Fertiliser subsidy claims: FBR stays away, food ministry steps in

Ministry, however, lacks expertise in processing such claims


Peer Muhammad October 23, 2016
Not only this, the fertiliser importing companies have also asked the government to stop the marketing of subsidised DAP as the outstanding payments for the last three months as well as from last year have not been made to them. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR)’s decision to distance itself from the verification process of subsidy claims filed by diammonium phosphate (DAP) importers, has spelt trouble for the Ministry of National Food Security and Research because of its lack of expertise in the area.

The payment of subsidy claims has already been delayed for months in the wake of less coordination among government departments and absence of cooperation from some provinces.

Under the fertiliser subsidy package announced in the federal budget for 2016-17, the FBR was initially tasked to verify the claims to be submitted by the DAP importers, but the recent FBR decision to sideline itself posed a new challenge to the food ministry to undertake the task.

The FBR had earlier failed to establish a mechanism for processing the fertiliser subsidy for more than three months, a responsibility entrusted by the federal government through a notification on June 25, 2016.

The FBR will now play the role of a post office by receiving the subsidy claims and forwarding them to the food ministry for verification.

The Ministry of National Food Security and Research has given this task to one of its wings, the Agriculture Policy Institute (API), but it has no previous experience of dealing with this matter as well as the complications that arise from over and under-invoicing.

It has been learnt that API officials have started working on the verification process, but challenges remain. Questions will be raised over transparency of the claims being submitted by more than 15 fertiliser companies as the food ministry has found some unrealistic figures received from a few companies.

Centre, provinces on opposing sides

This is not for the first time that lack of coordination and cooperation between federal and provincial departments has stood in the way of a smooth implementation of policies, leading to bad governance.

In fiscal year 2014-15, the allocated Rs2-billion subsidy could not be released due to failure of the government to devise a mechanism throughout the year. In the same way, the federal and provincial governments could not come on the same page last year, which hampered the implementation of subsidy schemes, as Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) and Sindh refused to contribute their subsidy share.

This year too, the two provinces are yet to announce whether they will contribute or not. Only Punjab and Balochistan have agreed to release their share and the former has already deposited half of it in the State Bank account. In a recent meeting, the representatives of K-P and Sindh stated that they had prepared a summary for assessment by their chief ministers, but no concert decision has been taken so far.

Earlier, voicing concern over delay in the payment of fertiliser subsidy, the Punjab Agriculture Department asked the central government to take immediate steps to resolve the issue and ensure supply of necessary fertiliser in the current Rabi crop-sowing season.

The Punjab agriculture minister wrote a letter to Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, asking him to address the matter at the earliest as he feared DAP shortage for the staple wheat crop.

He also asked the centre to ensure that all provinces deposit their due share as they had not met their commitment last year and only Punjab contributed its share of Rs3 billion.

Not only this, the fertiliser importing companies have also asked the government to stop the marketing of subsidised DAP as the outstanding payments for the last three months as well as from last year have not been made to them.

The writer is a staff correspondent 

Published in The Express Tribune, October 24th, 2016.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (1)

H.A.Khan | 7 years ago | Reply FBR is averse to doing any hard work in interest of the nation.They rely on withholding txes and withholding refunds to meet the tax collection targets. FBR claims it has audit capacity and over 21,000 officers and staff.Well, they should carry out verification as is being requested
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ