After vowing transparency, US mum on drone killing

United States refuses to confirm that it killed the number two in the TTP, Waliur Rehman.


Web Desk/afp May 29, 2013
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney speaks to reporters in the briefing room of the White House in Washington May 29, 2013. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: The United States on Wednesday refused to confirm that it killed the number two in the Pakistani Taliban, despite President Barack Obama's promise of more transparency on the drone war.

The killing of Waliur Rehman, deputy leader of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) was the first known US drone strike since Obama's speech last week laying out new criteria for the covert use of unmanned aerial vehicles.

His death was the first test of whether US authorities would provide more transparency on drone operations by the CIA or the military after Obama's pledge of greater accountability over the use of such attacks.

"We are not in a position to confirm the reports of Waliur Rehman's death," White House spokesperson Jay Carney said, following an attack in which the TTP number two and at least five others were killed.

"If those reports were true, or prove to be true, it's worth noting that his demise would deprive the TTP of its second-in-command and chief military strategist." Carney said.

Carney said Rehman was also wanted in connection with attacks on US and Nato personnel in Afghanistan and for involvement in the attack on American citizens in Khost, Afghanistan on December 30, 2009.

That strike, though Carney did not describe it in detail, was a dark day in CIA history, when seven counter-terrorism agents and security contractors were killed in a suicide bombing in a remote outpost.

Carney would not confirm whether the attack on Rehman satisfied the new criteria for drone strikes established by Obama last week during a speech that aimed to recast the country's decade-long battle against terrorism.

In the speech, Obama said that lethal force would only be used to "prevent or stop attacks against US persons," when capture is not feasible and if a target poses a "continuing, imminent threat" to Americans.

But Carney pointed out a clause in Obama's speech in which he said that in the "Afghan war theater" Washington must support its troops until the Nato withdrawal is complete in 2014.

The president said that strikes would continue against "high value al Qaeda targets, but also against forces that are massing to support attacks on coalition forces."

A CIA spokesperson also declined to confirm Rehman's death.

Security, tribal and intelligence officials told AFP in Pakistan that Rehman, who had a $5 million US government bounty on his head, was the target of the strike in North Waziristan and was killed.

Pakistani government condemns drone strike

The Pakistani government "expressed serious concerns" over the US drone strike that killed Waliur Rehman on Wednesday, according to a press release from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Pakistan has maintained its stance that US drone strikes are counter-productive, result in the loss of innocent lives and violate Pakistani sovereignty.

COMMENTS (10)

Pratt | 10 years ago | Reply

@numbersnumbers: Re: OBL, so his wives were there. How does that prove that OBL himself was there? Haven't you seen the thousand contradictions in the story the Americans have given of how that operation progressed? So that's right, you have NO EVIDENCE that OBL was there. Re: knowing the identities, with that argument you are justifying the unjustifiable. The Americans consistently claim that the drones pick off targets after pinpointing them specifically as threats to American security, this has no comparison with a regular operation involving live soldiers. You obviously haven't read the massive coverage of the issue that the US has NO idea who it is killing with its drones. Dear Express Tribune, please do post this response of mine, it is my humble request to you.

Mal | 10 years ago | Reply

@numbersnumbers: How do you claim to know what OBL's wives said? No report has ever been released to the public by either Pakistan or the US about what they have said. The commission investigating this incident could not produce a genuine report because no American showed up to be interviewed by it. The actual fact was supposed to come from the Americans and they have provided none. They claim to have taken away large numbers of documents from the compound but no evidence came out of there either. Moreover, not only Hillary Clinton but also the commanding officer of the SEALs has said there is "absolutely no evidence" Pakistan knew OBL was there. The SEALs that took part in that operation have been getting killed off in mysterious freak accidents and the US constantly changed its story of how the operation was carried out.

In spite of all that you are capable of believing without any evidence that OBL was there.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ