Words, statements and various kinds of writings can all be interpreted in different ways. This, indeed, is already happening in the context of the strong remarks made by army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani in his address to officers at the General Headquarters. But comments — particularly when they are as strong as these — need to be put into a proper context, and for Pakistan, the context consists of long periods of military rule, punctuated by civilian democracies, which, too, almost constantly experienced the hot breath of the men in khaki right over their shoulders. This chain of events has shaped our history and the realities we face today as a nation. Given this, the army chief’s words take on a more ominous tone and tenor.
General Kayani, in his rather unexpected speech, spoke of no single institution alone, having the authority to determine national interest or being its “ultimate arbiter”. However, it is important to note that it is accepted universally that in a parliamentary democracy, the people through their representatives in parliament, are the ultimate arbiters of what constitutes the national interest. The address contained few soft words and could be seen by many as a response from an institution increasingly finding itself cornered because of rising public scrutiny and criticism of various aspects of its performance and role, as mandated by the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Asghar Khan case that held the ISI and the then military chief responsible for the distribution of funds to political parties to rig the 1990 polls, does not seem to have gone down well in military circles. Neither have other actions by the court in cases of corruption involving military men. The army has, in certain instances, moved to protect its own — even reinducting retired officers into the service to ‘protect’ them. How this serves the ‘national interest’ that the military seems to be so attuned to speaking of is something to ponder upon.
The army chief confessed that mistakes had been made by the army in the past — which is certainly a positive aspect of the speech — but also warned against “weakening institutions” in any way or attempting to act against them. There is little room for doubt to be found between the tightly spaced words that this was, in fact, a response to the public reaction to the Asghar Khan case and perhaps, directly towards the Supreme Court, especially since there was a reference to institutions working within their constitutionally-defined boundaries. Despite General Kayani’s carefully posed stance as being ‘non-political’ and ‘pro-democracy’, it is clear that like many of his predecessors, he is not accustomed to a situation where the military is, in any fashion, taken to task or awkward questions raised about its actions. Certainly, the army chief must also have been under pressure to defend a force, which many feel, sees itself as being the only truly ‘patriotic’ entity in the country. Any nuance of criticism has been interpreted by the military as being a slap in the face and the Supreme Court’s actions may have come across as such to the military. This explains why the military has found them difficult to swallow.
So, do we have new lines of battle shaping up between key institutions? We certainly hope not. The chief justice, while hearing a petition pertaining to media criticism of the army, following the May 2011 raid to capture Osama bin Laden, has chosen to parry General Kayani’s lunge. He has said that today, tanks and missiles cannot guarantee national security. There is no denying this. Indeed, a democracy that functions smoothly can alone ensure this. We must hope then that calm will prevail. But if this is to happen, the military needs to step down from the pedestal onto which it has elevated itself and accept that it stands at the same rank as other institutions, with constitutionally-determined functions that it has to follow. The fact that it hits out whenever it perceives a provocation of any kind has been made is disturbing. If we are to achieve true stability, this mindset must change. Otherwise, our troubles will multiply.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 7th, 2012.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Gen Kayani, Who? You are not authorised to give your opininon without the consent of elected Parliament to which you serve.
Tanks and Guns cant protect the country and democracy can?? a democracy in which the entire wealth of the country is syphoned off to swiss account? which democracy are we talking about here? is it american democracy who has stooges set to rule our country?? or the democracy in which people like Dr Arslan Iftikhar thrive???? are you kidding me?
Rich tributes and homages to Judiciary for this courageous steps and bold bolds and also to ET.
The editorial nowhere mentions, kayanis remarks for the media itself. A 5th column journalist i assume.
@anwar jawaid: I know the USA well because I have been living here for the past 48years, which country do you want to compare Pakistan with, Saudi Arabia, some African country or some banana republic. Half of Pakistan's life had been ruled by the Military and it was Mush who has given the Americans the air force bases to fly their drones and kill the Pakistani citizens unless you think FATA is not Pakistan's territory and the inhabitants are not Pakistanis.You pay the Army to safeguard the borders and not to be ruling the country with the barrel of gun, it is as simple as that, and do respect your constitution and Pakistan will become an exemplary country to the rest of the world.
The rule of law should win.......... that is it!
If u can't look into the mirror then yiu should break the mirror this is the strategy of generals towards media and SC
I pray General Wins
Another bout of shadow boxing .....
In most democracies, a serving chief warning/threatening any other institution would immediately result in his dismissal. In Pakistan, he perhaps gets another extension.
I am ashamed of Judiciary. They have done nothing for the people of Pakistan. They have converted this institution into a money making private company.
Judiciary in General and Supreme Court in particular is being view as politicized and self aggrandizing. People expect that courts should act publicly in a political neutral way. The clusters of interests representing members of the Lawyers community make their way to top jobs in Judiciary. It needs a sophisticated tools and theories for controlling these interests and managing conflicts of interest. Judicial reforms are need of the hour. Judicial service needs to be strengthened so that the judges are inducted from the service rather than nominating them from the bar, who are politicized, has developed business clientage and most of them continue to run their chambers through proxies. Beside every thing else they had by that age developed strong biases.
@ naeem khan & pan mat: why is always a comparison with US. We are Pakistan, 180 degrees different culture etc. There are hundreds of nations to be compared with. Our army if one of the greatest and bravest in the world. It is the political might, the self claimed saviors who have and are doing their best to defame the army. We forget the past, Kashmir 1949, Shimla 1965, East Pakistan 1971 and Kargal. Why?????
All rubbish. Are we talking about the Chief justice and Chief of the Army staff of a country or gotham city? We dreamt that we will make our country a real model state. We blamed all the politicians of this country for making mochery of the law, an un-cleanable mess. We thought we need a batman to do the impossible. ....... Then came the Supreme Court's decision in Asghar khan case and we thought that we needed someone without wearing a mask and we have found that person already in the shape of the present Chief of the Army Staff Mr. Kayani because the Supreme Court cannot give a verdict like that without the blessing of the Army Chief. We thought that he honestly wanted to get this country back on track. That he knew his limits, will implement these practically and will not cross them, just to clear the name of the Army from being partial and/or above the law. That he was not Zia ul Haq. Let me quote a bad character from Christopher and Jonathan Nolan's script of The Dark Knight saying, "I am a guy with a simple taste. All you care is about money. This town deserves a better class of criminal. Introduce a little anarchy....upset the established order and everything becomes chaos. Their morals, their code is a bad joke ... dropped at the first sight of trouble.They are only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these .... civilized people .....they'll eat each other....... See I am not monster, I am just ahead of the curves...... The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules........Do I really look like a guy with a plan? You know what I am?... I am a dog chasing cars... I wouldn't know what to do with one if caught....You know....I just do things........ Cleaning this mess is no more the task of a hero."
Chief Justice should also not give any political statement, in courtroom. (as he mention in last media hearing.
Another scandal involving the CJP is in the offing to even the balance between the institutions. The CJP has a few skeletons to hide.
Gen Kayani is a serial offender ++++++++++++++++++++++++
I quote from this very publication during the MemoGate ( remember?)
"In a hard-worded clarification, the army not only rubbished Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani’s accusation that the military and intelligence chiefs had violated the Constitution by submitting replies directly to the court in the Memogate case but also warned of a fallout, which, the statement said, would have “serious ramifications with potential grievous consequences for the country.”
http://tribune.com.pk/story/319788/allegations-by-gilani-against-coas-dg-isi-very-serious-ispr/
How did the country accept an army threatening an elected Prime Minister?
"being a slap in the face " +++++++++++++++++++++ Blatant interference in the working of a democracy deserves that no doubt.
"the military needs to step down from the pedestal onto which it has elevated itself and accept that it stands at the same rank as other institutions, " +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Incorrect. it stands subordinate to the executive,
@Saleem: And don't forget who is killing them (Taliban), Pakistan Army.
@Pan Mat: Well written and I could not have agreed with you more.Thank you.
The solution lies into retiring General Kayani now and let it be known that the constitution does not permit the Chief of the Army to be giving political statements. If this would have happened in the USA, the General would have been shown the exit door in a jiffy but this government in Pakistan is so weak and corrupt that they can't stand up for the constitution, they rather ignore it themselves. Somehow generation after generation has not been brought up to believe in and respect the Constitution and that is the main problem. The Generals, politicians and some bureaucrats think that they are above the law of the land and therefore get away with murder not to mention the rampant corruption. Thank you for writing a soul searching editorial, hope some Generals are reading it.
@SHADI:
Don't forget who created Pakistani Taliban's - army.
Everyone in pakistan jumps at every single opportunity to bash politicians for their incompetence and corruption, however the way i see it the isi and army have always played a roll in forming those corrupt politician, whether its Zardari and Nawaz they are all brain child of the army, just like Taliban and SSP. Zardari was in jail for 10 years under army rule and was never tried or held accountable, Shariff was brought into power by army and then sent packing, not because of his corruption but because of his unwillingness to support war with India. Army loves bringing to light about how corrupt our politicians, but can't for once listen to how they played a major roll in removing fair and honest politicians and bringing these puppet corrupt and incompetent politicians.
Army's hi command in general, and Kiyani in particular, must learn that they are protectors of Pakistani borders. They should focus on external threats and spend their time and energy in cross border threat from Talibans. They can't harbor corrupt, neither can they shield wanted criminals, regardless of their stripes. Army and its generals must learn that they serve people of Pakistan, and should not judge them as inferior or dream of ruling them. Pakistan is moving towards democracy where such unwanted comments could fire a general. Kayani should stay clear of politics and this is not his domain.
In no other country army indulges in public relation exercises as in any democratic Constitution the army is supposed to be under civilian control (Ministry of Defense in Pakistan's case). By virtue of this statement the Army Chief has transgressed the boundaries of his constitutional duties.
In US General McStanley was asked to step down after he spoke about Afghan war without the approval of civilian administration. But General Kayani is safe as an average Pakistani is driven more by emotions based on religion, patriotism, conspiracies & rhetoric of Islamic supremacy rather than rational thinking.
In some ways it is paradoxical that just about everyone in Pakistan is a patriot and yet the country is slipping towards an abyss.
Pakistani Elite ! they all including beaurocracy, politicians, u name it, have made 80 Billion Dollars in last 8 Years in corruption. Congrats to them and keep up putting new dramas and shows for the public, keep them entertained. And do your job of robing this great Nation.