Sunny
High: 33°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
 
< >

Experts denounce HEC devolution as ‘political vendetta’

Published: April 22, 2011

Opine that handing over the commission would spell disaster for higher education.

ISLAMABAD: 

Speakers at a seminar concluded that the proposed devolution of the Higher Education Commission (HEC) to provinces is merely a political ploy developed after the verification of the educational degrees of parliamentarians.

The seminar on “HEC and Higher Education in Pakistan” was organised by the Physics department of Quaid-i-Azam University (QAU) on Thursday. Prof Tahir Amin, chairperson of the department, said that it would be wrong to say that the HEC is being handed over to the provinces under constitutional or legal obligation. Rather, he termed the move a “political vendetta” developed in the aftermath of the degrees’ verification process.

He added that most parliamentarians, as well as a former law minister, possessed degrees of dubious authenticity. He maintained that the devolution of HEC to provinces at this stage would be a disaster as far as higher education is concerned.

Prof Amin said that each province would set its own standard rather than follow a centralised and uniform standard. He argued against the desirability of such a situation by referring to the “pathetic state of education” in the provinces at primary and secondary levels, where large numbers of ghost schools are discovered from time to time.

“What will the future of education in provinces be when a provincial chief minister says that a degree is a degree whether it is fake or original?” he questioned, recalling a recent remark made by the Baloch chief minister on the fake degrees issue. The professor said that the capacity of provinces should be built up first before the responsibility is shifted to them.

Dr Khursheed, a professor at QAU, noted that the provinces were not in a position to handle such a huge responsibility. He advised the government to establish regional offices of the HEC in the provinces and then shift the responsibility to provincial governments in phases. While he was happy with the performance of the HEC so far, he thought there is still much that could be improved. He said, “Universities must focus on quality along with quantity.”

He also talked about the urgent need to address the problem of some universities starting PhD programmes without having qualified faculty.

Aasim Sajjad of Pakistan Study centre at QAU advised against believing that every problem related to higher education was resolved during the last eight years. He asked all people to handle matters on a factual and rational basis.

He noted that devolution had long been an object of the focus of various governments, including the Musharraf regime, but the media only created controversy about devolution when democratic governments were in power.

Mushtaq Gaadi, who teaches at QAU, said that the HEC had served primarily as a vehicle for the commercialisation of higher education as opposed to an institution that improved quality, accessibility, or equity in higher education.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 22nd, 2011.

Reader Comments (5)

  • Ammar Rashid
    Apr 22, 2011 - 3:03PM

    I’m sorry Tribune but this is a complete misrepresentation of the seminar, which I attended from start to finish. The report is riddled with misstatements and half-truths and the editors would do well to pull this adulterated piece from the website altogether.

    Only one speaker, Tahir Amin, initially spoke about the political angle behind the devolution (fake degrees, etc) and even he was forced to backtrack by the overwhelming reaction against that statement by the other speakers and the students present. In the end even he was forced to concede that greater provincial autonomy in the management of higher education was a necessity, both constitutionally and otherwise. All the other speakers had a consensus from the very beginning that devolution of higher education was desirable even though they disagreed on the pace and mode of decentralization.

    By focussing solely on Dr. Amin’s initial incendiary remarks (and even making some up in the process) the reporter (and, possibly, editor) has only made clear his own biases. This is a complete travesty of a report and completely unbecoming of a paper that wishes to establish its credibility in the national press. Please print this.Recommend

  • Nadia Javed
    Apr 23, 2011 - 12:28AM

    @ Ammar Rashid.. Well done, keep it up…!!Recommend

  • Karim Khan
    Apr 23, 2011 - 4:33PM

    Ignoring the rest of the lies in this post, I want to ask who actually is the chairperson of the department of physics. Is it Prof Tahir Amin as claimed in the post above, or is it Dr. S. K. Hasanain as I can see on the university’s website here. Was the paper’s factchecker on leave while this post was being processed?Recommend

  • Zeeshan
    Apr 24, 2011 - 11:41PM

    @ Ammar Rashid Weldone from me too..Recommend

  • Zeeshan
    Apr 24, 2011 - 11:43PM

    Another Biased article by a ‘Tribune’ author. I have seen many like this on Tribune, can’t believe how they allow these type of people to write an intellectual article based on their on thinking but not on Facts.Recommend

More in Pakistan

X