Already, for the sake of national unity, Pemra has ‘advised’ the media not to interview Baloch separatist leaders. Once Pemra codifies its power to advise channels on content, strictly in consideration of the national interest of course, we could end up with a scenario where the regulatory authority is dictating every aspect of content.
Pemra may not be the solution but that does not mean that there isn’t a problem with the media. In a rush to break news, channels take all sorts of liberties with facts, run pictures and videos of dead and dying people and can end up interfering with necessary police work at the scene of a crime rather than just reporting on it. Talk shows frequently cross a line of decency and, as we saw in the case of Maya Khan, morning show hosts see themselves as the final arbiter of morality. The solution here, though, is not more government regulation. What we need instead is for all channels to devise a common code of conduct and then have an independent body to ensure that everyone implements it.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Nisar Hussain: there should be autonomous body to regulate media including all stakeholder and civil society members as far as interviewing baloch leaders then isn't the govt withdrawing cases against them and ready to welcome them, so why not interview them.
government want to use new regulations to advance its political motives before elections specially by using the excuses as national interest, cultural and religious values. The same type of steps are being to curb the internet freedom. The first victim will be audience and internet user. I am not ready to give up my right to information and i strongly condemn this move by government.