CPJ list: Pakistan tops the list with 8 journalists killed

Committee to Protect Journalists lists 44 journalists either murdered or killed while covering dangerous situations.


Afp February 16, 2011

NEW YORK: At least 44 journalists were killed worldwide because of their jobs last year, with Pakistan the deadliest country to work in, a rights group said on Tuesday.

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) listed 44 journalists either murdered or killed while covering dangerous situations. Another 31 deaths took place in circumstances that may have been connected to work.

Leading the death toll was Pakistan with eight slain, followed by Iraq with five, Honduras, Mexico and Indonesia with three each, and Somalia with two.

The total number of reporters killed was much lower than in 2009, when the record figure of 72 worldwide was skewed by a one-off massacre in the Philippines.

In an introduction to the annual CPJ report, Al-Jazeera host Riz Khan said the explosion of online and digital media has made old-fashioned censorship much more difficult to achieve, but that violence continues.

“More and more, intimidation has become the tool of choice: Scare journalists into staying away from a story; make sure they understand their interference is not welcome. A few dead bodies along the way should help,” he wrote.

The most vulnerable reporters are local employees rather than famous international correspondents, he said.

“International correspondents are often visitors who don’t file on a daily basis and aren’t as deep into the stories or issues. They can simply be refused an entry visa into a country. The true champions, resisting the threats and pressures every day, are the local reporters.”

Published in The Express Tribune, February 16th, 2011.

COMMENTS (1)

IZ | 13 years ago | Reply On seeing the photograph and reading the headline my first thought was, "OMG! Riz Khan has been killed?"
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ