‘Akmal should not have come back after Sydney’

Following Kamran Akmal’s dismal performance behind at Trent Bridge, his sacking is expected from the Test squad.


Faras Ghani July 31, 2010

NOTTINGHAM: Following Kamran Akmal’s dismal performance behind the stumps at Trent Bridge, calls are ripe once again, including from the team officials, for his sacking from the Test squad.

While latching onto every opportunity off the bat in the series against Australia, his reach against the swinging ball was widely questioned. However, the drop off Mohammad Aamir in the fifth over of the first Test against England amplified cries for his ouster.

“Akmal should’ve stayed out of the Test squad after his omission from the final Test in Australia [at Hobart],” a Pakistan team official told The Express Tribune. “He doesn’t look 100 per cent confident behind the stumps and these missed opportunities dent the whole team’s confidence.”

Sarfraz Ahmed was rushed to Australia following Akmal’s disastrous performance in Sydney but  the young wicket-keeper has now been confined to wilderness and looks fourth in line behind Akmal. Zulqarnain Haider is the preferred backup for Akmal for the long tour of England and Sarfraz has also been overlooked for Pakistan A duties for the tour of Sri Lanka next month.

“What was the point in the Pakistan Cricket Board sending out Sarfraz as his replacement all the way to Australia if they didn’t want to keep him as backup for longer. Sarfraz is fit, energetic and certainly a good candidate as Akmal’s replacement the board should’ve stuck with him.”

However, it looks highly unlikely that Akmal will be replaced from the Test squad given Pakistan’s fragile batting line-up. His performance with the bat in England has been less than satisfactory and the lack of experience in Pakistan’s middle-order will force the team’s persistence with him. Calls for his inclusion as a specialist batsman, too, have been downplayed given his batting record in England.

“If you drop Akmal as the keeper, he can’t justify his place in the team given his batting record. He plays the rare innings but is far from consistent and including him will only force us to play another inexperienced individual in difficult conditions.”

Published in The Express Tribune, July 31st, 2010.

COMMENTS (13)

Reddy | 13 years ago | Reply I liked the look of Zulquarnain. the fight he showed in that one innings is more than what Paki players have shown in their entire careers. Hopefully and ideally this should be the end of Akmal. But this is Pakistan we are talking about and I wont be surprised if Akmal Sr first makes his way in to the team as a batman ( Even though he has done little of not in the last 10 visits to the crease )and then nudges out Haider as the keeper. then it will all back to normal. But I enjoyed the Haider/Ajmal partnership as I would have enjoyed an Indian fight back. Always like an underdog.
Faisal Shaji | 13 years ago | Reply well it is no karachi or lahore card. k Akmal has a track record of dropping catches in crucnh games. I my self have played first class cricket in Lahore. And I am advocating Hafeez and Taufeeq Umer who are good genuine openers. Then Khurram Manzoor is good. We have lost Asim Kamal due to bad management but I think still there are good players such as Quetta's Shoaib Khan and Multan's Naveed Yaseen who have been ignored over unknown Azhar Ali and Umer Amin. Tell me why Khurram Manzoor did not get the nod after scoring good 77 at Hobart test. or for that matter Hafeez despite being in good form. and if you remember how cronyism plays. Had Waqar Younus prevailed he could have got his hometown pal Irfan, an ordinary lad, included instead of Umar Gul but lucky sense prevailed. I think Nic Robertson, eminent commentator and writer described Faisal Iqbal as one Pakistani player who has got every short in the book. I dont think Mr Riaz is correct when saying that Faisal has failed on occasions. Pakistan has played inconsistent cricket but he had scored. He is misreporting here.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ