- 26 May 2010
From Palestine with love - 31 May 2010
Attack on peace flotilla - 01 Jun 2010
When will Israel learn? - 02 Jun 2010
Attack on peace flotilla - 03 Jun 2010
Why Israel doesn’t care
The writer is a freelance broadcast and print journalist ([email protected])
The heinous attack by the Israeli defence forces on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla, an act of state piracy if ever there was one, has pushed Israel further towards pariah status in the eyes of the international community. This attack comes after the very public snubbing of the US in March when Israel, on the eve of a visit by US Vice-President Joe Biden, announced the building of 1,600 new housing units in occupied Jerusalem, a direct contravene of US policy on settlement building. And let’s not forget January’s assassination of a senior Hamas leader by Mossad that caused an international outcry when it was revealed that agents had stolen or forged British, Irish, Australian, German and French passports. And that was just this year — after the bombing of Gaza.
Israel has lurched further to the extreme right in recent years. This is partly political, but partly societal. The failure of earlier peace accords, the rise of Hamas, and the success of the security barrier have made Israelis less inclined towards seeking peace with Palestinians. The Israeli bureaucracy and army are becoming unshakable in their views towards settlement. Societal changes have also had an impact. Anti-Arab racism is on the rise. In 2009, a poll by the Israeli Democracy Institute found that 53 per cent of Jewish Israelis support encouraging Arabs to leave the country. If that is not worrying, Israel also has a growing young, ultra-Orthdox population many of whom openly hold anti-Arab opinions. Extremist views were on display this March when a poll found that 56 per cent of Jewish Israeli students (up to 80 per cent in religious schools) would deny Israeli Arabs the right to be elected to the Knesset. Meanwhile, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman wants to revoke the citizenship of Israeli Arabs who won’t swear a loyalty oath to the Jewish state. Liberal Israelis and human rights organisations have been silenced. In March, the Israeli vice-prime minister, Moshe Ya’alon, called the anti-occupation Peace Now group a ‘virus’.
How much in common do we share with Israel? We too have seen a lurch to the right with rising extremism in recent years. We too have a young ultra-conservative population that is growing up skilled in nothing but espousing hatred. We too have tried to silence our human rights organisations — just ask Asma Jahangir. We too have shown state intolerance towards minorities under the guise of blasphemy laws and the second amendment of the 1973 constitution. Is anti-Arab racism by the Israeli government any worse than the Pakistani state’s sanctioned treatment of Christians or Ahmadis?
On the same day that the world witnessed Israel’s despicable actions in the Mediterranean, the Pakistani state failed to protect the most vulnerable in its society. As patients were recovering from Friday’s attack on the Ahmadi community, gunmen stormed the hospital killing 12 people and taking patients, attendants and hospital staff hostage, before fleeing. This was gross incompetence on behalf of the federal and provincial government. We are more similar to Israel than we like to acknowledge. Both countries were founded within a year of each other on the basis of religion. Both forged out of intolerable human suffering (the Holocaust and Partition respectively). Both are nuclear-armed nations with a strong, all-powerful military with entrenched hostility towards its neighbours. Both claim to be committed to democracy, free speech and minority rights — whilst often suppressing these very tenets.
Both countries also have moderates. That is the good news. Often it has been Jewish groups that have reported the worst human rights violations of Palestinians by Israeli forces. It was heartening to see over 2,000 Israelis in Tel Aviv protesting against the flotilla raid on Monday. Nor should we forget the Pakistanis who came out and spoke against the Ahmadi attacks. It’s time moderates on all sides rise up and make some noise.
Published in the Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2010.
More in Pakistan
Facebook returns
Pakistan and Israel may have many parallels, but at the same time both have several moderates who are willing to speak up for against injustice regardless of where it happens. Many colour what happened as a religious issue, or base it on nationality. But few have recognized that people such as Haneen Zuabi, a member of the Israeli Knesset who was on the Mavi Marmara and the thousands of Israeli’s who have protested against the actions of their own government recognize injustice when they see it.
Its come down to this in the end: an intolerant, hate spewing,violent group such as the Taliban has more in common with its arch enemy. Extreme right-wing ultra-nationalists that now head up the Israeli government.
Perhaps your readers would consider signing the following petition?
http://www.avaaz.org/en/gazaflotilla3/?cl=590251628&v=6404Recommend
Israel is a genuinely ideological state, we turned ideological mainly after Zia rule.Recommend
Pakistani govt. has failed in everything.Recommend
A good comparison of two nations. but there is another thing which is common in these two nations and that is:
both countries(nations) take any attack against them as attack on their religion. Recommend
Roots of the Terrorism and the World Biggest Terrorist Country is “ISRAEL” then “AMERICA” and America is the Lord of Terrorist…!!! (Voice of Habibies)Recommend
@ Habibies
May God have pity on you.Recommend
Despite the spectacular failure of the Pakistani state in safeguarding the lives of its citizens, the forced comparison of the two countries of Mr. Fulton seem forced at best and disingenuous at its worst.
Discrimination is deplorable in every form, there is no denying that. But the Arab population in Israel is reaching numbers which would soon overtake the non-arab population. That is an extreme discrimination (bordering on possible future catastrophe) against a majority. The attack on the Ahmadis while heinous was one against a minority. The attack should be condoned in any way. My beef is with Mr. Fulton’s dismissive stance towards geo-political realities allowing him to make a rather vacuous, simplistic sounding comparison. Acts of violence based on discrimination happen everywhere in the world and should be sanctioned against and clamped down upon. The point though is, WHY they happen should be also be understood (and Israel and Pakistani situations are based on very different contextual realities)
My second contention is that Israel’s stance is purely that of “us-against-the-world”, a mindset brought on by a guilty conscience of a country born upon the basis of an international injustice. Pakistan’s problems are self-made in a country which tried to dabble too much in the affairs of its neighbours (namely, Afghanistan). Growing intolerance may be a rising trend in Pakistan but it is one which is seeing the light of day as Zia’s idealogy slowly permeates its way through our country. This intolerance, despite being on the rise, in its extreme is found in a minority in Pakistan. Majority of the Israelis’ mindsets are nationalist dogmas indoctrinated through their view that the world is somehow hell-bent on destroying their state. This is a crucial difference which if, lumped together, makes for a simplistic view of the world.
And we all know where disregarding the complexities of realities takes us. Just ask the people suffering today after someone somewhere in our power structure once decided in the late 1980s that Afghanistan would make for a lovely proxy state.Recommend
Pakistan was never built upon the ideology of Religion…pls read Jinnah’s 2 nation theory and the infamous 14 points of Jinnah. we were transformed in the era of Zia:(Recommend
Excellent article George …. saw you shopping at the Sunday Bazar last weekend … guess you are more patriot than many of us born-nationalists :)
@ Sheraz Rajput: .. I wonder why the name of the country was chosen as “Islamic Republic of Pakistan” ?Recommend
Like Hasan said Islamic Republic of Pakistan, this name is not a coincidence. Republic is also known as Representative Democracy. Islamic state is not Theocracy it is a Republic. Islamic Republic sets Almighty Allah’s given Allah as the sovereign, Shariat as its law. We are not democracy not a theocracy, not feudal state. Please acclimatize with the fact both Allama Iqbal and Jinnah wanted Islamic state, action of few who sow hate among different religions doesn’t mean they did not want Islamic state.Recommend
Gurriya Mir, Habbibies is right. There is a thing called state terrorism, try reading about it.Recommend
Good article, i would just like to add that those in Pakistan that fail to speak up and take action against their government and ministers that sit their supporting the cruel laws made in 1973 and enhanced in 1984 that criminalize one for his or her believes. The Taliban was a creation of these laws and is now a beast coming come to roost with those moderate conservatives who in their heart believe in those judgments passed in 74 and 84 but stopped short of saying so now the Taliban is on your door step about to wreck havoc on you and your lives also. ISLAM says there is no compulsion in faith Allah say to just convey the message nothing more Pakistan says who is a Muslim and who is not, I can’t recall when they became god.Recommend
Good comparison. The two states came into existence about the same time and both were driven by the survival and rights of minority religious groups.
How did Israelites manage tension between sects if they have/had any? Is Judaism friendly towards democracy? Recommend