Obama to seek Congress' approval for military action against Syria

US President says the US has positioned assets in the region near Syria.


Afp August 31, 2013
US President Barack Obama (L) speaks next to Vice President Joe Biden (R) at the Rose Garden of the White House August 31, 2013, in Washington. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama said Saturday he will ask the US Congress to authorise military action against Syria, lifting the threat of immediate strikes on President Bashar al-Assad's regime.

Addressing reporters in the Rose garden, Obama said he had decided he would go ahead and take military action on Syria but he believed it was important for American democracy to win the support of lawmakers.

The decision represents a significant gamble for Obama, who has an estranged relationship with lawmakers, especially Republicans, and he risks suffering the same fate as British Prime Minister David Cameron, who lost his own vote on authorising military action in parliament.

"I will seek authorisation for the use of force from the American people's representatives in Congress," Obama said.

Obama said that Congressional leaders had agreed to schedule a debate as soon as lawmakers return from their summer break.

That is not due to take place until September 9. There was no immediate suggestion that the House of Representatives and the Senate would be called back into session early.

There had been growing expectations in Washington that military action could even happen as soon as this weekend, but Obama's decision means that will now not happen.

Nevertheless, the president also said that he had decided that military force should be the price for what the United States says is the "undeniable" use of chemical weapons by Syria.

"Our military has positioned assets in the region," Obama said.

"We are prepared to strike whenever we choose."

Complete transcript of the speech can be found here.

COMMENTS (18)

Gp65 | 10 years ago | Reply @Imran: You make it appear as though seeking permission from Congress before going to war is an act of weakness. By that logic I am sure you think Musharraf was very brave to do Kargill without anyone's approval. but what Obama is doing now is true democracy. At a time when severe cuts are being placed on education and healthcare due o a fiscal crunch, any large scale commitment to a war especially at a time that US has not been attacked, can only be undertaken if US public approves as judged by the votes of their Congressmen who are polling their constituents. @Naumann : US does not have a parliament, so if for some strange reason it needed parliamentary approval, it would have no way to get it. US does have Congress though and Congressional approval is required for going o war, so it is NOT a formality. @lalagee: I agree with many of your posts but not this one. War is not a video-game. There are lives involved. What is happening in Syria is a huge human tragedy. While the chemical weapons if it occurred is horrendous, unless it is confirmed that it was indeed Assad who used them, action against him would not be justified. In any case it is for American people to decide if USA should get involved or not.
Ehsan Ullah | 10 years ago | Reply

I think we are about to witness a 3rd World War. If America attack Syria and Russia pounces over Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel are not far apart to utilize their opportunities then what do you say about India, Pakistan, UK, China and Korean states??? Once Albert Einstein said that I don't know which Weapons will be used to fight World War III but 4th world war will be fought with Stones and sticks. Advance congratulations to all those who will survive.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ