A blog on the Asian Development Bank’s website lists some of the reasons why this is so. Transport, it says, is now recognised as a key pillar of a nation’s economy; it plays a key role in poverty reduction and inclusive growth; it will be the key to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions; mass transit systems are becoming increasingly viable for a large spectrum of cities and sustainable transport is the new paradigm in the transport sector.
Transport must not be seen only as an infrastructure issue, but rather as an integral part of the fundamental right of movement. Cities must ensure that residents have a variety of options to exercise this right.
In this backdrop, it was news, indeed, that the Government of Punjab has initiated a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project along Lahore’s Ferozepur Road between Chungi Amer Sidhu and Kalma Chowk. But a closer look at the project reveals the need to have a system of evaluating the effectiveness of transport initiatives. There’s no point in spending money –– for the 7.3 kilometre Ferozepur Road BRT project, Rs1.54 billion –– if there’s not going to be any accountability.
The PC-1 form for the Ferozepur Road BRT project, submitted in February 2012, states that the project objectives and its relationship with sector objectives are: “To provide accessible and time-saving travelling; to develop an environmentally friendly traffic system; to control vehicle emission; the BRT system with a designed speed of 25km/h will ensure travel time saving against the existing speed of 15km/h during peak hours; the BRT Project will lower the demand of wagon and motorcycle rickshaw thus lowering the emission. Furthermore, the BRT vehicle will have emission of EURO II standards, reducing the adverse environmental effects. The BRT is designed for a capacity of 8,000Pphpd (passenger-per-hour-per-direction) and work as Mass Transit.”
The description of the project cites growing congestion near the Ravi Bridge and Walled City stating that a BRT solution is most viable and that the Chungi Amar Sidhu-Kalma Chowk corridor is selected for implementation of BRT and will be extended in phases.
In its ‘projects benefits and analysis’ section for financial, economic and social benefits with indicators, the PC-1 states, in toto: “Efficient, comfortable and reliable transport system with improved safety conditions shall have positive socio-economic impact to the society. The BRT seeks to optimise the use of existing facilities and Right of Ways (RoW) so that mobility and commerce needs can be met.” The document is signed by the Director (Engineering Construction) of The Traffic and Engineer Planning Agency (TEPA), the Chief Engineer, TEPA, the Director General, Lahore Development Authority and the Secretary, Housing, Urban Development and Public Health Engineering Department and was approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Because the BRT project, in essence, is a remodeling of Ferozepur Road, it is a road transport project in excess of Rs50 million for which, under the Pakistan Environment Protection Act (PEPA) of 1997, an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) is required.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Punjab published notices of the public hearing of the EIA on February 28, 2012. This hearing allowed the public and the people affected by the construction of the project to share their comments on the impacts the project will have on their environment. These may include queries about the design of the project or other concerns. The EPA, Punjab is then required to review the EIA and grant environmental approval to the project subject to conditions it may impose. The EPA’s notice states that the public hearing will be on March 31, 2012.
Everything appears, at first sight, to be above board –– except that the chief minister inaugurated the project on March 12, 2012 and announced that it would be completed by April.
Why is there such a rush to come up with and implement transport projects? Why can’t the Government of Punjab follow the law and plan for sustainable transport instead of pushing ahead with hitherto unheard of initiatives? Despite its commendable aim and purpose, the Ferozepur BRT project may become a victim of rushed planning and may not result in the level of service promised.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Faraz i am also agree with you you say right Regards Manzoor
i agree with faraz there is no need to such rapid system becuase in our country 99% peoples having no sence of trafic rules (u can see currently 9 no route buses conditions, although buses were outclass but peopels of lahore are not able to this facility, because majority of rural areas on ferozepur road and they are not having sence of travelling as well as students.
@Fareeha Khan: Center green field was left intentionally for mass transit but unfortunately federal govt. refused to endorse the project since it was foreign aided project. Anyway a good project by CM hope it will be operated on BOT basis
@ Rashid, excellent comment,
I don't understand why Pakistan does not have Metro rail system, at least for Karachi and Lahore. These seem to be quite huge cities, and I don't think they are so poor that people cannot afford train ticket.
The last line: "Despite its commendable aim and purpose, the Ferozepur BRT project may become a victim of rushed planning and may not result in the level of service promised." could have been put this way: "The Ferozepur BRT project may become a victim of rushed planning, but it still possesses a commendable aim and purpose."
Why are we so inclined to be negative?
@hamid abassi,Russianroulette,Umar kuddos!
@others there exists a disheartened atompshere throughout Pakistan, and I'd like to remind everyone of the difficulty in achieving our own endeavors. To point to the flaws in anothers feats is easier than to propose VIABLE solutions. embrace the hard work of our leaders in as much as they are doing, provide inertia to the positive instead of complaining (as we all do) of what is lacking and of 'the way thing are' be the change.
Cities suffering from low density sprawl often seek similar solutions which are both expensive and short term. Cities aught to densify to address much of its issues including those relating to urban transport. I wonder if Kalma Chowk has the capacity to handle / absorb passenger transfer @ 8,000 Pphpd during morning peak hours on sustainable basis. Designers of the project should address this aspect on long term basis.
"Ferozepur BRT project may become a victim of rushed planning and may not result in the level of service promised"
Premature, nay-sayers, prophets of doom & jealous...!!!
@Russianroulette: Well Said!
@Optimist:
He was not able to build project like these in first two years because a lot of money was spent on flood victims. Since, Punjab is the only province where rapid developments are taking place, so we must appreciate it. It is better that though he is late but at least he is doing it now.
the writer ignore another serious aspect that the same road (on which this rapid bus services is constructed ) has been rebuild two months ago with billions of rupees , the center green belt and service lanes were built and it was considered to be model road by Shebaz sharif himself....BUT myopic planning ......and after success of multi billion "MOdel road" whole road was destroyed to rebuild again for this bus system....no logic is understandable y this huge massive lack of olanning in this acute fiscal deficit.....
hmmm i feel though Mr Rafay portrayed an "Anarchy or One Man Show" going on in Punjab through a practical demonstration of Mass Transit.............a sane mind would feel that the attributes of the project itself gives a thumbs up to the whole mystery surrounding CM Shahbaz and his "Rush Ons"..............The loop holes are always present but one must give weightage to the intentions.............Thanks God its not another theory claiming hidden hand implementing projects to turn Raiwind into Paris............ For doing projects that will power our future.........guddies to the CM
@faraz: Please update your knowledge then write. @Optimist: Doing better then central government and other provinces suppose there is PPP government then what happend Faislabad gas stopage is example for you so be positive.
Have been hearing of mass transit in our cities for over 20 years... why is there a problem when someone is getting something done. Obstructing cars in favor of masses being transported, now that is a change one really needs to be embracing!
@Optimist: spot on...agreed
Chief Minister of Punjab delayed everything till 4th year of his government because of elections (public has short memory!!!) . The reason he is pushing this is the fact that there should be 'fresh' roads and voters applaud him. . While it is acceptable for leaders to do something to win votes, how can we forgive Chief Minister for wasting 4 years to implement these basic things (Istanbul cleaning contract, buses, roads etc). . I am not saying that he has done nothing. He has, but IT SEEMS that he left the most important projects till the end of his tenure for election purposes!!
We met in LUMS a day ago and I'm happy that Ahmed wrote something - regardless of being positive or negative - about the BRT.
Its a bad project which makes no sense to 99 percent passengers who dont travel along that single route. It will only obstruct the flow of traffic for other cars. More buses should have been introduced instead of wasting money on this.