The military has called back one officer from each of four posts to army headquarters, the paper said.
Pakistani officers work alongside Nato at four bases along the Afghan border to try to ensure that both sides know the locations of friendly troops.
Lt Col Jimmie Cummings, a spokesperson for the international coalition in Kabul, said the Pakistani military had not notified international forces of any official withdrawal.
“We look forward to continuing our long relationship with them,” he was quoted by The Telegraph as saying.
Recalled for consultation
Two senior military officials were quoted by CNN as saying the recall of troops is part of Pakistan’s investigation into the cross-border Nato airstrike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.
The army spokesperson Major General Athar Abbas, however, said the decision to recall officers from the joint border posts was not intended as a protest.
“Some of them have been called back for consultation but only temporarily,” The Telegraph quoted him as saying. “This is all about improving the consultation with international forces in Afghanistan.”
The Pakistani soldiers will return to their posts after the consultations are complete, Abbas said.
Meanwhile, Captain John F Kirby, the acting deputy assistant secretary of defense said he hopes Pakistan’s officers can return to border coordination centers soon.
Speaking to The Express Tribune late Tuesday, Captain Kirby said: “We are aware that Pakistan has decided to remove some of their liaison officers from some of the border coordination centers. This is certainly Pakistan’s right. We hope those liaison officers can resume their duties soon inasmuch as their presence is designed to help us reduce the risk of another such incident occurring.”
With additional reporting by Huma Imtiaz in WASHINGTON
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2011.
COMMENTS (35)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@maestro: "Don’t judge a nation of 180 million by a few bad apples."
The problem here is bad apples are close to the power in Pakistan. The "bad apples" also provide state protection and patronage to bad guys from all over the world. The "bad apples" prefer the company of the terrorists to friendship with 1 billion people.
"Pakistan leaving border coordination units on Afghan border". A good example of how not to write a headline. The headline could be understood as saying that Pakistan is leaving in place the border coordination units on the Afghan border while in actual fact what was being said is clear in the first few lines of the main story, that 'Pakistan is pulling out troops from...... border coordination units at the Pak-Afghan border'. Expect better from the ET.
" a Pakistani officer as saying that the information given to the Pakistani border coordination unit prior to the attack was incorrect."
What information was that, exactly?
Please help me understand this. First Pakistan threatened that if its forces were attacked by NATO on the western border , they would move the forces to Eastern border. Now it has vacated itrs posts on the western border in retaliation of attacks and incursions ? So if someone attacks Pakistan forces , in retaliation, Pakistan retreats and vacates its positions so that its not attacked anymore ? Did I get this wrong ? e
The price of cooperation keeps getting more and more. This can only continue till the US forces withdraw. After that or even after the US elections in Nov 2012, it would be treated as extortion and blackmail. It is an open secret and both sides know about it.
@Anjan its better to watch AnjaanaAnjanee instead of commenting here
Good step, USA leave us alone
Pakistani public opinion is anti-US for some time now. Presently we are seeing a anti-Pakistan public opinion developing in US. US public opinion about Pakistan is graduating from being disturbing to difficult. Such statements by the opposition senators there suggests that Americans are getting fed up and are looking in terms of punishing Pakistan. Further we are going to have elections in the US very soon. With US-Pak relations sliding as rapidly as they are Pakistan bashing can really emerge as a prime election activity in the near future in USA. ( source: http://707monty.blogspot.com )The Republicans will have a real opportunity of converting the general hate towards muslims in USA into a ” Punish Pakistan ” campaign. Such a campaign can have a larger mass appeal than the usual promise of economic recovery about which the US voters are already somewhat heart broken. A promise of a hard policy towards Pakistan can emerge as a potential game changer for the Republicans specially if Obama administration presents a soft face on Pakistan now.
Pak will open all door to the US if US just blocked the all foreign accounts of Pak leaders.
I am sure NATO or Afghanistan could care less whether you close your border outpost -- it is apparent that these outpost have never been effective in keeping terrorist from moving from crossing the border.
@maestro: Then why play denial game until cornered, to even acknowledge the basic fact that these were Pakistanis and why did the Govt not even accept the dead bodies back???? So they can keep up their denials !!!!!
big oppurtunity!!!!!! govt can take bold decision to restore his confiodence among masses and shut the mouth of opposition
If Iran can shoot down drones, Pakistan can do way better... but our leaders are all "mir jaffars"
We have protected them for ten long years.This is an intelligent move,now let them fight for themselves & have the taste of their own medicine.We are not the 53rd state of the US.
@Ram: Dear sir, a large number if not majority of Pakistanis condoled 26/11. It was a disgusting act of violence against innocents - my own mother was visiting Mumbai 2 weeks before and had lunch at the Taj - she cried when she heard the news - she just said oh my God I was just there! Don't think that Pakistanis didnt feel your pain that day. On the same token, Indians should also publicly condole terrorist events in Pakistan like the Islamabad Marriot blast that killed over 60! This kind of reciprocity is what will break down these walls of mistrust between us. And thank you for being kind enough to condole the loss of our soldiers. May India and Pakistan and the rest of the world learn to live in PEACE. The key is to interact not just at a government level but people level. That breaks down all misconceptions and enmity. Trade with each other, play sports with each other, hang out with each other. No government will be able to break that bond once it happens. Don't judge a nation of 180 million by a few bad apples.
@Ture Pakistan: I hope the aid is totally cut and then we will see if it was the right move
@Saj: Don't worry, they won't be getting one anyways. It's not an actual future outcome to be concerned with.
Too late by Pakistan''
@Ram I hope you also sympathise for the tragic death of Pakistanis who lost their lives in Samjhota express carnage due to the terrorism emanating from India. Along with other deaths I also sympathise for the death of Hemnant Karkare who foiled the real culprits of Samjotha Express. Before that investigation India was blaming Pakistan for that incident.
Yes, this is the Direction.
@Ram:
Plz keep your incompetency, to deal your local problems, away from this current situation.
Who killed Hemant Karkray is not a secret now.
Plz deal with people like Colonel Prohet and than you should be playing innocent in this forum.
Waiting for formal apology? mere apology? and not to punish those who were responsible for this "mistake". Just an apology? My heart bleeds
It appears to me that the pressure put by Pak on US is more than what US had put on PAK during OBL raid. While I sympathize for the 24 innocent soldiers / families, I do expect equal, (if not more) sympathy from Pakistanis towards innocent lives lost in Mumbai 26/11 due to terrorism emanating from Pak. Once again my sympathies are for the 24 innocent lives and their families
The news item is somewhat confusing. If Pakistan has decided to vacate the border posts to prevent another tragedy, why does that lead to NATO being 'more cautious to prevent another mistake'. There can't be another incident of Pakistani soldiers getting caught in the cross fire if they are not there anymore - may be the report is clearly written.
Things unfold in the aftermath of Musharaf's stepping down. He certainly had some dark agreements with the US which had Pakistani forces in some sort of a handicap. But Pakistan army made full use of this incident and has put immense pressure to corner Nato and the US.
After blocking NATO supplies from Pakistani route and getting the Shamshi airbase vacated by the US, Pakistani troops should remain on high-alert position within the territorial limits of the country.
Any air or ground strike by US/NATO forces should be given a forceful reply and any violation of Pakistan airspace by the US/NATO drone should dealt severely. Drone should be shot down at soon as it is seen in the Pakistan’s airspace by our air force pilots without informing the enemy that it is violating Pakistan’s territorial limits.
The water has started overflowing our heads.
We are not meant to sink in any case and under any circumstances.
We do not consider US any more as a friendly country of Pakistan, as friends do not kill friendly soldiers. Mohamad Agency attack by US/NATO forces were not friendly fires.
The nation should be fully prepared to deal with any eventuality and adventurism by the enemy.
A Step in the RIGHT Direction