are - problems in Pakistan doesn't mean we stop talking of similar things elsewhere. Younger generations don't have to necessarily pay with blood. Most Pakistanis feel extremely bad about what happened to the Muslims in Bengal. They are equally pained to see what their civilian and military ruling has been doing to them but people at large even in developed democracies are usually helpless. Pakistanis themselves reeling from excessive ruling elites and don't deserve what they are getting. But that doesn't mean I stop writing down my observations when I visit some new place.Dont be parochial please, thanks
@G. Din:
Very correct observations and well-stated. I totally agree.
@deep:
"why should young pakistanis have to pay for the crimes of yahya khan, niazi, Rao firman ali and the 200 odd pakistani soldiers who were accused of war crimes? Imagine the entire german nation having to answer for the madness of hitler and his coterie even today. "
First, the present day Germans do accept the legacy of Hitler and have taken the responsibility to address Nazi atrocities and taken steps to make sure it never happens again. They don't deny the genocide committed by Hitler and the Nazis.
Today's young Pakistanis are not accountable for what happened in 1971, but they are, sure as heck are the inheritors of the history and legacy of that dark period. As such, they are responsible to seek forgiveness and pay reparations to the nation of BD. You just can't brush away historical responsibilities.
@Mohammad Saleem: fine! If you don't like real history, just recreate the facts to your liking. :-). You must be leading a wonderful life with that skill since reality is not a concern for you because you have the skill to recreate it to your liking. Amazing talent!
@Huma: As a first step, the govt should declassify the Hamudur Rehman commission report.
The report was declassified by Pakistan in 2000 soon after the Indian press leaked it. Please read the subsequent article by a famed Pakistani commentator, the late Ardeshir Cowasjee, who quotes verbatim from the report.
It is important to bring closure to the events of 1971 and this can only be done by constituting an impartial international commission
While unbeknownst to you, the facts of 1970-71 are well established. Bangladeshis know the truth well because they bore the brunt of it. You are clutching at straws where none exist.
The war crimes court that the awami league is using to settle grievances is widely believed to be flawed by the rest of the world
No one cares about it. HRW has criticized the process and speed of the trials a couple of times, but the flip-side of this is that the religious right-wing organizations in Bangladesh have through their actions abetted this speedy trial.
Is this not just nice, that they and we leave each other alone. There was no positive or any engagement with Bangladesh on any issue in past 6 years, so downgrade our diplomatic presentation to save some much needed money, and may be try to look more interested in the neighborhood, instead of mutual hate exchange to an independent country a thousand mile away, with no real dispute.
I just don't get it. Why do Pakistanis feel that Bangladeshi's should love them? If a few Bangladeshi's support Pakistan, that is a Muslim thing and nothing else. So don't make too much out of it.
That country is on the right path, and one day the gap between the two will be like the one between India and Pakistan.
Thank God Bangladesh borders India, not Pakistan.
Does Pakistan have any business in passing a resolution in its Assembly about a matter that does not concern it and is an internal affair of Bangladesh. Poking nose in others affairs at times can be very smelly if not stinky business. Hope a few lessons are learned so dirty linen is not exposed to the public.
A dishonest article. Thankfully Pakistan does not have a contiguous border with bangladesh and thus cramping its establishment's penchant for mischief. While the AL is definitely wrong in creating this 1971 bogey among people, the author should criticize Pakistan's stand vis-a-vis the execution of the butcher of Mirpur.
Since pakistan has not moved on, this friction between bangladesh and pakistan will only get worse. The tragedy today is young pakistanis write articles about a sense of hurt vis-a-vis bangladesh's flag policies - why should young pakistanis have to pay for the crimes of yahya khan, niazi, Rao firman ali and the 200 odd pakistani soldiers who were accused of war crimes? Imagine the entire german nation having to answer for the madness of hitler and his coterie even today.
What people fail to understand is that great atrocities were committed on the Bengali nationals in the name of Islamic solidarity.Finally they won and we lost but at great cost to both parties.India played the role of friend in need. Are we to now insist in the name of Islamic solidarity, will such an appeal be of any use? What will they teach to their children in school regarding the war of Independence for Bengla Dash?. Who are we to insist on such issues. Besides where is the Islamic empire we dream of and where is such brother hood.
Both sides suffered a lot why do we always forget? No apologies are required we did what was right for our nation and they did what they thought was right. We are now different nations.What do we want from them.? We should treat them as such and respond in the same way. Let time and necessity heal the wounds. Not sweet and misguided lectures. The world is full of Muslims let BD decide what and where to go.. As far as we are concerned there are a lot of problems faced by this country lets solve them and become a prosperous society.
The author has missed out an important factor in this discussion. The role of planner, motivator and finance provider of this insane sentiment in Bangladesh, and no prizes for guessing the name.
@Mohammad Saleem: Mr.Saleem , please read your history a little more carefully . Not one , I repeat not ,one Muslim League leader or a leader of Hindu Right wing RSS went to British Jail for even one day . Both Muslim League and RSS were the strategic assets used by the British in furtherance of their policy of divide and rule in India . It was the Congress which faced severe oppression in their fight for independence . The entire Congress leadership starting with Gandhi , Nehru , Sadar Patel , Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Khan Abdul Gafar Khan ,Subhash Bose and tens of thousand others that spend decades in British jail .
through the war crime trials also contradicts the spirit of the April 9, 1974 Indo-Pakistan-Bangladesh Delhi Agreement.
Bangladesh never signed the above agreement, it was only between India and Pakistan.
Sufism is more closer to Hinduism than the original Islam. With its mysticism, with its emphasis on tombs(idols), with personalities, with particular places of reverence, with its emphasis on music.
Since, it has a Muslim stamp, it is good. Everyone starts calling a Car, a Bus, it'll eventually be known as a Bus(improvisation to pass the censors).
Bangladesh is lucky to get out of the clutches of the Two Nation Theory. As we have seen in Egypt and Turkey and other Muslim majority nations, a Secular dictatorship is better than a Islamist Democracy.
Pakistan itself has not been able to move beyond 1947 and the author wants Bangladesh to move beyond 1971 .
Let me endorse Imtiaz Gul's sentiment about Pakistan-bashng, now on in Banglades since Awami League came to power there, since past six years, by giving a recent xample of what happened in Dhaka last Sunday when Pakistan was playingits T20 match against Team BD. . My son-in-law received a phone cxall from Dhaka on Monday saying he was not allowed to enter the playing field because he carried a Pakistani flag to boost Team Pakistan. This happened after Bangladesh Cricket Board had withdrawn its directive about hoisting flags of different coountries during play. Obviously, the edict banning was targetted against Pakistan to encouage Pakistan-bashing. In contrast when the BD Hgh Commission celebrated its national day at a five-star hotel at Islamabad on March 26, a galaxy of Pakistani citizwens attended the reception.Thus, Pakistanis show greater compassion for the peole of Muslim Bengal who we continue to look upon as brothers and former compatriots.
I really apologise for the horrible spelling mistakes in my last post. Incompetent me.
Pakistan, as a state policy, will not extend a public apology to Bangladesh for the war crimes of 1971 ... but want Bangladesh to forgive, forget and move on ... !!?? ... they will bide their time for Khaleda Zia to come to power ... but no apology ... !!
What has Sufi spirit to do with criminals.Where is Sufi spirit off JI.For 67 years we are showing Sufi spirit as a result of that they are cutting our throats.Those who unleash mayhem must be eliminated with force.
A Pakistani talking about Sufism.....Wah
The People of Bangladesh are our Muslim brothers. The people of West and East wings of Pakistan have undergone the similar miseries and atrocities at the hands of Colonial Rulers and their favorites Hindu Leaders who at a point of time gone mad and massacred Muslims in East and West Parts of Pakistan. Time is a best healer, the Muslims of both sides will realize the historical facts and ultimately sanity will prevail. The dogmatic approach of present Government of Bangladesh is certainly a short-lived and is to be engulfed "Hold the Rope of Allah and don't be divided".