Playing the waiting game: Karzai warns against plot to install puppets

Official says Islamabad does not harbour any ‘hidden agenda’ for Afghanistan.


Kamran Yousaf February 20, 2012

ISLAMABAD:


When the Afghan president met with the Pakistani civil and military leadership last week, his main aim was to decipher Islamabad’s ‘real’ position on the Afghan endgame.


At the heart of discussions between the two neighbours was Hamid Karzai’s bold insistence that Pakistan come clean on what exactly it wants in Afghanistan.

During the talks described by Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar as “hard and candid”, the Afghan president asked Pakistan to stop “playing a waiting game”, it was revealed.

A senior Pakistani official familiar with the discussions said that Karzai believed that Islamabad was playing a “wait and see game” on Afghanistan.

“He (Karzai) thinks we are not forthcoming on the peace talks with the Taliban. He believes we are waiting to see the Americans leave the region before we play our cards,” said the official referring to the Afghan president’s latest interaction with the Pakistani leadership.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, also said that Karzai suspected that the Pakistan’s security establishment would want to install a government of its ‘own choice’ in Kabul like it did during the ‘80s.

“If this is your ambition then forget about it. Let me tell you that neither would the Americans leave this region nor would you be able to manipulate the situation as you did in the past,” the official quoted Karzai as having said.

However, the official rejected the Afghan president’s assessment, saying Islamabad does not harbour any ‘hidden agenda’ for Afghanistan.

“Karzai’s remarks reflect his own failure and frustration to succeed and lead his country to peace and prosperity,” the official rebutted.

However, the foreign ministry spokesperson did not offer any comments on the discussions that took place between President Karzai and the Pakistani leadership.

Karzai visit – which began with expectations that it would bring the two neighbours closer to a joint strategy on the Afghan reconciliation process – is believed to have ended in a deadlock.

The contentious point appeared to be Kabul’s expectations that Islamabad must bring Afghan Taliban leaders, including Mullah Omar, to the negotiating table — with the presumption that the country’s military establishment still enjoys considerable clout over these insurgents.

But Pakistan was quick to reject the assessment in unusually harsh remarks by Foreign Minister Khar.

“Deliver Mullah Omar? If these are the expectations, then there are no reality checks … They are not only unrealistic, they are preposterous,” she said minutes after Karzai addressed a joint news conference with his Pakistani and Iranian counterparts.

‘No peace because of Pakistan’

An Afghan presidential adviser on Sunday accused Pakistan of playing a double game, promising to work for peace while using the Taliban and other groups as proxies to advance its interests in Afghanistan.

“They (Pakistan) say one thing and do another. There is no doubt that Taliban leadership and Mullah Omar are in Quetta. They recruit and fund people to create instability on this side,” Assadullah Wafa told Reuters.

“We have been deprived of peace in the country for the last 30 years and it is because of our neighbours.”

Afghan government efforts to bring the Taliban into peace talks are floundering and bold steps are needed to ensure that a council spearheading the reconciliation process can win the trust of insurgents, said Wafa.

(With additional input from Reuters)

Published in The Express Tribune, February 20th, 2012.

COMMENTS (32)

Freidun | 12 years ago | Reply

There is hope for Afghans if Pakistan acts responsibly and ends its duplicity.

Pashtun voice | 12 years ago | Reply

HAHAHA....Karzai should not be moaning about puppets.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ