Sunny
High: 34°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
 
< >

AJK elections: Chaos as CNIC requirement withdrawn within hours

Published: June 26, 2011

MQM decides to boycott elections after postponement of polls in two constituencies.

KARACHI / MUZAFFARABAD: 

The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Election Commission took two decisions that created confusion and chaos in the run-up to the region’s Legislative Assembly election on Sunday (today), raising questions about its own credibility and independence and prompting the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) to boycott the election.

The commission withdrew its decision to require computerised national identity cards (CNIC), bearing address that falls under the jurisdiction of the local polling station, “under pressure” hours after having announced the measure.

Its decision to postpone the elections for three  seats representing the Kashmiri diaspora in Karachi and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa prompted the MQM to boycott the election.

The decision to withdraw the CNIC requirement from voting booths has raised fears of rigging in the elections. The commission itself estimates that up to 15% of the names on the electoral rolls may be bogus. Outside observers believe the number to be as high as 30%.

In a bid to limit the possibility of rigging, the election commission had announced on Saturday that it would only accept CNICs as legal identification at the polling booths. Election officials would be required to ensure that only people whose address fell within the jurisdiction of a particular polling booth would be allowed to vote there.

Immediately after the election commission announced the requirement, several political parties, including the ruling Muslim Conference began agitating against it, which raised the spectre of violence on polling day. Within hours, the requirement had been withdrawn.

“It was withdrawn under pressure… you can understand it,” said one senior official of the AJK election commission, who wished to remain anonymous. He did not clarify whether the pressure came from the AJK government or the Pakistan government.

Electoral rolls in Azad Jammu Kashmir have been notoriously flawed for decades.

Earlier attempts to fix the problem through a CNIC requirement have also been met with stiff resistance. Manzoor Gilani, a former chief election commissioner in the region, said that the Legislative Assembly passed a unanimous resolution against him when he tried to initiate such a measure, forcing him to resign.

Meanwhile the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, which won two seats from the Kashmiri diaspora in Karachi in 2006, has boycotted the election after the election for the seats in Karachi were postponed.

The announcement was made by deputy convenor of the party’s central coordination committee, Farooq Sattar, at a press conference in Karachi. Sattar blamed the Sindh government for the postponement, even though the announcement came from the AJK Election Commission, which said that the law and order situation in Karachi was not conducive to holding an election.

“The undemocratic, unconstitutional and unethical postponement of the elections in three constituencies is part of a nefarious plot to stop the MQM from emerging as the third option to the Kashmiri people,” claimed Sattar.

The MQM won the two seats for the Kashmiri diaspora in Karachi in 2006 and was expected to win them again this year though most analysts did not rate their chances highly at winning other seats in the AJK Legislative Assembly.

Of the 41 directly elected seats for the AJK Legislative Assembly, 29 are based on the constituencies located within AJK itself and 12 represent the Kashmiri diaspora all over Pakistan. Nine of them are in Punjab, two in Sindh and Balochistan, mainly Karachi, and one for the Kashmiris settled in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. Elections were postponed in the latter three. The federal interior ministry, however, claimed in a statement that the MQM and the Pakistan Peoples Party are expected to jointly file a request to the AJK Election Commission asking for a new date for the postponed elections in the three constituencies.

The ministry also denied that it had any role to play in the postponement. (With additional reporting by Umar Nangiana in Islamabad)

Published in The Express Tribune, June 26th, 2011.


Reader Comments (34)

  • Jun 25, 2011 - 6:09PM

    They lost the opportunity to test themselves on other seats of AJK . I must say a wasted opportunity as i would have guided them towards the step they need to take if MQM wish to be a front runner National Level party in 2013 elections.

    Boycotting an election and still being part of government makes no sense .Recommend

  • naUm
    Jun 25, 2011 - 6:20PM

    “the government had set up polling stations in sensitive area of Karachi where MQM workers and voters could not go and vote freely.”Recommend

  • Syed A. Mateen
    Jun 25, 2011 - 6:31PM

    Good and bad luck does not go together.Recommend

  • Hedgefunder
    Jun 25, 2011 - 6:35PM

    It shows that Pakistan is not even capable of holding Elections without hinderance !!!!Recommend

  • Salman
    Jun 25, 2011 - 6:54PM

    PPP seek to play Monopoly over AJK (Karachi Seats). Rehman Malik forced MQM to withdraw from anyone of seat and give it to Faryal Talpur But MQM declined to play any game. Good Stance *MQMRecommend

  • Blithe
    Jun 25, 2011 - 8:14PM

    Is MQM part of the Government or the
    opposition?

    They are perpetually happy to hunt with
    the hounds and run with the hare…

    No principles!Recommend

  • Omer
    Jun 25, 2011 - 8:24PM

    This is how the 2013 elections will be held, rigged and monopolized to its core by the PPP.Recommend

  • Asmat Jamal
    Jun 25, 2011 - 9:00PM

    MQM contest and wins Kashmir elections in Karachi. What an elections????Recommend

  • san
    Jun 25, 2011 - 9:01PM

    MQM and its leader would be hit if they start their own drama on star plus..Recommend

  • grink
    Jun 25, 2011 - 9:01PM

    Peoples party-Jamhooriat kay qatilRecommend

  • QB
    Jun 25, 2011 - 9:43PM

    What a joke — Is there is a place in Karachi where even MQM can not go — If it is true than looks like MQM strategy of gunda gardi has been adopted by other parties as well.Recommend

  • Mohammad naeem
    Jun 25, 2011 - 9:55PM

    Bycotting elections is an stupid ideaRecommend

  • Ali
    Jun 25, 2011 - 10:00PM

    Ha ha ha…
    Like they stood a chance!Recommend

  • Copper
    Jun 25, 2011 - 10:05PM

    MQM stance is as “principled” as the PPP government “principled” decision. Neither wanted fair game.Recommend

  • Raza
    Jun 25, 2011 - 10:06PM

    @Salman:
    They should quit the government then, no?Recommend

  • Iftikhar-ur-Rehman
    Jun 25, 2011 - 10:36PM

    ZARDARI is a very shrewd person. To get the BUDGET passed he literally begged to PML Q and MQM and both joined the Govt. Now after the MONEY BILL drama is over, MQM has lost its value so PPP has taken this step. I am 100% sure MQM will not leave the Govt. because they simply cannot live without being in power. Or maybe they will once again go for the circus of leaving the Govt and then crawl back after a few days.Recommend

  • Khalid Ahmed
    Jun 25, 2011 - 10:53PM

    Very soon some commenter will call MQM as “Indian Agents”.Recommend

  • ImnIndian
    Jun 25, 2011 - 11:00PM

    stop calling it azad. it is anything but azad !!!Recommend

  • Blithe
    Jun 26, 2011 - 12:34AM

    @ImnIndian:
    My friend, then let’s hold a referendum and see
    the results.
    Recall the 700,000 Indian terrorist soldiers
    from Indian Occupies Kashmir and let’s hold
    a referendum as enshrined in UN Resolution.Recommend

  • fantome
    Jun 26, 2011 - 12:38AM

    MQM boycotted the elections because they were found guilty of fake NIC’s to constitute fake voters. Those people were caught and MQM started complaining.. and found that legally they would have lost the battle for seats. As they found it safer to simply divert from the subject.Recommend

  • Faraz
    Jun 26, 2011 - 12:39AM

    @ImnIndian:

    Azad Azad AzadRecommend

  • Jun 26, 2011 - 1:10AM

    Oh, at least one non-State party exits the scene. For whatever it’s worth.Recommend

  • Nadeem Ahmed
    Jun 26, 2011 - 1:23AM

    This is the problem with MQM, JI and Imran Khan. Whenever there is a chance to prove something, they will boycott or hide somewhere. Look at Imran Khan, he has gone to Multan, no sane person would go there in month of june to get his opinion.Recommend

  • Asad
    Jun 26, 2011 - 1:58AM

    @ImnIndian dear indian troll… part of kashmir with less number of soldiers is called azad…Recommend

  • Hassan
    Jun 26, 2011 - 3:18AM

    What? PPP wants MQM to withdraw from a seat so that it can have it and MQM is the bad guy?? PPP tries to strong arm MQM and it is supposed to bow down… Bet all you people would be happy if MQM had agreed to do what PPP asked it to..Recommend

  • Syed
    Jun 26, 2011 - 3:41AM

    @ Khalid Ahmed,
    yup people waste no time in placing ‘misplaced blames’

    @ QB get a life you sore looser!Recommend

  • naseer
    Jun 26, 2011 - 3:46AM

    this is the double face of ppp
    they taught they win later on khi seats
    but it is there mistake.
    why only before oneday of election the government relise circumtances not got for election.Recommend

  • Obsever from UK
    Jun 26, 2011 - 4:47AM

    MQM is unparalleled in getting its candidate elected by rigging.
    Since they have probably sensed they are not going to win because Mush is not around so they have started crying foul.
    MQM knows it can not win seats from constituencies in Azad Kashmir itself and was hoping to get 2 seats from Karachi and then capitalise out of that.Recommend

  • Ali
    Jun 26, 2011 - 5:17AM

    @ImnIndian:
    Its more Azad than the Kashmir you controlRecommend

  • Tony Singh
    Jun 26, 2011 - 12:04PM

    @Ali:
    “Its more Azad than the Kashmir you control”
    Yes we know you have made “Azad Kashmir” Azad of Kashmiris. Now there are only Punjabis.Recommend

  • Karim Alam
    Jun 27, 2011 - 12:59PM

    CNIC Requirement……..
    “It was withdrawn under pressure… you can understand it,” said one senior official of the AJK election commission……

    It was a matter of survival for PPP……………..and they had to do so………in order to declare that they are “Still Popular”Recommend

  • Jun 28, 2011 - 8:39PM

    @Karim Alam: Popular in Pakistan, AJK or both? It would be interesting to survey their supporters in AJK.Recommend

  • ImnIndian
    Jun 29, 2011 - 11:22PM

    @pakistanis – guess u guys dont know the meaning of azadi. its time for u guys to do some self introspection n ask whether u guys r azad in pakistan !!!Recommend

  • Karim Alam
    Jun 30, 2011 - 11:32AM

    @Tanveer Ahmed:

    I think it would be a good idea only, if the survey is conducted by an impartial and credible organization.Recommend

More in Pakistan

X