White House calls on Pakistan to break ties with Haqqani Network

Hina Rabbani Khar, Ahmed Mukhtar deny allegations; say US cannot afford to alienate Pakistan or its people.


Reuters September 23, 2011
White House calls on Pakistan to break ties with Haqqani Network

NEW YORK: White House spokesman Jay Carney on Friday called on Pakistan to "break any link they have" with the Haqqani terror network, blamed for attacks in Afghanistan including the recent strike on the US embassy in Kabul.

"We know that the Haqqani network was responsible for the attacks on our embassy in Kabul," Carney said.

"We know that the Haqqani network operates from safe havens in Pakistan, and that the government of Pakistan has not taken action against those safe havens. This has been a longstanding concern of the United States, and one that we discussed with Pakistan, in public and in private," he said.

Carney said that it was "critical" that Pakistan "break any links they have and take strong and immediate action against this network so they are no longer a threat to the United States or to the people of Pakistan."

Pakistan warns US: 'You will lose an ally' if accusations continue

Earlier on Thursday Pakistan's foreign minister said that the United States risks losing an ally if it continues to publicly criticise Islamabad's performance in the war against militancy.

(Read more: ISI targeted in bitter Mullen tirade)

"You will lose an ally," Hina Rabbani Khar told Geo TV in New York.

"You cannot afford to alienate Pakistan, you cannot afford to alienate the Pakistani people. If you are choosing to do so and if they are choosing to do so it will be at their (the United States') own cost."

Khar was responding to Senate testimony by the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, who said Pakistan's top spy agency was closely tied to the Haqqani Network, the most violent and effective faction in the Afghan Taliban insurgency.

Mullen said on Thursday that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) played a role in the September 13 attack on the US embassy in Kabul, supporting militants known as the Haqqani network. That network, he said, is a "veritable arm" of the ISI.

The embassy attack was the latest in a series of violent episodes that have set back US efforts to bring the Afghan war to a peaceful close.

Mullen's comments and Khar's retort mark an unusual escalation of rhetoric between the allies in the struggle against militants and, at least in public, marks a low point in their relationship.

"At the operational level it will be appropriate to say that there are serious difficulties (between the two countries)," Khar told Geo.

In a separate interview with India's NDTV, Khar added: "Pointing fingers at each other will not help. Finding scapegoats will not help ... We want to be a mature, responsible country that is fighting terrorism with a lot of maturity."

The tensions could have repercussions across Asia, from India, Pakistan's economically booming arch-rival, to China, which has edged closer to Pakistan in recent years. A complete break between the United States and Pakistan - sometimes friends, often adversaries - seems unlikely, if only because the United States depends on Pakistan as a route to supply US troops in Afghanistan, and as a base for unmanned US drones.

Pakistan relies on Washington for military and economic aid and for acting as a backer on the world stage. Washington does not want to see further instability in the nuclear-armed country.

But support in the US Congress for curbing assistance or making conditions on aid more stringent is rising rapidly. And Mullen, CIA Director David Petraeus and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have all met their Pakistani counterparts in recent days to demand Islamabad rein in militants.

'Tough messages have been delivered to Pakistan on Haqqani Network'

Amidst harsh public statements on the Haqqani Network to Pakistan from the US government, a US government official told The Express Tribune, "There shouldn’t be any doubt that tough messages have been delivered — from all levels of the US government — to Pakistan on the Haqqani network."

However, the official speaking on background to The Express Tribune said, "the US-Pakistan relationship continues to have real strategic value for both countries, and both countries are committed to continuing to discuss those issues where our interests diverge.”

The statement follows Admiral Mike Mullen's testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee where he accused the Haqqani Network of being supported by the ISI and being responsible for the attack in Kabul carried out on September 13.

Joint operation against terrorists: Mukhtar

Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar on Thursday advised Washington to formulate a joint strategy for an operation against the Haqqani network.

The defence minister was responding to a question in Karachi on the recent warnings of the United States, following the accusation that the ISI was involved in the attacks blamed on the Haqqani network.

Mukhtar stated that if the Haqqani network is the target, then both countries should devise a strategy and take unilateral action against the group.

He was of the view that the US cannot choose to alienate Pakistan at this moment.

He also denied allegations that the ISI was supporting the militant group led by Sirajuddin Haqqani.

He urged Washington to share proof of their accusations before making them public.

COMMENTS (113)

Galneco | 13 years ago | Reply

@Observer

"OK, so drive Haqqanis out to Afghanistan where they may live in ‘complete safety’." So they could continually attack Pakistan from there while the US does nothing? Just like how it played out with the TTP, LeJ, SSP and Nuristan Taliban? Sure. Pakistan will definitely take that under advisement. http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?txttnews[ttnews]=35706&cHash=c186410c2e

"Brilliant, so the US signed peace treaties with TTP ceding Waziristan to TTP." First of all it ceded Swat, and that was something Pakistan tried to bring peace but when it didn't work it attacked them but then the US withdrew its troop presence and let the TTP take shelter in Afghanistan from where they've been attacking Pakistan with complete impunity ever since. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/7590182/Pakistani-military-officials-claim-Nato-forces-failed-to-capture-Taliban.html http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/674796/NATO-Commander-Pakistan-army-chief-discuss-security.aspx

"And it was a US court that let LeJ and SSP killers out?" They were let out because of poor witness protection, not because Pakistan wanted them freed, those acquittals are in no way indications that Pakistan somehow supports them.

"And it was the Law Minister of US Punjab who was seen with them?" No, it was a CIA contractor Raymond Davis whose cellphone was found to have records of contact with the LeJ. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8316286/Detained-US-official-in-telephone-contact-with-Islamic-terror-group.html http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-02-22/news/286215941raymond-davis-taliban-mobile-phones

"And the place where Shia pilgrims got massacred is under US control?" If you mean Balochistan, it's ridden with an insurgency that is being backed from out of Afghanistan. Just ask UN workers in Kabul. http://home.comcast.net/~christinefair/pubs/11springFair.pdf

Galneco | 13 years ago | Reply

@Express Tribune: I had posted 2 comments today in response to Observer, not one. Thank you for posting the latter one of them, please post my first one as well, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ