Deweaponisation — our only option

Published: January 2, 2013

The writer is a health, safety and environment consultant

“Violence — and the threat of it — is a pre-political manner of communication and control, characteristic of undemocratic organisations and hierarchical relationships. For the ancient Athenians who practiced an incipient, albeit limited form of democracy, violence was characteristic of the master-slave relationship, not that of free citizens”. — Firmin DeBrabander, Professor of philosophy at the Maryland Institute College, Baltimore

While the polio vaccine may prevent future crippling disabilities, the more urgent problem for Pakistan is to manage its already deranged section of society. In a span of 24 hours, six female health workers were shot dead by second-century zealots armed with 21st-century weapons. A massive proliferation of firearms has reduced Pakistan to a society where the pressing of triggers has replaced logic and dialogue as the preferred mode of conflict-resolution. The government stands dysfunctional and helpless — its role limited to announcing compensations for the victims, almost like a sordid incentive for an untimely death.

Freedom and the right to life, liberty and speech are often the first victims in an armed society. Girls in Swat erased Malala’s name from their school walls, not because they respected her any less, but because they did not wish to be killed by the fanatics. Pakistan has chosen to be a violent society where private militias patronised by political parties, religious fanatics and criminal gangs actually call the shots. The control of towns and cities seems to be with the groups that own the most weapons.

The word ‘gun control’ is not part of our vocabulary. No one really knows how many licences were issued or to whom. Each time, the figures are different and there is a footnote of missing records. The Supreme Court in its suo-motu case 16/2011 concluded that the federal government had issued 46,114 licences of prohibited bore and 1,202,470 licences of non-prohibited bore during the past five years. Not to be left behind, the Sindh government admitted to having issued another 400,000 gun licences. The Sindh minister for food declared that his assets include an armoury of weapons costing Rs7.5 million and an expense of Rs2.5 million for the bullets consumed.

Weapons are also a key component of the class struggle in Pakistan. The rich and the powerful wish to have an exclusive ‘right to kill’. While Article 9 of the Constitution provides the right to life and liberty to every citizen, it is defeated by the hugely discretionary Arms Ordinance 1965. Using this law, the powerful and influential receive hundreds of licenses for prohibited and non-prohibited bore weapons. Their abhorrence for any form of arms control is thus well understood. This forces the lesser citizens to resort to unlicensed weapons, which are easily and freely available.

No peace is possible in Karachi or elsewhere if we continue to advance our reasoning through the barrel of a gun. While peaceful political solutions are pursued, it is inconceivable that peace can be sought without eliminating the primary tool that is used to manufacture violence. No citizen, regardless of his rank or status, rich or poor must be allowed to possess, carry or display any weapon of any bore — licensed or otherwise. Providing security is the responsibility of the state and it must not be sublet to private armies.

The reforms for peace must begin by repealing the discriminatory and discretionary Arms Ordinance. No one should henceforth have the authority to issue any licence to anyone. The already issued licences for all kinds of weapons must be cancelled. A ‘Deweaponisation Commission’ should be established to create and implement a phase-wise deweaponisation strategy to take back all weapons from every citizen of Pakistan. Weapon smuggling, transporting and selling must be eradicated. The private weapon manufacturing factories can be regulated and placed under strict government controls. Their stocks can be purchased by the government and sold for export purposes only. A nationwide database of weapons must be created to record every weapon manufactured, stored, transported, sold, exported, etc to create traceability for every serial number.

Banning all guns is absolutely necessary but not sufficient. We need a fundamental transformation in the way we live our lives, teach tolerance in schools and our leaders should make less militant appearances. If we value freedom and wish to remain free citizens, we must be willing to chart this difficult course.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 3rd, 2013.

Reader Comments (6)

  • John B
    Jan 3, 2013 - 12:11AM

    A better alternative would be apprehend and convict the criminals through effective policing and court system.

    Recommend

  • Ricky
    Jan 3, 2013 - 12:30AM

    This is the only solution of killings in Karachi. What would be the future of Pakistan when the religious leaders use guards with heavy weapons and bullet proof cars? Can anybody show religious leaders in the other countries travel like this? The automatic weapons must be totally banned and Police be provided with more weapons and support.

    Recommend

  • enu
    Jan 3, 2013 - 4:37AM

    This is one of the two most urgently required steps needed, the other being to seal the borders as much as is possible.

    Recommend

  • karma
    Jan 3, 2013 - 8:44AM

    Great idea Sir!

    This is something I have always supported. Having too many guns floating around is a recipe for disaster.

    In USA, gun control would be easier to implement as outlawing it will automatically force citizens to surrender their guns (well mostly). In pakistan, how can this be implemented? Will one go and ask each person, if he has a gun? And if he would be kind enough to sell it to govt? Pakistani gun owners won’t be law abiding.

    So, If he doesn’t surrender then what? Is the govt. is capable enough to enforce its will in its own territory? If it can’t enforce its tax laws, how will it enforce far more stronger action?

    India has strong laws against illegal weapons, but illegal weapons still thrive in states where governance is poor (UP/Bihar, North east etc.). So, What matters most is state’s capability to enforce its law. In India politicians of certain states wink at the gangsters owning illegal weapons, but it is not rampant.

    But, Pakistan has large swathes of its land with large militia owning guns and other weapons. So, enforcing its law will entail a Army action. Question is if army is capable of doing this, and if it is – is it willing!!

    Recommend

  • Ali
    Jan 3, 2013 - 9:51AM

    Deweaponisation is the only hope and only solution to control the waves of violence across the country. Karachi, the most violent city, is the best point to start with.

    Recommend

  • cautious
    Jan 4, 2013 - 9:52PM

    We need a fundamental transformation
    in the way we live our lives, teach
    tolerance in schools

    Fix that first and you may find guns are not the priority.

    Recommend

More in Opinion