One thought that the job of creating a negative list should have been completed in preparation of the current February visit of the Indian delegation, but there could be other reasons why Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani would want to go slow. He is in trouble with the judiciary, doesn’t enjoy good relations with the army, which controls the country’s foreign policy, is facing a bristling opposition in parliament, which will not be satisfied completely with the sop of the 20th Amendment and is trembling before a rising storm of concealed non-state actors within the so-called Defence of Pakistan Council (DPC) which won’t allow open trade with India.
The Gilani government is better-placed than the Musharraf regime to grant the MFN status to India. The Chambers of Commerce and Industry are united in their approval and most of the leaders in the industrial sector actually think India’s market is the next plausible target for them after the virtual destruction of the Pakistani market by terrorism. India gave Pakistan the MFN status in 1996; Pakistan is still dithering in 2012. The latter is also facing economic collapse because of its internal disorder and an unleashing of jihadi forces which the state can hardly control. Meanwhile, Indo-Palk trade languishes at $2.7 billion and ‘informal trade’ is touching $10 billion, all to the disadvantage of Pakistan’s exchequer.
The Indian side is understandably keen. It wants to open another trading point at Munabao-Khokhrapar on the Sindh-Rajasthan border, to prevent the concealed non-tariff barrier of a single inlet at the Lahore border. The Commerce Ministry in Islamabad was no less keen last year, as was apparent from its enthusiastic statements but come February, a lot of cold water has been poured over this enthusiasm by developments inside Pakistan. The layman is not able to grasp why the MFN is being given to ‘enemy’ India. Why call it the enemy? Because the media is bombarding his ears with how India is not yielding on Kashmir, is stopping Pakistan’s water through illegally built upriver dams, interfering in Balochistan and cooperating with the US and Israel to snatch Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal?
Warlike revisionist Pakistan doesn’t properly comprehend the importance of trade in the resolution of deadlocked disputes. Television anchors refer to India’s stubborn resolve not to discuss bilateral disputes and look at the MFN issue as a leverage that should highlight the ‘disputes first’ approach the world learned to set aside a long time ago. The Indian side is obviously less bothered about Pakistan — which it should have been because of the Mumbai attack — and has removed its objection to European Union’s decision to allow concessional trade in 75 Pakistani commodities. Of course, the Indian experts know that Pakistan has the right to protect itself against India’s dominant economy through the negative list and by insisting on the removal of all kinds of non-tariff barriers mounted by India unfairly against its imports.
The Pakistan Army had once expressed its ‘no objection’ to free trade with India. It needs to make another statement on this matter so that the jihadis gathered under the banner of DPC may quieten down a little, given the fact that ex-ISI bosses — one gathering in Peshawar organised by ex-Jamaat chief, Qazi Hussain Ahmad featured Generals (retd) Hamid Gul and Asad Durrani — attend its rallies.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@fahim: just a correction on your figures. India's total trade in 2010-2011 was $ 620b. Exports was $ 251 , Imports $ 370b and a trade deficit of $ 119b. To put things in perspective , Indias total trade with Pakistan is at $2.6b, a shade lower than Nepal at $2.7b.
@harkol: mate in India have very high hope for our mother land, because after Indian economic reforms we have lifted almost 330 million Indians out of poverty and made them the middle income family which is equal to the population of America, also I work in IT industry in Dubai and many of my friends now earn almost equal or more then me in Indian IT companies, we in India don't need a China model growth because with our current model we are able to achieve a growth rate of around 8% for the last 10 years and which is very impressive for a large economy like India, what we in India need is invest more in our human resource I.E many world class education institution to take us to next level of growth.....
Tough test for Pakistan democracy. If they bow to the pressure of terrorist of DFC then they would loose credibility in the world.. Indian commerce minister going for small trade opportunity with such a big delegation and then protecting pakistan's delay in media is being watched everywhere.
But at the same time India should give sufficient time to pakistan bcoz they are going through tough internal crisis.
Lets not lose sleep over Pakistan's dithering on MFN...afterall they have already given us the MFE ( most favourite enemy) status :)..MFN can wait for another 60 years and who is gonna be the loser........don't we all know !
There is no hope for either Pakistan or India, as long as they don't realize that economic growth is the only way to attain the living standards the subcontinent enjoyed before the British occupation.
India was invaded by Many Muslim marauders but, they either raided like bandits, or stayed back and contributed to the growth of India. In both cases, they didn't harm India like British did - Where they retarded the economic growth by suppressing industry, trade and manufacturing, and pushed sub-continent to a agrarian subsistence. India grew at less than 2% for over 200 years and fell behind most other countries, from being an economic leader in 1700s.
To solve this the only way is a focus on growth, like china did. All other issues are distractions.
@Mir Agha: Right to their views???? They never gave that right to shehzad salim or many other journalists in pakistan How come u r concerned about DPC' views
a rising storm of concealed non-state actors within the so-called Defence of Pakistan Council (DPC) which won’t allow open trade with India.
History shows pandering to a similar crowd led to break up of India in 1947 and Pakistan in 1971. Once these guys are pennyless than they will realize how economy is more imprtant than other issues. As long as their fat check is coming they will say whatefver their handlers want them to say. It is (still) the economy stupid.
Firstly i think india cares a damn about puny pakistani trade of 2 billion against its own 750 billion trade (with 300 billion exports). We have much more to lose that india if this deal fails. Anyways, there are not much domestic industry left. Whatever here and there are all mortgaged to the chinese. What if we lose this opportunity? What if India revokes the MFN it has given us 17 years ago?
DPC is playing a democratic role as a lobby, and one should be thankful that they are participating in the political set-up. They have a right to their views just like the ones yelling conspiracy theories against Pakistan.