Malik set to get central contract

Regular players undergo fitness test in Lahore.


Our Correspondent April 09, 2012

KARACHI: Former Pakistan captain Shoaib Malik looks set to be part of the centrally contracted players list after taking part in the fitness tests held under the supervision of coach Dav Whatmore held at the National Cricket Academy in Lahore.

The tests were conducted on Pakistan’s regular players after the Pakistan Cricket Board decided to check the players’ fitness before handing them new contracts.

Afridi, who lost his contract last year after announcing his conditional retirement from the international cricket, was also present in Lahore while Malik, who was snubbed by the selectors for the Asia Cup squad, was also absent from the list that was announced last August.

Meanwhile, players, including captain Misbahul Haq appeared for the test where they were asked to perform different exercises to display their stamina.  Saeed Ajmal, Mohammad Hafeez and Umar Akmal missed the trial due to various reasons.

The PCB is yet to announce this year’s contracts, which was delayed after the change in the selection panel following the series against England in the UAE.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 10th, 2012.

COMMENTS (16)

A.S.Ahamed Farooq | 11 years ago | Reply

I support giving Malik a central contract but the Board should make sure that he has recovered his batting form.When in form Malik is capable of playing match winning innings.Whatmore should take Malik,Umar Akmal and few others under his wing give few hints and do some intensive coaching to sharpen their talents.Malik is a very good middle order batsman.

dr hassan | 12 years ago | Reply

Aoa we must give Ahmed shahzad a chance...he is aggressive..technically very sound..he is just 20 yr...as far as his displine is concern..if managment cant control a 20 yr old guy than i thing a manager is useless in the team....

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ