Looking at foreign relations from the perspective of economics, Islamabad should realise that resetting relations with India would be rewarding in several ways. Pakistan is the only country of a significant size that borders two giant economies — China and India. Until recently, both were growing at extraordinarily rapid rates. With a rate of growth three to four times that of the average for the old industrial nations, China had begun to catch up with them in terms of the size of its economy. In 2010, it overtook Japan and became the world’s second largest economy, after the United States. India, also because of the size of its population, was climbing on the world economic ladder. Pakistan has a great deal to gain with these two economies sitting right across its border. That said, there are a few changes occurring in India to which policymakers in the new administration need to pay some attention.
After having enjoyed a period of almost breakneck growth when the rate of increase in its GDP approached 10 per cent a year, India has seen the pace of economic expansion reduced by one-half. Growth has brought several problems to the surface, which its aging leadership does not seem to have the energy to tackle. Until the next elections, that must be held no later than the spring of 2014, the country is unlikely to move decisively to handle the many difficulties it faces, including relations with Pakistan. It is unlikely that a major change in economic relations with Pakistan will occur until India settles down politically. It is only after the 2014 elections that the Indian leadership will be inclined to develop its approach towards Pakistan. This gives Islamabad some time to develop its own policy towards its neighbour, which would help the new administration in India that will take power in 2014 to look at Pakistan in a different way.
There will also be a pause in the further development of India’s relations with the United States. How these will evolve will have consequences for Pakistan. If America was hoping to balance China’s rising power by promoting that of India, that may not happen on the time-scale Washington had set its sights on. Suddenly, India has come face to face with economic, political and social problems that were still below the surface when, in 2010, President Barack Obama famously called India “not a rising but a risen power”. That was during his second visit to Asia as the American president. He turned to India when his approach to China during his first Asian visit drew the ire of the American political right. The conservatives and ultra-nationalists were not ready to give up the notion of American exceptionalism, which was based on the strong belief that the country was created to export its social and political values to the outside world. China, on that score, had very little to share with America. On the other hand, India, the world’s largest democracy, had more in common with America. It would make a good partner.
However, the Indian policy elite does not share Washington’s enthusiasm about the role their country could play on the global stage. In the words of Manjari Chatterjee Miller in an article contributed to a recent issue of Foreign Affairs, “for the last decade, few trends have captured the world’s attention as much as the so-called rise of the rest, the spectacular economic and political emergence of powers such as China and India ... within India itself, the foreign policy elite shies away from any talk of the country’s rising status.” If this interpretation is correct, internal Indian dynamics will set it towards playing a greater role in its own neighbourhood rather than getting involved in global politics. This will naturally affect the way India will view Pakistan and Pakistan will approach India.
If Pakistan manages well this period of transitions — those taking place in India and in the United States — it will benefit a great deal. Increased trade with India will significantly add to the trade-to-GDP ratio, change the structure of the economy by basing it more on the country’s endowments, increase employment per unit of national output, and turn some of the cities on the country’s borders into centres of international commerce. Pakistan could also provide transit routes for India’s growing trade with China, the countries in Central Asia and the Middle East. All this will probably add one to two percentage points of GDP growth a year by 2025. Resetting the Indian policy, therefore, has large rewards for Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 3rd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Babloo: For the last sixty seven years you have only one problem Kashmir Kashmir Kashmir first ask Balochis if they want to live with you and then go to Hazara leave Kashmir save Pakistan.
@Babloo: The same old story that has no end and benefits none.
Pakistan should not trade with India until India gives it Kashmir. lol
hmmm. I couldnt understand one thing i.e why are our policies revolve around india?? cant we make independent and indigenous policies. What is so special with India? What will pakistan get in long run by giving transit route to India and importing ginger, tomatoes and potatoes.! For God sake leave this rhetoric. India should be dealt like a normal neighbor. We should build our economy and compete the leaders of the world. There is nothing to benchmark India except corruption.
Indo-Pak friendship will be perhaps one of the greatest events in the history of South Asia in the times to come for which the citizens of the two nations should stay prepared. The test of real patriotism now lies in ones perseverance with regard to pushing forward the wagon of Indo-Pak trust and amity with the required fuel of confidence and optimism. The citizens of India and Pakistan must now wake up from their social slumber which has lasted for almost sixty years with the violent blizzards of military conflicts and intrusions which are now a story of the past. The warmth of trust and amity alone can melt this political snow and end this diplomatic winter between India and Pakistan. As regards economic relationship between the two neighbours this is one such area that should now be pushed forward from both sides and the apprehension that India shall not move forward decisively in this regard till the next general elections to the Lok Sabha are concluded may not be a perception that is very agreeable. Pakistan has to work on an economic policy with regard to their relationship with India and act fast on granting the 'Most Favoured Nations' status (MFN) just as India has granted the same to Pakistan. No doubt the present Indian Government has many other issues internal and external to handle and with the next general elections to Lok Sabha now round the corner a more cautious approach is quite natural. This does not mean that a mover forward by Pakistan towards improving bilateral relationship shall not be welcomed infact an equally reciprocal response from India will be the outcome. India as a market is big enough to consume a major share of goods and products manufactured in Pakistan hence offers the desired market potential that Pakistan needs. Indo-Pak relations have changed with the people on either sides having begun to realise the detriment caused due to antipathy and distrust hence, there is a desire, a willingness on both sides to come forward with amity and trust. Indo-Pak friendship is now becoming a reality that till almost a decade behind was seen as pipe dream. Thus one can see the beginning of a new political renaissance.
@nrmr44: With all the claims of all weather friendship and stronger than steel claims with China why has Pakistan.trade with China has not blossomed.Frankly how many countries have prospered in their trade with China Not many.On th other hand all of them are importing cheap Chinese made stuff and increasing their debt.China maybe the second largest economy,but it has not helped Pakistan either and in real terms Pakistan is looking for hard currency by trying to export to US.Europe,gulf nations and others.so trade outside the Chinese strangle hold is what Pakistan should be looking at.
Children of migrants only dreaming of busniss with old mother bhoomi land we native of Pakistan don't even know we can do busnisses with south America, north Africa, central asia and mid east and its not possible marriage after divorce in islam ....
If Pakistan needs economic partnership to get its nostrils above the waterline why has it not succeeded with China? Or with America before that? Why would India be more forthcoming? For a person who has been a Finance Minister, the author has a very poor perspective on the recent fall in India's GDP growth rate. The roots are not India-specific but global. India's fall from 9% to 5% is matched by China's from 12% to 7%, and some major European economies that have even contracted. In any case, if India's problems were India-specific trade with Pakistan would hardly figure in any solution. No my good caretaker Finance Minister and VP World Bank, there are no back doors to India's economy that you can sneak through. Pakistan is not going to gain any leverage between now and the Indian elections in 2014, and no Indian administration, now or later, is likely to look at Pakistan any differently than now. When Pakistan performs under its own steam it won't have to reach out to others. Others will come to it. But for that it will need professional advice and not grand hallucinations.
Nations must conduct their Foreign Relations keeping the welfare of citizens in mind. What will benefit them and make their lives better should be the primary focus.
Trade? Good point but first of all demolish your so called "Strategic Assets".
"This will naturally affect the way India will view Pakistan and Pakistan will approach India. " +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ India views Pakistan as a state sponsor of Terror. Thats based on ground reality rest is smoke screen.
For about six decades, Pakistan’s approach to the outside world was determined by Kashmir ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ It continues to be the same.
Too many simplistic assumptions by author. First of all, Pakistan or for that matter any foreign policy are not an issue in any Indian election. Indian foreign policy remains almost same irrespective of the party in power. Almost all political parties will like to have normal peaceful relations with Pakistan. However, no political party or for that matter any India will trust Pakistan on the face value as Pakistan is well known for going back on most of the agreements. Ball has always been in Pakistan's court. She has to decide what she wants; peaceful relations or hateful.
gp65 Ji : . The dreams of Trade to CARs using Pakistan for Transit and Gwadar for “Port” Facilities seems to be deeply etched in the Pakistani psyche. . If Mr. Shahid Javed Burki were to check the trade figures of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan he will find that these Five countries carry out possibly 60-75% - possibly more - of their trade with Europe and China by using the Railways for Transportation. . Regarding the Pipelines for Oil and Natural Gas through Pakistan for China – actually Xinjiang – is a non-starter as Xinjiang exports Huge amounts of Oil and Natural Gas to China. . The cost of Pipelines from Pakistan to the Eastern-Southern Seaboard of china would be astronomical and as such China has constructed a New Port, about 50-100 Miles south of Akyab- Sitwe, Kyaukpyu Deep-Sea Port. The Oil and Natural Gas Pipe Lines were to be inaugurated in May-June to Transport the Oil and Natural Gas to Kunming. . Cheers
These are the profound views of an economist & intellectual.But, do our politicians understand the dynamics of what Mr.Burki has said & anticipated vis-a-vis regional & International politico-economic emerging realities in coming couple of years.If they do understand,which i doubt,things will move in the right direction in improving the economy or else, as one suggested earlier, the GOP should form a group of Economists of Pakistan to collectively ponder over the grave economic situation as it exists & contribute some Valuable & Workable solutions to GOP for today & beyond.
This govt can do nothing.............Congress is gone
Okay, now you say Pakistan should trade with India because it would be good for Pakistan. That's then bad news for India. Why should India trade with a country whose economy supports anti-india extrimists and is primarily organized on the principle of hate of india and non-muslims ?
"akistan could also provide transit routes for India’s growing trade with China,"
Huh? India shares a border wit China? Why would it transit goods to China via Pakistan?