On the morning of February 27, the majority (534 to 49) of the members of the European Parliament (MEPs) voted in favour of a resolution that demanded European Union Member States not to "perpetrate unlawful targeted killings or facilitate such killings by other states” and called on them to “oppose and ban practices of extra judicial targeted killings.”
Reprieve is a non government organisation working against the death penalty.
Resolution
The resolution also stated that the "drone strikes by a State on the territory of another State without the consent of the latter constitute a violation of international law and of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of that country."
It further said that "thousands of civilians have reportedly been killed or seriously injured by drone strikes [but] these figures are difficult to estimate, owing to lack of transparency and obstacles to effective investigation."
The resolution added that “drone strike policies have been documented as causing considerable harm to the daily lives of ordinary civilians in the countries concerned, including deep anxiety and psychological trauma, disruption of economic and social activities and reduced access to education among affected communities.”
Reprieve also lodged a complaint with the International Criminal Court regarding the involvement of Nato member states in facilitating drone campaign.
Positive response
Regarding the vote by the members of the parliament Kat Craig, the Reprieve Legal Director said that, “Today’s vote represents a triumph of conscience by MEPs, who have issued a clear call to national European governments to come clean on their complicity with the CIA’s illegal drones programme, and bring it to an immediate halt."
The legal director further added that "this should be a wake-up call to countries like the UK and Germany; they need to clean up their act not only by ensuring that they stop cooperating with extrajudicial killings, but also by pressuring the US for greater transparency and accountability.”
Delighted by the vote, anti-drone activist from Pakistan and one of the victims of the drone strikes Karim Khan said that, “As I prepare to return home, I will take with me this heartening news – that Europe is listening to those who have been harmed by America’s illegal drone war. Not just innocents like my brother and son, but all those who are terrorised daily by the drones circling overhead."
Khan's brother and son were killed in a drone strike in Waziristan in 2009.
"Drone strikes are not the answer. Today, Europe has taken a first step to bringing a stop to these illegal, unaccountable killings; I hope that national governments will follow suit, so that one day I may finally get justice,” Khan stated, speaking against the aerial attacks.
MEP and chair of the Parliament's sub-committee on human rights Barbara Lochbihler said that, "The European Parliament has today raised serious concerns with the use of military drones and the deaths of thousands of civilians resulting from drone strikes. MEPs have delivered a strong rebuke to the practice of targeted aerial killings outside a declared war zone, as well as the use of armed drones in war situations outside of the international legal framework."
She also said that "the EU needs to address the legal, ethical and security challenges posed by the increasing use of drones, including the urgent need to secure complete transparency and accountability. The resolution also stresses that EU member states should strictly refrain from participating in or facilitating extrajudicial targeted killings, for instance by sharing relevant information with countries such as the US."
COMMENTS (29)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
It is morally repugnant for the president of the US to act like God, unilaterally striking down those that our questionable intelligence identifies as threats to the US, without any declaration of war by the Congress. To the extent the targeted individuals may in fact be plotting murder and mayhem in the US or elsewhere, the use of drones is still a betrayal of traditional American principles, a kind of high-tech lynching. It is only a matter of time before the same technology becomes available to others; will it seem like justice when a Drone launched from, say, Yemen, strikes within national borders of the US or our allies?
@Aschraful Makhlooq: It's just sweet words to cover the fact that Europe is moving to develop its own drones to use the same way the U.S. has. It's all there in the resolution but Europe's PR machine has suckered the Pakistani press completely.
Reality check. Not one head of state from the EU has ever made drones an issue - certainly not when meeting Obama nor when meeting with the press. Further - if asked does anyone think that any member of the EU believes that Pakistan has the right to provide sanctuary to terrorist?
Pakistani desi liberals are basically war mongers.
our elitist confused liberals love drones
We will leave it to Victoria Nuland to answer.
Moment of shame for Pak military and ruling party...
Its all about Punjab... the rest are shooders
GoP does a lot of $Condemnation$$ #RoyalLipService
Read the fine print. The resolution only condemns arbitrary strikes, strikes intended to terrorize civilians, or those not authorized by the Security Council. Although nobody will cite it explicitly, drone ops are authorized by UNSC 1373, which strips state sovereignty from uncontested terror-controlled areas and encourages member-states to take action in those areas. The EU resolution ends with a commitment by EU members to develop their own drone attack aircraft and to work out how these shall be controlled.
Euro nation are run by spineless and pompous leftist liberals without a shred of respect for for their native culture.
Those who favors drones should envisage a future in which they and their loved ones could get killed as collateral damage or because they were 'suspects'
@Stranger: Rape: The national sport of India.. Isn't it?
this is absolutely beauty of a flying machine
Drones are good and needed in the changing warfare techniques. Theitems cited including psychological and economic issues being created, are 10 times worse where terrorists are active like pakistan. The people who are against drones which has been effeective against talibans are part of the terrorists network. These people need to be marked for future drone strikes.
Taliban apologists
Now all the right wingers would jump out their seats and starts point fingers at Pakistani liberals.
@Ghalib
You summed it up in so few words. Hats off to you
Get rid of extremism and drones will stop as well. Simple.
This is a positive news and become possible thanks to people like Karim Khan, his lawyer and organization Reprieve.
European Parliament is pro taliban