Share this article
Print this page
Riedel says Pakistan army gradually installing a new military dictatorship, without even needing to resort to a coup.
WASHINGTON: The United States must shift to a strategy of engaging Pakistan while containing the worst “excesses” of its army, an expert who helped develop the current US approach to Islamabad said Monday.
After coming to power in January 2009, President Barack Obama tasked Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer, to chair an interagency review of policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan for the White House.
The review urged close dialogue with Pakistan and an intensification of drone attacks against extremist militants in the lawless tribal frontier in northwestern Pakistan.
“That strategy made sense at the time but I think in the light of developments, it’s time to shift to a policy of engagement and containment,” said Riedel, now a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution think-tank.
“That is to say to continue to engage Pakistan to try to support the development of civilian democracy, to try to help Pakistani economic development but at the same time trying to contain the worst ambitions and excesses of the Pakistani army.”
Speaking at a panel discussion, he said that for now, Washington was “not doing enough on the containment part. We’re slipping and sliding into it, but I think without a coherent framework.”
US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Obama administration had no plans to adopt such a policy at this time.
Ties between Washington and Islamabad took a turn for the worse after a US special operations raid killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in the sleepy Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad in May.
Relations slid to a new low last month when Nato air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border, prompting Pakistan to boycott the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan’s future.
According to Riedel, the Pakistani army is gradually installing a new military dictatorship, without even needing to resort to a coup.
“The new military dictatorship that is emerging in Pakistan will be very different from its predecessors,” he said.
“The facade of civilian government is likely to continue to go on … with very little real power. The media will continue to be very active and alive, except when they criticize the military.”
More in World
US put ‘low priority’ on first India nuclear test
Pakistan must apoligize for all the US and NATO soldiers killed by Al-Qaida during the period OBL was housed in Abbotabad Cantonment.
Recommend
@Narayan:
WTH?? are you serious?? then US should apologize for the 30000+ civilians they killed in Pakistan…I’ll advise you to refrain from commenting on public forums. It exposes your ignorance :p
Recommend
@Naryan
Aray babwa are y working for Americans…Recommend
@Narayan: Indians hate is going too far against Pakistan. I think America and Nato should appologize all with Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan for killing so many Millions of Muslims.
Recommend
What ! ” excesses of the Pakistan army”,Bruce Riedel must qualify.One will not accept unqualified pointing fingers at Pakistan army.
Recommend
one who can ask about his pumpkin no one can dare shoot his son
Recommend
@”Freeman” Thus, should Salafi militants apologize to Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan? Perhaps you don’t get upset when Muslims kill Muslims – only when it suits your narrativeof America. Every day muslims kill muslims and religious minorities (note to “tolerant” Pakistanis – Shia and Ahmadi are slaughtered every week and I’ve yet to see such an outpouring of grief) and Pakistan says nothing.
Why don’t Pakistanis simply admit publicly that they prefer to live in a world ruled by Wahhabi-Deobandi-Salafi obscurantism? Are they too busy updating their facebook pages and buying cool gadgets manufactured by infidels?Recommend
@Adnan:
US killed 30,000 civilians? Then why are you kicking up such a fuss for 24 soldiers? Read the newspapers – the 30,000 civilians were killed by your heroes – the Taliban and allied fundoos.
@Freeman:
This is even better – millions of muslims killed by the US? When did this happen? I accept that the invasion of Iraq was a cooked up story, but total death toll in Iraq by independent ‘muslim’ agencies is not more than 150,000 – out of which only a percentage were killed by the US forces. The number includes the injured as well – and the actual death toll is likely to be 100,000. Your suicide bombers in Pak have managed to kill 1/3rd of that number – in many locations which are not even in a state of war!
The reason why no one takes you people seriously is because of this tendency to exaggerate – victories of muslims/ arabs, losses of life when in conflict with non-muslims, and to hide the facts when the perpetrators are muslims and using the excuse of Islam. No one can help you if you don’t help yourself.Recommend
Another policy which doesn’t pass the smell test. Spending enormous sums of money to support a weak and corrupt civilian govt while containing the military gets you no return on your investment. The govt will still be inept/corrupt and hate you – the military will still be inept/corrupt and hate you – and the people of Pakistan will hate you. Save your money – find some new policy experts.
Recommend
you mean pakistan should change its US strategy…if it still has one….
Recommend