While Woh Humsafar Tha, winner of Best Original Soundtrack and Song of The Year at the Lux Style Awards 2012, had its share of celebrations, it seems the festivities will be short-lived. EMI Pakistan has sent a copyrights infringement notice to Hum TV, (the channel that aired the widely popular Humsafar) regarding the sound track which was composed by Waqar Ali and sung by Quratulain Baloch and received very high ratings (TRPs).
EMI shared documents with The Express Tribune which state that the song Woh Humsafar Tha was originally composed and sung by legendary singer Abida Parveen for her album Latest Ghazals by Abida Parveen, which was released in 1985.
“We sent them a notice about a week ago to get the official license of using this sound track from EMI Pakistan. But so far, they have not got back to us,” Zeeshan Chaudhry, General Manager Marketing, Sales and Strategy at EMI told The Express Tribune. “We’ll send a follow up letter on Wednesday and if we still don’t hear from them, the matter will go into the hands of our legal team.”
Chaudhry spoke about the issue in light of the larger issue of music piracy, saying that people in Pakistan have an unclear and naïve understanding of what it really is. He said that while is it believed locally that creating illegal copies of CDs is piracy, the definition engulfs more. “People are unaware that revamping an already made song in the name of a tribute is a blatant violation of intellectual property rights because neither the label nor the artist gets anything out of it (royalties),” he said.
However, Chaudhry also makes clear that EMI does not intend to bring a decline in the Pakistani music industry, which is the prime reason for why the record company is not putting a high licencing fee on Indian labels that license songs in Pakistan. In the case of Woh Humsafar Tha, the wrongdoer in the eyes of EMI is an independent production house, which EMI says should take this practice seriously. “We appreciate Hum TV for valuing our content, but at the same time, it is copyrights infringement because they reproduced the song without getting an official licence and fulfilling the necessary legal formalities”.
While Abida Parveen refused to comment on the matter, EMI promised that she would be paid her due share once the other party acquires the licence to her song.
“EMI is known for its credibility and regular return of royalties, Abida Parveen will get whatever the signed agreement says about her share in the revenue,” Chaudhry added.
Despite repeated attempts, The Express Tribune was unable to reach Momina Duraid, CEO of Momina Duraid Productions and producer of TV show Humsafar. However, the Public Relations department at Hum TV denied receiving any such copyrights infringement notifications.
“We have not received any legal notifications from anyone up till now,” the general manager of the Public Relations department, Shanaz Ramzi told The Express Tribune on behalf of Momina Duraid Productions. “If the matter goes into legal hands because of the lyrics, then we have written permission from the poet, Nasir Turabi himself.”
“Apart from that, the melody is totally different from its previous version and Waqar Ali has exclusively produced this song for the drama Woh Humsafar Tha,” she added.
When asked why it took so long for them to deliver this notice to Hum TV, EMI said that they were involved in a series of other copyright infringement issues, and the process took some time.
If EMI’s claim is valid, the case of Woh Humsafar Tha will surely be amongst the most mindboggling cases of copyrights violations in the history of Pakistani entertainment. Not only did the song become a household melody, it also played a pivotal role in the popularity of the drama Woh Humsafar Tha. Quratulain Baloch, who has one Coke Studio song to her credit, made it big with this soundtrack and gained great popularity.
However, if EMI’s claim is unfounded, it will lose credibility as a record label company and will come across as one that survives on its own legacy of music – an organisation making desperate attempts to catch someone, somehow.
Disclaimer: The Express Tribune is a sister concern of Express Entertainment, a competitive entertainment channel.
Correction: The story previously misspelled 'Woh' as 'Who'. A correction has been made.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The track has been played so many times that I'm sick of it, really. But EMI's claim is absurd and unfounded. If you remix someone else's song, it is your creativity that goes into it and the original artist doesn't deserve anything.
EMI is confusing remixes with covers, and as such Abida Perveen, her greatness notwithstanding, doesn't deserve plaudits for the remixed version especially if HUM TV got permission from the poet for the reproduction. It's HUM TV, Waqar Ali and QB's intellectual property now.
@toobahatif: There are a lot of background things are going on when something is 'remixed'. The case of Woh Humsafar Tha is a bit different. It is a rework of the song with a different setup and a different vocalist. Basically, it was a 'cover'. Again, my point here is where is the money for the poor poet?
Remix doesnt mean royalties shouldnt be paid unless they took permission/agreement to remix it without royalties before doing it .
@Confused: Depends if Khwateen Digest got the rights transferred to their name. Secondly, Humsafar was quite different from the television adaptation. Furthermore, EMI Pakistan is trying to cash in with the fame. Why the notice so late? Furthermore, has EMI paid Nasir Turabi—the poet of the song—anything?
@ fariha Poet of the ghazal, woh hamsafar tha.....is Naseer Turabi not Mohsin Naqvi. A couplet, tark-e-taulluqaat pe roya no tu na mein-...., recited by Abida bibi and QB in between their renderings is the creation of another poet, Khalid Ahmad who was not mentioned in the credits neither by the producer of play humsafar nor by EMI on its cassette's title. Yasser N.
This is sad news!!!!!go EMI go
Have Hum TV paid Khawateen Digest? I believe this drama was first published by Khawateen Digest Group which means that the magazine is the legal owner of the script. While Farhat Ishtiaq should get royalty, shouldn't the Publishers get a share too considering they buy the Rights when the pay the authors for their novels. Doubt any of the concerned parties i.e. the writer, the channel and the publishers followed the legal protocol.
'Who' Humsafar Tha? Come on ET =P
@toobahatif: copying a song = no royalties if its a hit - be cialised and educted!
Well, the poet was Mohsin Naqvi. And Quratul Ain just sang his kalaam, like Abida Perveen did. In Humsafar version melody of Abida's song was not used, so its no way a case of copyright. If someone's approval should be required, was of Mohsin Naqvi sahib. The scenario is same as many people sang Ghalib's ghazals with different melodies....whats a big deal?
Royalties should be paid where they are due. This is how civilized world ensure creativity by protection of new ideas.
why the disclaimer at the end? you should also know that Moomal productions is not independant, it is owned by the son of the owner of Hum TV