OBL hideout: US Embassy counters Panetta's statements

Defence department spokesperson clarifies that Panetta's interview to CBS was old.


Web Desk January 29, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The US Embassy in Islamabad issued a statement on Sunday countering Defence Secretary Leon Panetta’s statement about Pakistani officials being aware of Osama bin Laden’s hideout.

Defense Department spokesman George Little, in the statement, clarified that Panetta’s interview aired by CBS was old and was recorded at the time when the Defence Ministry was unsure whether the Bin Laden network was present in Pakistan or not.

Little further said that Panetta, in the same interview, had also said that there was no proof that Pakistani government and the higher authorities were aware of Bin Laden’s whereabouts.

He added that Panetta, along with other officials, are working for the betterment of ties with Pakistan that were strained after the US operation in Abbottabad that killed al Qaeda chief Bin Laden on May 2.

In an interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes”, Panetta said that he still believed someone in authority in Pakistan knew where Bin Laden was hiding before US forces went in to find him.

Intelligence reports found that Pakistani military helicopters had passed over the compound in Abbottabad, according to the interview.

COMMENTS (28)

Ahmer Ali | 12 years ago | Reply

Very well done and said Mr. Panetta.It seems you have same qualities and features as PM Gillani has of taking back or withdrawing his words after saying against and taking back notifications after issuing against any one/person/department.

Malatesh | 12 years ago | Reply

**@American pakistani @Hammad Kakar @stenson @Bakir

grow up men.. grow up.. Let your government deny the fact of OBL presence is Pakistan. Why your gvt is still shouting that killing OBL in Abottabad is attack on its Sovereignty? what about OBL wives found in that compound?**

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ